Multilevel Governance and Innovations in the Financing of Urban Climate Change Strategies

Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Cities have become key policy actors in the global fight against climate change. Local climate change initiatives, however, generally come with a cost and for policies to be successful, appropriate revenue sources and financing mechanisms are necessary. Decentralization theories and municipal finance literature provide guidance on how most municipal services should be financed, yet encounter challenges when it comes to the policy area of climate change. Models based on aligning the benefits of a given municipal service with those who pay for it are of limited use, as the beneficiaries of urban climate change efforts are simultaneously local and global. Cities have been able to tailor traditional financing mechanisms (such as property taxes and user fees) to incentivize citizens to reduce their carbon footprints while generating the resources necessary to fund local climate change projects. However, given the unconventional and global nature of climate change as an urban policy area, cities will likely benefit by looking beyond the formal intergovernmental institutions that structure cities’ financing abilities. This chapter advocates applying a multilevel governance lens that recognizes the importance of new, outside actors that operate at both the local and global scales to climate change financing solutions. By acknowledging the important relationship between municipal finance and the broader multilevel frameworks that govern climate change policy, cities have the opportunity to pursue innovations in municipal finance to support their climate change objectives.

Keywords

Municipal revenue Climate finance Financial tools Urban finance Federalism 

References

  1. Abels, M. (2014). Strategic alignment for the new normal: Collaboration, sustainability, and deliberation in local government across boundaries. State and Local Government Review, 46(3), 211–218. doi:10.1177/0160323X14551179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, E., & Brosio, G. (2015). Handbook of multilevel finance. Google Scholar
  3. Alm, J. (2015). Financing urban infrastructure: Knowns, unknowns, and a way forward. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(2), 230–262. doi:10.1111/joes.12045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayers, Jessica. (2009). International funding to support urban adaptation to climate change. Environment & Urbanization., 21(1), 225–240. doi:10.1177/0956247809103021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazel, P., & Mintz, J. (2014). The free ride is over: Why cities, and citizens, must start paying for much-needed infrastructure. University of Calgary, School of Public Policy SPP Research Papers, 7(14).Google Scholar
  6. Braun, G., & Hazelroth, S. (2015). Energy infrastructure finance: Local dollars for local energy. The Electricity Journal, 28(5), 6–21. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2015.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2003). Cities and climate change: Urban sustainability and global environmental governance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulkeley, H. A., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental politics., 22(1), 136–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the governing of climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. California Department of Water Resources. (2017). California turf replacement initiative. http://www.water.ca.gov/turf/. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  11. Chernick, H., Langley, A., & Reschovsky, A. (2011). Revenue diversification in large U.S. cities. University of Toronto, IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance, 5.Google Scholar
  12. DuPuis, N., & McFarland, C. K. (2016). Paying for local infrastructure in a new era of federalism: A state-by-state analysis. Washington: National League of Cities.Google Scholar
  13. Eduardo, P. (2016). Finance Systems for Sustainable Cities. Climate and Clean Air Coalition. http://www.ccacoalition.org/en/blog/finance-systems-sustainable-cities.
  14. FCM. (2017). Green municipal fund. http://www.fcm.ca/home/programs/green-municipal-fund.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  15. Gore, C. D., & Robinson, P. (2009). Local government response to climate change: Our last, best hope? In H. Selin & S. D. VanDeveer (Eds.), Changing climates in North American politics: Institutions, policymaking, and multilevel governance (pp. 137–158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hanniman, K. (2015). A good crisis: Canadian municipal credit conditions after the Lehman brothers Bankruptcy. University of Toronto, IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance, 22.Google Scholar
  17. Homsy, G., & Warner, M. (2015). Cities and sustainability: Polycentric action and multilevel governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 46–73. doi:10.1177/1078087414530545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000649.Google Scholar
  19. IISD/SDG Knowledge Hub. (2016, July 5). June 2016 climate finance update: Funds meet, non-state actor engagement accelerates. http://sdg.iisd.org/news/june-2016-climate-finance-update-funds-meet-non-state-actor-engagement-accelerates/. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  20. Kamal-Chaoui, L., & Robert A. (eds). (2009). Competitive Cities and Climate Change, Regional Development Working Papers No 2, OECD.Google Scholar
  21. Kitchen, H. M. (2006). A state of disrepair how to fix the financing of municipal infrastructure in Canada. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Kitchen, H., & Slack, E. (2016). New tax sources for Canada’s largest cities: What are the options? University of Toronto, IMFG perspectives, 15Google Scholar
  23. Kjaer, A. M. (2009). Governance and the urban bureaucracy. In J. S. Davies & D. L. Imbroscio (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 137–152). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koppenjan, J. (2015). Public-Private Partnerships for green infrastructures. Tensions and challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12, 30–34. http://dx.doi.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.010.
  25. Krause, R. M. (2012). Political decision-making and the local provision of public goods: The case of municipal climate protection in the US. Urban Studies, 49(11), 2399–2417. doi:10.1177/0042098011427183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunce, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2005). On interjurisdictional competition and environmental federalism. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(1), 212–224. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2004.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, Y., Feiock, R., & Lee, I. (2014). A multilevel governance and growth management: The use of impact fees by Florida cities. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(4), 328–338. doi:10.1177/0891242414548510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lubell, M., Feiock, R., & Handy, S. (2009). City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California’s Central Valley. Journal of The American Planning Association, 75(3), 293–308. doi:10.1080/01944360902952295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mullin, M. (2008). The conditional effect of specialized governance on public policy. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 125–141. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00303.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2010). Financial instruments and funding new expenditure needs, in cities and climate change. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Olson, M. (1969). The principal of “fiscal equivalence”: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review, 59, 479–487.Google Scholar
  33. Pagano, M., & Perry, D. (2008). Financing infrastructure in the 21st century city. Public Works Management & Policy, 13(1), 22–38. doi:10.1177/1087724X08321015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peck, S. (2000). Green infrastructure funds. Alternatives Journal, 263, 39.Google Scholar
  35. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2012). Urban governance. Oxford Handbooks Online. Retrieved 24 Feb 2017, from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195367867.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195367867-e-5.
  36. Peterson, J. (2017). Do municipal bond elections privilege certain infrastructure investments over others? The case of San Antonio, Texas. In Paper Presented at the 47th Annual Urban Affairs Association Conference, Minneapolis, April 19–22.Google Scholar
  37. Peterson, J., & Hughes, S. (in press). Governing garbage: Advancing urban sustainability in the context of private service delivery. Cities.Google Scholar
  38. Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richardson, B. J. (2014). The evolving marketscape of climate finance. Climate Law, 4, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, P. J., & Gore, C. D. (2005). Barriers to Canadian municipal response to climate change. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 14(1), 102–120.Google Scholar
  42. Saha, D. (2016, Oct 25) Green bonds take root in the U.S. municipal bond market. The Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/10/25/green-bonds-take-root-in-the-u-s-municipal-bond-market/.
  43. Shah, A., & Shah, S. (2006). The new vision of local governance and the evolving roles of local governments. In A. Shah (Ed.), Local governance in developing countries (pp. 1–46). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  44. Slack, E. (2011). Financing large cities and metropolitan areas. University of Toronto, IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance, 3.Google Scholar
  45. Slack, E. (2014). Own-source revenues for metropolitan cities. In Presentation to Seminario Internacional sobre alternativas de financiamiento de ciudades, Bogota, Columbia, 18 November 2014.Google Scholar
  46. Stadelmann, Martin, et al. (2013). Difficulties in accounting for private finance in international climate policy. Climate Policy, 13(6), 718–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stoker, G. (1999). The new management of British local governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. TAP. (2017). Transformative Actions Program. http://tap-potential.org/about-tap/. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  49. TD Economics. (2004, May 20). Mind the gap: Finding the way to upgrade Canada s aging public infrastructure.Google Scholar
  50. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. (2017). Local Sales and Use Tax. http://www.trcc.state.tx.us/taxinfo/local/city.html Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  51. Tindal, C. R., & Tindal, S. N. (2009). Local government in Canada. Toronto: Nelson Education.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, R. A., & McNutt, K. (2013) Climate change adaption and policy capacity in the Canadian finance sector: A meso analysis. Review of Policy Research, 30(1).Google Scholar
  53. Ziehmer, R. (2010). Missourians are Committed to Conservation. Missouri Department of Conservation https://mdc.mo.gov/conmag/2010/06/note-our-readers. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations