Energy Securitisation: Avenues for Future Research

  • Andrew Judge
  • Tomas Maltby
  • Kacper Szulecki
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Climate and the Environment book series (ECE)

Abstract

In this chapter we identify some key areas for future research on “energy securitization” through both an examination of what Securitization Studies could learn from the study of energy issues and what insights could be drawn from theoretical developments within Securitization Studies for the study of energy security. After a brief overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the Copenhagen School framework, we outline several possibilities within two main strands of research—the discursive construction of energy security and the process of energy securitization, respectively. In the case of the former, we suggest that research should focus on the question of whether or not energy is a distinct “sector” of security, and whether it is constituted by “logics” of security that depart from the Copenhagen School’s conception of securitization. In the case of the latter, we suggest that greater attention should be paid to the audiences of attempts to securitize energy issues, and the ways in which such attempts are shaped by power relations, systems of energy governance, and the “materiality” of energy systems. We conclude with some reflections on the causal status of securitization theory and the implications this has for how to conduct further research on energy securitization.

References

  1. Balzacq, Thierry. 2010a. A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, and Variants. In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq, 1–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2010b. Enquiries into Methods: A New Framework for Securitization Analysis. In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq, 31–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2015. The ‘Essence’ of Securitization: Theory, Ideal Type, and A Sociological Science of Security. International Relations 29 (1): 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belyi, Andrei V., and Kim Talus, eds. 2015. States and Markets in Hydrocarbon Sectors. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Bigo, Didier. 2002. Security and Immigration: Towards a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives 27: 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourbeau, Phillipe. 2013. Resiliencism: Premises and Promises in Securitization Research. Resilience: International Politics, Practices and Discourses 1 (1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridge, Gavin. 2015. Energy (in)Security: World-Making in an Age of Scarcity. The Geographical Journal 181 (4): 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A new Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  9. Casier, Tom. 2011. The Rise of Energy to the Top of the EU-Russia Agenda: From Interdependence to Dependence? Geopolitics 16 (3): 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherp, Aleh, and Jessica Jewell. 2013. Energy Security Assessment Framework and Three Case Studies. In International Handbook of Energy Security, ed. Hugh Dyer and Maria J. Trombetta, 146–173. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers. Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2014. The Concept of Energy Security: Beyond the Four As. Energy Policy 75: 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christou, Odysseas, and Constantinos Adamides. 2013. Energy Securitization and Desecuritization in the New Middle East. Security Dialogue 44 (5–6): 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ciută, Felix. 2010. Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security? Security Dialogue 41 (2): 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corry, Olaf. 2012. Securitisation and ‘Riskification’: Second-order Security and the Politics of Climate Change. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Côté, Adam. 2016. Agents Without Agency: Assessing the Role of the Audience in Securitization Theory. Security Dialogue 47 (6): 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dannreuther, Roland. 2015. Energy Security and Shifting Modes of Governance. International Politics 52 (4): 466–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Goode, Marieke. 2008. The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elster, Jon. 2007. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischhendler, Itay, and Daniel Nathan. 2014. In the Name of Energy Security: The Struggle Over the Exportation of Israeli Natural Gas. Energy Policy 70: 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischhendler, Itay, Dror Boymel, and Maxwell T. Boykoff. 2015. How Competing Securitized Discourses Over Land Appropriation Are Constructed: The Promotion of Solar Energy in the Israeli Desert. Environmental Communication 10 (2): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Floyd, Rita. 2010. Security and the Environment: Securitisation Theory and US Environmental Security Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godzimirski, Jakub M. 2009. Energy Security and the Politics of Identity. In Political Economy of Energy in Europe: Forces of Integration and Fragmentation, ed. Gunnar Fermann, 173–205. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Guzzini, Stefano. 2011. Securitization as a Causal Mechanism. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guzzini, S., ed. 2013. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe?: Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hancock, Kathleen J., and Vlado Vivoda. 2014. International Political Economy: A Field Born of the OPEC Crisis Returns to Its Energy Roots. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen, Lene, and Helen Nissenbaum. 2009. Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School. International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 1155–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huysmans, Jef. 2002. Defining Social Constructivism in Security Studies: The Normative Dilemma of Writing Security. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27 (1 suppl): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, Patrick T. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2017. Interpretive Explanation in International Studies. Paper Presented at the ISV Research Seminar, Oslo, 5 May 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Judge, Andrew, and Tomas Maltby. 2017. European Energy Union? Caught Between Securitisation and ‘Riskification’. European Journal of International Security 2 (2): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Judge, Andrew, Tomas Maltby, and Jack D. Sharples. 2016. Challenging Reductionism in Analyses of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics 21 (4): 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karyotis, Georgios, and Dimitris Skleparis. 2013. The Winners and Losers of Securitising Migration. Griffith Law Review 22 (3): 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirchner, Emil, and Can Berk. 2010. European Energy Security Co-operation: Between Amity and Enmity. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 859–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuzemko, Caroline, Michael F. Keating, and Andreas Goldthau. 2016. The Global Energy Challenge: Environment, Development and Security. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lundborg, Tom, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2011. Resilience, Critical Infrastructure, and Molecular Security: The Excess of “Life” in Biopolitics. International Political Sociology 5 (4): 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maltby, Tomas. 2015. Between Amity, Enmity and Europeanisation: EU Energy Security Policy and the Example of Bulgaria’s Russian Energy Dependence. Europe-Asia Studies 67 (5): 809–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonald, Matt. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Natorski, Michal, and Anna Herranz Surrallés. 2008. Securitizing Moves To Nowhere? The Framing of the European Union’s Energy Policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research 4 (2): 71–89.Google Scholar
  40. Petersen, Karen L. 2012. Risk Analysis—A Field Within Security Studies? European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 693–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prontera, Andrea. 2017. Forms of State and European Energy Security: Diplomacy and Pipelines in Southeastern Europe. European Security 26 (2): 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasmussen, Mikkel V. 2004. ‘It Sounds Like a Riddle’: Security Studies, the War on Terror and Risk. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (2): 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salter, Mark. 2008. Securitization and Desecuritization: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. Journal of International Relations and Development 11 (4): 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schelling, Thomas C. 1998. Social Mechanisms and Social Dynamics. In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, ed. Peter Hedström and R. Swedberg, 32–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stirling, Andy. 2014. Transforming Power: Social Science and the Politics of Energy Choices. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Szulecki, Kacper. 2016. When Energy Becomes Security: Copenhagen School Meets Energy Studies. Paper Presented at the DIIS Research Seminar, Copenhagen, 16 June 2016.Google Scholar
  47. van Munster, Rens. 2005. Logics of Security: The Copenhagen School, Risk Management and the War on Terror. In Political Science Publications 10/2005. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  48. Vuori, Juha. 2008. Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic Political Orders. European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wæver, Ole. 2003. Securitisation: Taking Stock of a Research Programme in Security Studies (Unpublished Manuscript), February 2003.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, Michael J. 2008. (In)Security Studies Reflexive Modernization and the Risk Society. Cooperation and Conflict 43 (1): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, Michael C. 2011. The Continuing Evolution of Securitization Theory. In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, ed. Thierry Balzacq, 212–222. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Judge
    • 1
  • Tomas Maltby
    • 2
  • Kacper Szulecki
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of Political EconomyKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations