EU Gas Supply Security: The Power of the Importer

  • Jakub M. Godzimirski
  • Zuzanna Nowak
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Climate and the Environment book series (ECE)

Abstract

The chapter examines how the European Union can exert its market and regulatory power in its relations with key external energy suppliers. The focus is on the EU instrument toolbox and how various policy instruments have been used in relations with the main suppliers of gas to the Union. Due to the centrality of Russia and Norway to the EU’s gas supply and their different ways of relating to the Union in formal and regulatory terms, the chapter focuses on the impact EU market and regulatory power has had on the operations of these two actors. The chapter also presents some general conclusions on the effectiveness of the EU’s use of various policy instruments in relations with external suppliers of energy.

References

  1. Andersen, S.S., A. Goldthau, and N. Sitter. 2015. The EU Regulatory State, Commission Leadership and External Energy Governance. In EU Leadership in Energy and Environmental Governance? Global and Local Challenges and Responses, ed. J.M. Godzimirski, 51–68. Houndmills Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, C. 2005. Norway Outside the European Union: Norway and European Integration from 1994 to 2004. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Austvik, O.G. 2003. Norwegian Natural Gas. Liberalization of the European Gas Market. Oslo: Europa-programmet.Google Scholar
  4. Austvik, O.G., and D.H. Claes. 2011. Eøs-Avtalen og Norsk Energipolitikk (EEA Agreement and Norwegian Energy Policy). http://europautredningen.no/Rap8-energi.pdf.
  5. Birchfield, V.L. 2011. The Role of EU Institutions in Energy Policy Formation. In Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy. Problems, Progress, and Prospects, ed. V.L. Birchfield and J.S. Duffield, 235–262. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Birchfield, V.L., and J.S. Duffield, eds. 2011. Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy. Problems, Progress, and Prospects. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Busygina, I., and M. Filippov. 2013. ‘Resource Curse’ and Foreign Policy: Explaining Russia’s Approach Towards the EU. In Russian Energy in a Changing World: What Is the Outlook for the Hydrocarbons Superpower, ed. J.M. Godzimirski, 91–109. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Central Bank of the Russian Federation. 2017. External Sector Statistics. http://www.cbr.ru/eng/statistics/?Prtid=svs. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  9. Černiuk, I. 2016. GIPL Project: Interconnector to the European Market. Baltic Rim Economies 6: 45–46.Google Scholar
  10. Claes, D.H., and P.O. Eikeland. 1999. Stormakt i Utakt—Norsk Energi og EUs Indre Marked. In Utenfor, Annerledes Og Suveren? Norge Under Eøs-Avtalen, ed. D.H. Claes and B.S. Tranøy, 151–173. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget og Arena.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyer, I., and G. Stang. 2013. What Energy Security for the EU? EUISS Brief Issue (39 at http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Brief_39_Energy_security.pdf).
  12. ———. 2014. Energy Moves and Power Shifts: EU Foreign Policy and Global Energy Security. http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Report_18.pdf.
  13. Eberlein, B. 2008. The Making of the European Energy Market: The Interplay of Governance and Government. Journal of Public Policy 28 (1): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Energy Sector. In Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, ed. C.F. Sabel and J. Zeitlin, 61–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eberlein, B., and D. Kerwer. 2004. New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egenhofer, C., F. Genoese, and A. Dimitrova. 2014. Making the Most of Energy Union. CEPS Commentary. Brussels: CEPS. http://www.ceps.eu/system/files/Energy%20Union.pdf.Google Scholar
  17. Egmond, C., R. Jonkers, and G. Kok. 2006. One Size Fits All? Policy Instruments Should Fit the Segments of Target Groups. Energy Policy 34 (18): 3464–3474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eikeland, P.O. 2011. The Third Internal Energy Market Package: New Power Relations among Member States, EU Institutions and Non-State Actors? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (2): 243–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02140.x.Google Scholar
  19. Endresen, R., and M. Ånestad. 2013. Gass Skvises fra Alle Kanter. Dagens Næringsliv, June 5, 18–19.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2006. Green Paper: A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0105&from=EN.
  21. ———. 2011. Energy Roadmap 2050. Brussels: European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0885&from=EN.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2014a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Short Term Resilience of the European Gas System. Vol. COM (2014) 654 final. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2014_stresstests_com_en_0.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  23. ———. 2014b. European Energy Security Strategy. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/doc/20140528_energy_security_communication.pdf.
  24. ———. 2014c. In-Depth Study of European Energy Security. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/doc/20140528_energy_security_study.pdf.
  25. ———. 2015a. Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/infrastructure/baltic-energy-market-interconnection-plan. Accessed 22 May 2017.
  26. ———. 2015b. Energy Union. http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/energy-union/index_en.htm. Accessed 26 March 2015.
  27. ———. 2015c. Energy Union: Advancing the Integration of European Energy Markets. IP/15/5142. Brussels: European Commission. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5142_en.htm.
  28. ———. 2016. Eu Reference Scenario 2016. Energy, Transport and Ghg Emissions. Trends to 2050. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ref2016_report_final-web.pdf.
  29. ———. 2017a. 2nd Report on the State of the Energy Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/2nd-report-state-energy-union_en.pdf.
  30. ———. 2017b. Monitoring Progress Towards the Energy Union Objectives—Key Indicators. Second Report on the State of the Energy Union. Commission Staff Working Document. https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/file/2477/download_en?token=zdmr7Dlx.
  31. Glachant, J.-M. 2015. Energy Manifesto. A New Energy Policy for the New European Commission? Firenze EUI Florence School of Regulation. http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/34777/EnergyManifesto2015.pdf?sequence=1.
  32. Glachant, J.-M., M. Hallack, and M. Vazquez, eds. 2013. Building Competitive Gas Markets in the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  33. Godzimirski, J.M. 2009. Energy Security and the Politics of Identity. In Political Economy of Energy in Europe: Forces of Integration and Fragmentation, 173–208. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2011. Nord Stream: Globalization in the Pipeline. In Russia’s Encounter with Globalization: Actors, Processes and Critical Moments, ed. Elana Wilson Rowe and Julie Wilhelmsen, 159–184. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2013. Russia’s External Energy Strategy: Opportunities and Challenges until 2030. In Russian Energy and Security up to 2030, ed. S. Oxenstierna and V.-P. Tynkkynen, 213–231. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2014a. European Energy Security in the Wake of the RussianUkrainian Crisis, PISM Strategic File Vol. 27(63). Warsaw PISM. http://www.pism.pl/files/?id_plik=18874.
  37. ———. 2014b. How Does the Search for Energy Security Affect EU Policies in Other Issue-Areas? GR:EEN Policy Brief. University of Warwick. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/green/papers/policybriefs/green_policy_brief_godzimirski_energy_otherareas_final.pdf.
  38. ———. 2014c. The Norwegian Energy Security Debate. In Common Challenges, National Responses: The Political Economy of Renewable Energy and Energy Security in Japan, China and Northern Europe, ed. E. Moe and P. Midford, 116–136. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2015. Russia–EU Energy Relations: From Complementarity to Distrust? In EU Leadership in Energy and Environmental Governance? Global and Local Challenges and Responses, ed. J.M. Godzimirski, 89–112. Houndmills Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Godzimirski, J.M., and E. Demakova. 2012. Russian External Energy Strategy: Opportunities and Constraints. In Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia, 149–168. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Godzimirski, J.M., R. Vilpišauskas, and R. Švedas. 2015. Energy Security in the Baltic Sea Region: Regional Coordination and Management of Interdependencies. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Goldthau, A. 2008. Rhetoric Versus Reality: Russian Threats to European Energy Supply. Energy Policy 36 (2): 686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldthau, A., and N. Sitter. 2015. A Liberal Actor in a Realist World: The European Union Regulatory State and the Global Political Economy of Energy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grigoriev, L., A. Golyashev, and Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2016. Razvitiye Konkurrentsii Na Gazovykh Rynkakh. Energeticheskii byulettin. Moscow: Analiticheskii tsentr pri pravitelstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. http://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/9458.pdf.
  45. Gullberg, A.T. 2013. The Political Feasibility of Norway as the ‘Green Battery’ of Europe. Energy Policy 57: 615–623. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kardaś, S. 2014. The Tug of War. Russia’s Response to Changes on the European Gas Market. OSW Studies. Warsaw: OSW. http://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/tug-o-_war_net.pdf.
  47. ———. 2017. Na Rozdrożu. Aktualne Problemy Rosyjskiego Sektora Gazowego. Prace OSW. Warsaw: OSW. https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/prace_63_pl_na_rozdrozu_net_0.pdf.
  48. Kaspersen, L. 2014. EU Vil Importere Mer Gass fra Norge. Dagens Næringsliv, December 27. http://www.dn.no/nyheter/energi/2014/12/26/2153/Gass/eu-vil-importere-mer-gass-fra-norge.
  49. Kuzemko, C., and A. Hadfield. 2015. Defining and Projecting EU Energy Policy. In EU Leadership in Energy and Environmental Governance? Global and Local Challenges and Responses, ed. J.M. Godzimirski, 21–50. Houndmills Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Lang, K.-O., and K. Westphal. 2017. Nord Stream 2—A Political and Economic Contextualisation. SWP Research Paper. Berlin: SWP. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2017RP03_lng_wep.pdf.
  51. Lissek, U. 2016. Nord Stream 2: Energy Security and Cooperation for Decades to Come. Baltic Rim Economies 6: 49.Google Scholar
  52. Løvas, J. 2015. Norges Gassbønn (Norway’s Gas Plea). Dagens Næringsliv, October 22. http://www.dn.no/nyheter/energi/2015/10/21/2153/Gass/norges-gassbnn.
  53. Magnus, E., B. Tennbakk, M.H. Rennesund, and A.L. Eriksrud. 2016. Gassens Rolle I Europa. http://www.thema.no/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/THEMA-rapport-2016-11-Gassens-rolle-i-Europa.pdf.
  54. Mathieu, C.. 2014. From 2020 to 2030, from Copenhagen to Paris: A Mindset change for the European Climate Policy? Actuelles de l’Ifri. Paris: IFRI. http://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/actuelle_climat_ue_en2.pdf.
  55. Matlary, J.H. 1997. Energy Policy in the European Union. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGowan, F. 2014. Regulating Innovation: European Responses to Shale Gas Development. Environmental Politics 23 (1): 41–58. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.740939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mitrova, T. (2013). Russian LNG: The Long Road to Export. http://www.ifri.org/downloads/defifrimitrovalngengdecember2013.pdf.
  58. Molnar, G., A. Behrens, C. Egenhofer, and F. Genoese. 2015. Europe’s Long Strategy in the Wider EU Gas Market. Vol. 333, CEPS Policy Brief. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/PB333_Europe%20LNG%20Strategy_0.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2016.
  59. Nørgaard, R.W., P. Nedergaard, and J. Blom-Hansen. 2014. Lobbying in the EU Comitology System. Journal of European Integration 36 (5): 491–507. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2014.889128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. OED. 2016. Export of Oil and Gas. Norsk Petroleum. http://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/production-and-exports/exports-of-oil-and-gas/. Accessed 15 August 2016.
  61. Orttung, R.W., and I. Overland. 2011. A Limited Toolbox: Explaining the Constraints on Russia’s Foreign Energy Policy. Journal of Eurasian Studies 2 (1): 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parmigiani, L. 2013. The European Gas Market: A Reality Check, 49. Paris: IFRI. http://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ifrinoteeuropeangasmarketvf176.pdf.
  63. Peruzzi, M., E. Dale, and G. Zachmann. 2014. Can Europe Survive without Russian Gas? http://www.bruegel.org/nc/blog/detail/article/1283-can-europe-survive-without-russian-gas/. Accessed 30 March 2014.
  64. Pirani, S., J. Henderson, A. Honore, H. Rogers, and K. Yafimava. 2014. What the Ukraine Crisis Means for Gas Markets. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/What-the-Ukraine-crisis-means-for-gas-markets-GPC-3.pdf.
  65. Prontera, A. 2009. Energy Policy: Concepts, Actors, Instruments and Recent Developments. World Political Science Review 5 (1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  66. Puka, L., O.G. Austvik, and A. Gawlikowska-Fyk. 2015. Norwegian Energy Policy in the Changing Eu Environment: What Poland Can Learn for Developing Its Shale Gas Industry. PISM Strategic File. Warsaw: PISM. https://www.pism.pl/files/?id_plik=19359.
  67. Rashchupkina, Y. 2015. The European Union’s Role in Networks on Removal of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Disclosure of Climate Change Information. Contemporary Politics 21 (3): 354–366. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2015.1061244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Romanova, T. 2016. Is Russian Energy Policy Towards the EU Only About Geopolitics? The Case of the Third Liberalisation Package. Geopolitics 21 (4): 857–879. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1155049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sabel, C.F., and J. Zeitlin, eds. 2010. Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sathiendrakumar, R. 2003. Greenhouse Emission Reduction and Sustainable Development. International Journal of Social Economics 30 (2): 1233–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schjøtt-Pedersen, K.E. 2016. Gass Er Europas Batteri. Dagens Næringsliv, p. 23, February 27. http://www.dn.no/meninger/debatt/2016/02/26/2145/Energi/gass-er-europas-batteri.
  72. Smith, M.E. 2011. A Liberal Grand Strategy in a Realist World? Power, Purpose and the EU’s Changing Global Role. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 144–163. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.544487.
  73. Statoil. 2016. Energy Perspectives. Long-Term Macro and Market Outlook. Retrieved from https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/energy-perspectives/energy-perspectives-2016.pdf.
  74. Stern, J.P., and H. Rogers. 2014. The Dynamics of a Liberalised European Gas Market—Key Determinants of Hub Prices, and Roles and Risks of Major Players. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/NG-94.pdf.
  75. Stern, J.P., K. Yafimava, H. Rogers, S. Pirani, L. El-Katiri, A. Honoré, J. Henderson, E. Hassanzadeh, and R. Dickel. 2014. Reducing European Dependence on Russian Gas—Distinguishing Natural Gas Security from Geopolitics. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/NG-92.pdf.
  76. Sverdrup, U. 2014. Energi og Storpolitikk. Dagens Næringsliv, August 27. http://www.dn.no/meninger/debatt/2014/08/26/2159/Globalt/energi-og-storpolitikk.
  77. ———. 2016. Oljefondet Og Utenrikspolitikken: Gorillaen I Rommet. Internasjonal Politikk 74 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Szalai, P. 2013. The Shale Gas Revolution: Can It Cross the Atlantic? http://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0293-shale-gas-revolution-can-it-cross-the-atlantic.
  79. Szulecki, K., S. Fischer, A.T. Gullberg, and O. Sartor. 2016. Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: Between National Positions and Governance Innovation in Eu Energy and Climate Policy. Climate Policy 16 (5): 548–567. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tusk, D. 2014. A United Europe Can End Russia’s Energy Stranglehold. Financial Times, April 21. https://www.ft.com/content/91508464-c661-11e3-ba0e-00144feabdc0.
  81. UD. 2012. Utenfor og Innenfor: Norges Avtaler Med EU (Outside and Inside: Norway’s Agreements with the EU), NOU: Vol. NOU 2012:2. Oslo: Departementenes servicesenter, Informasjonsforvaltning. http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/36797426/PDFS/NOU201220120002000DDDPDFS.pdf.
  82. Wærness, E. 2014. EU Trenger Masse Gass, Lenge. Dagens Næringsliv, November 13. http://www.dn.no/meninger/debatt/2014/11/12/2158/Klima/eu-trenger-masse-gass-lenge. Accessed 25 March 2015.
  83. Westphal, K. 2014. Institutional Change in European Natural Gas Markets and Implications for Energy Security: Lessons from the German Case. Energy Policy 74: 35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. World Trade Organization WTO. 2010. World Trade Report 2010. Trade in Natural Resources. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/wtr10_e.htm.
  85. Yafimava, K. 2013. The EU Third Package for Gas and the Gas Target Model: Major Contentious Issues Inside and Outside the EU. http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/NG-75.pdf.
  86. Youngs, R. 2013. The EU’s Global Climate and Energy Policies: Gathering or Losing Momentum? In The Handbook of Global Energy Policy, ed. A. Goldthau, 421–434. London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ytreberg, R. 2014. Tjener Mer På Gass Enn Olje. Dagens Næringsliv, December 31. http://www.dn.no/nyheter/finans/2014/12/30/2024/tjener-mer-p-gass-enn-olje.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jakub M. Godzimirski
    • 1
  • Zuzanna Nowak
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of International AffairsOsloNorway
  2. 2.National Centre for Nuclear ResearchPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations