Size, Sustainability, and Urban Climate Planning in a Multilevel Governance Framework

  • George C. Homsy
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


In the United States, the absence of federal leadership on climate change and a strong tradition of localism has created a system in which many greenhouse gas reduction efforts fall to the discretion of municipalities. This often leads to uncoordinated action across jurisdictional boundaries. Despite the widespread notion that cities can lead on climate policy from the bottom-up, I find, using a logistic regression analysis of data from 1837 municipalities, that local governments are more likely to enact climate change policies in an environment where higher levels of government have acted rather than in a decentralized one. Smaller municipalities, in particular, have increased odds of action when their states act. Using existing regional, state-based initiatives, I present options for a coordination and capacity building framework.


Local government Climate change Urban policymaking Regionalism 


  1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: new strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93. doi: 10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreen, W. L. (2003). The Evolution of Water Pollution Control in the United States—State, Local, and Federal Efforts, 1789–1972: Part 1. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 22, 145–200.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, R. N. L. (2006). Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Balme, R., & Qi, Y. (2014, June 5). Multi-Level Governance and the Environment: Intergovernmental Relations and Innovation in Environmental Policy. Environmental Policy & Governance, pp. 147–154.Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, E., & Deakin, E. A. (2012). Smart Growth Planning for Climate Protection. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(1), 70–86. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2011.645272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J. M., & Portney, K. E. (2013). Sustainability and Interest Group Participation in City Politics. Sustainability, 5(5), 2077–2097. doi: 10.3390/su5052077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Betsill, M. (2001). Mitigating climate change in US cities: Opportunities and obstacles. Local Environment, 6(4), 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birch, E. L., & Lynch, A. (2012). Measuring U.S. Sustainable Urban Development. In L. Starke (Ed.), State of the World 2012 (pp. 77–86). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. Accessed 1 July 2012.
  10. Bloomberg, M. R., & Aggarwala, R. T. (2008). Think Locally, Act Globally: How Curbing Global Warming Emissions Can Improve Local Public Health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5), 414–423. doi: 16/j.amepre.2008.08.029.Google Scholar
  11. Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2003). Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the “Urban” Politics of Climate Change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000310178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, S. (1996). Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (2011). U.S. Cities and States. Accessed 25 May 2012.
  16. Corburn, J. (2009). Cities, Climate Change and Urban Heat Island Mitigation: Localising Global Environmental Science. Urban Studies, 46(2), 413–427. doi: 10.1177/0042098008099361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crane, R., & Landis, J. (2010). Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(4), 389–401. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2010.512036.
  18. Davenport, C. (2017, January 21). Climate Change References Are Purged From Website. The New York Times, p. A20. New York.Google Scholar
  19. Davenport, C., & Rubin, A. J. (2017, March 28). Trump Signs Executive Order Unwinding Obama Climate Policies. The New York Times. Accessed 29 March 2017.
  20. Engel, K. H. (2005). Mitigating Global Climate Change in the United States: A Regional Approach. NYU Environmental Law Journal, 14, 55–86.Google Scholar
  21. Feiock, R. C. (2013). The Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 397–425. doi: 10.1111/psj.12023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FEMA. (2008). National Response Framework. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
  23. Fiorino, D. J. (2006). The New Environmental Regulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fischman, R. L. (2005). Cooperative Federalism and Natural Resources Law. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 14, 179.Google Scholar
  25. Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2010). The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gore, C., & Robinson, P. (2009). Local Government Response to Climate Change: Our Last, Best Hope? In H. Selin & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance (pp. 137–158). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Greenwood, D. (2012). The challenge of policy coordination for sustainable sociotechnical transitions: the case of the zero-carbon homes agenda in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(1), 162–179. doi: 10.1068/c1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gustavsson, E., Elander, I., & Lundmark, M. (2009). Multilevel governance, networking cities, and the geography of climate-change mitigation: two Swedish examples. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 59–74. doi: 10.1068/c07109j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hale, S. (2010). The new politics of climate change: why we are failing and how we will succeed. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 255–275. doi: 10.1080/09644010903576900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hibbard, P. J., Tierney, S. F., Okie, A. M., & Darling, P. G. (2011). The economic impacts of the regional greenhouse gas initiative on ten Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. Boston, MA: Analysis Group.Google Scholar
  31. Holloway, C. F., Strickland, C. H., Gerrard, M. B., & Firger, D. M. (2014). Solving the CSO Conundrum: Green Infrastructure and the Unfulfilled Promise of Federal-Municipal Cooperation. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 38, 335–369.Google Scholar
  32. Homsy, G. C. (2016). Powering sustainability: Municipal utilities and local government policymaking. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(6), 1076–1094. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15596530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Homsy, G. C., Liu, Z., & Warner, M. E. (2016, December 28). Finding the Center in Multilevel Governance: Comparing U.S. and China Environmental Cleanup Efforts. Unpublished, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
  34. Homsy, G. C., & Warner, M. E. (2012). Off the Beaten Path: Sustainability Activities in Small Towns and Rural Municipalities. In Municipal Year (Ed.), Book 2012 (pp. 53–61). Washington, DC: ICMA Press.Google Scholar
  35. Homsy, G. C., & Warner, M. E. (2013). Climate Change and the Co-Production of Knowledge and Policy in Rural USA Communities. Sociologia Ruralis, 53(3), 291–310. doi: 10.1111/soru.12013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Homsy, G. C., & Warner, M. E. (2015). Cities and Sustainability Polycentric Action and Multilevel Governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 46–73. doi: 10.1177/1078087414530545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. The American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.Google Scholar
  38. Howell-Moroney, M. (2008). The Tiebout Hypothesis 50 Years Later: Lessons and Lingering Challenges for Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 97–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00840.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2001). Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Planning theory & practice, 1(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jepson, E. J. (2004). The Adoption of Sustainable Development Policies and Techniques in U.S. Cities: How Wide, How Deep, and What Role for Planners? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 229–241. doi: 10.1177/0739456X03258638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jochem, E., & Madlener, R. (2003). The forgotten benefits of climate change mitigation: Innovation, technological leapfrogging, employment, and sustainable development. In Workshop on the Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policy Makers. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  42. Karapin, R. (2016). Political Opportunities for Climate Policy: California, New York, and the Federal Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi‐level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.
  44. Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kousky, C., & Schneider, S. H. (2003). Global climate policy: will cities lead the way? Climate Policy, 3(4), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krause, R. M. (2011a). Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(1), 45–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00510.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krause, R. M. (2011b). An assessment of the greenhouse gas reducing activities being implemented in US cities. Local Environment, 16(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.562491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lubell, M., Feiock, R. C., & Handy, S. (2009). City Adoption of Environmentally Sustainable Policies in California’s Central Valley. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(3), 293–308. doi: 10.1080/01944360902952295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lutsey, N., & Sperling, D. (2008). America’s bottom-up climate change mitigation policy. Energy Policy, 36(2), 673–685. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mazmanian, D. A., & Kraft, M. E. (1999). The Three Epochs of the Environmental Movement. In D. A. Mazmanian & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy (pp. 3–41). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  51. McGinnis, M. (1999). Introduction. In Michael McGinnis (Ed.), Polycentric Governance and Development (pp. 1–28). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Metz, D., & Below, C. (2009). Local land use and climate change policy: summary report from focus groups and interviews with local officials in the Intermountain West (Working Paper No. WP09DM2). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Google Scholar
  53. Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2012). Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons, 6(2), 104–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nelson, K. L., & Svara, J. H. (2012). Form of Government Still Matters Fostering Innovation in U.S. Municipal Governments. The. American Review of Public Administration, 42(3), 257–281. doi: 10.1177/0275074011399898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ostrom, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5095). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  56. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. doi:16/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004.Google Scholar
  57. Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warren, R. (1961). The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. The American Political Science Review, 55(4), 831–842. doi: 10.2307/1952530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pastor, M., Lester, T. W., & Scoggins, J. (2009). Why Regions? Why Now? Who Cares? Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pitt, D. (2010). The impact of internal and external characteristics on the adoption of climate mitigation policies by US municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 851–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rabe, B. G. (1999). Sustainability in a Regional Context: The Case of the Great Lakes Basin. In D. A. Mazmanian & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Toward Sustainable Communities: Transition and Transformations in Environmental Policy (pp. 247–281). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rabe, H. (2009). Second-Generation Climate Policies in the States: Poliferation, Diffusion, and Regionalization. In H. Selin & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance (pp. 67–85). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rayner, S. (2010). How to Eat an Elephant: A Bottom-up Approach to Climate Policy. Climate Policy, 10(6), 615–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Renkow, M., & Hoover, D. (2000). Commuting, Migration, and Rural-Urban Population Dynamics. Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 261–287. doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Saha, D. (2009). Factors Influencing Local Government Sustainability Efforts. State and Local Government Review, 41(1), 39–48. doi: 10.1177/0160323X0904100105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Salkin, P. E. (2009). Sustainability and Land Use Planning: Greening State and Local Land Use Plans and Regulations to Address Climate Change Challenges and Preserve Resources for Future Generations. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 34, 1–50.Google Scholar
  66. Selin, H., & Van Deveer, S. D. (2009). North American Climate Governance: Policymaking and Institutions in the Multilevel Greenhouse. In H. Selin & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance (pp. 305–325). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sharp, E. B., Daley, D. M., & Lynch, M. S. (2011). Understanding Local Adoption and Implementation of Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Urban Affairs Review, 47(3), 433–457. doi: 10.1177/1078087410392348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Slavin, M. I. (2011). Where Sustainability Stands Now: Contemporary Trends and Future Prospects. In M. I. Slavin (Ed.), Sustainability in America’s Cities (pp. 231–246). Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. Accessed 22 March 2012.Google Scholar
  69. Snyder, L. P. (1994). “The Death-Dealing Smog over Donora, Pennsylvania”: Industrial Air Pollution, Public Health Policy, and the Politics of Expertise, 1948-1949. Environmental History Review, 18(1), 117–139. doi: 10.2307/3984747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sovacool, B. K. (2011). An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3832–3844. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stavins, R. N. (2010). The Problem of the Commons: Still Unsettled After 100 Years. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 16403. Accessed 13 September 2011.
  72. Svara, J. H. (2011). The Early Stage of Local Government Action to Promote Sustainability. In The Municipal Year Book 2011 (pp. 43–60). Washington, DC: ICMA Press.Google Scholar
  73. Svara, J. H., Read, A., & Moulder, E. (2011). Breaking New Ground: Promoting Environmental and Energy Programs in Local Government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.Google Scholar
  74. Tang, Z., Brody, S. D., Quinn, C., Chang, L., & Wei, T. (2010). Moving from agenda to action: evaluating local climate change action plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(1), 41–62. doi: 10.1080/09640560903399772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wheeler, S. M. (2002). The new regionalism - Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 267–278.Google Scholar
  76. Zahran, S., Grover, H., Brody, S. D., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Risk, Stress, and Capacity Explaining Metropolitan Commitment to Climate Protection. Urban Affairs Review, 43(4), 447–474. doi: 10.1177/1078087407304688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations