Cities are increasingly shaping the trajectory and impacts of climate change. While local actors play a central role in designing the institutions, infrastructures, and behaviors that drive decarbonization and adaptation to changing climatic conditions, their options and incentives are inextricably enmeshed within broader political and economic processes. Resolving these tensions and contradictions is likely to require innovative approaches to governing climate change in the city: new interactions, new political actors, new ways of coordinating and mobilizing resources, and new frameworks and technical capacities for decision-making. This book presents pioneering work on the range of innovative practices, experiments, and ideas that are becoming an integral part of urban climate change governance in the twenty-first century. Theoretically, the book builds on a nearly two-decade history of scholarship identifying the emergence of new urban actors, spaces, and political dynamics in response to climate change. Empirically, the chapters investigate new governance arrangements from around the world and leverage the insights they provide for both theory and practice. The book is organized around four guiding questions: 1) how do multilevel governance arrangements relate to innovation for urban climate change governance? 2) where is the greatest need for innovation? 3) where is innovation difficult or stifled? 4) how can innovation be fostered and encouraged in a multilevel governance context?
KeywordCities and climate change Mitigation Adaptation Urban governance
- Anguelovski, I., Shi, L., Chu, E., Gallagher, D., Goh, K., Lamb, Z., et al. (2016). Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: Critical perspectives from the global north and south. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(3), 333–348. doi: 10.1177/0739456X16645166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ansar, A., Caldecott, B., & Tilbury, J. (2013). Stranded assets and the fossil fuel divestment campaign: What does divestment mean for the valuation of fossil fuel assets. Oxford, UK: Stranded Assets Programme, SSEE, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, S., & Satterthwaite, D. (Eds.). (2016). Cities on a finite planet: Towards transformative responses to climate change. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bollinger, L. A., Bogmans, C. W. J., Chappin, E. J. L., Dijkema, G. P. J., Huibregtse, J. N., Maas, N., et al. (2014). Climate adaptation of interconnected infrastructures: A framework for supporting governance. Regional Environmental Change, 14(3), 919–931. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0428-4.Google Scholar
- Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., & Edwards, G. A. S. (2015). An urban politics of climate change: Experimentation and the governing of Socio-technical transitions. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Carmin, J., Dodman, D., & Chu, E. (2013). Urban Climate Adaptation and Leadership: From Conceptual Understanding to Practical Action (No. 2013/26). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). doi: 10.1787/5k3ttg88w8hh-en.
- Chu, E., & Schenk, T. (2017). Communicating about climate change with urban populations and decision-makers. In M. C. Nisbet (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press: Oxford and New York. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.413.
- Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (Eds.). (2009). Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
- Evans, G. (2009). Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies, 46(5–6), 1003–1040. doi: 10.1177/0042098009103853.
- Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gupta, J., Chu, E., Bos, K., & Kuijten, T. (2017). The Geo-ecological risks of oil investments by China and the global south: The right to development revisited. In M. P. Amineh & G. Yang (Eds.), Geopolitical economy of energy and environment: China and the European Union (pp. 271–304). Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishing.Google Scholar
- IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, et al., (Eds.), Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.923614.
- Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK and Malden MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Low, B., Ostrom, E., Simon, C., & Wilson, J. (2003). Redundancy and diversity: Do they influence optimal management? In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change (pp. 83–114). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- MacCullum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J., & Haddock, S. V. (Eds.). (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Measham, T. G., Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., Brooke, C., Gorddard, R., Withycombe, G., et al. (2011). Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16(8), 889–909. doi: 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Paris Agreement. (2015). The Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). United Nations.Google Scholar
- Pressman, J. L. (1975). Federal programs and city politics: The dynamics of the aid process in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Walker, R., & Storper, M. (1989). The Capitalist Imperative: Territory. Wiley-Blackwell: Technology and Industrial Growth.Google Scholar
- Wright, D. S. (1988). Understanding intergovernmental relations (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, R., & Faris, C. (2010). Chapter 4: Infrastructure impacts and adaptation challenges. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1196, 63–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05318.x.