Energy Security and Energy Transition: Securitisation in the Electricity Sector

  • Kacper Szulecki
  • Julia Kusznir
Part of the Energy, Climate and the Environment book series (ECE)


The chapter looks at the electricity sector, which is very rarely the object of interest in Security Studies and political science, despite its clear importance as a vital energy sector sustaining vital functions and values of (post)modern societies. We trace security debates in two sub-sectors—renewables and nuclear energy and in two neighbouring countries, Germany and Poland. Germany is often lauded as the frontrunner of an energy transition while Poland—perceived as a carbon-locked in veto payer in European decarbonisation. We show that energy security discourses play a role in informing policy choices, and certainly lead to that kind of divergent rhetoric, but in reality the two countries share a commitment to coal at least in the medium term. In Poland, renewables are often framed as a threat for the electricity system. The German debate, less securitised, seems to be closer to the “objective” systemic vulnerabilities, whereas in Poland the major vulnerability of the power sector—weak and inadequate g rid—remains a non-issue. An instrumental use of securitisation and security jargon is visible among pro-renewable environmental activist in both countries, who mimic the securitising moves known from the gas sector to portray renewables as a solution to national security problems. In the nuclear sector we also find a strong example of a successful and full securitising move, with the announcement of the nuclear project as a national security issue, followed by proposed and implemented extra-ordinary measures. We find that politicians are more prone to use and accept security jargon, while technical experts in energy are most active in de- securitisation, even of such serious and problematic issues as uncontrolled electricity flows. The more international the energy issue, the more likely it is to see spill-overs from foreign policy and securitising moves drawing on a broader “security imagi nary.”


  1. AEE. 2017. Die Agentur für Erneuerbare Energien. Wertschöpfung. Available at: Accessed 24 June 2017.
  2. Ancygier, Andrzej, and Kacper Szulecki. 2014. A Common Renewable Energy Policy in Europe? Explaining the German-Polish Policy Non-convergence. ESPRI Working Papers 4, Environmental Studies and Policy Research Institute, Wroclaw.Google Scholar
  3. BDI. 2016. EU-Winterpaket: Energiewende muss europaweit organisiert warden. Available at: Accessed 23 June 2017.
  4. BiznesAlert. 2017. Tauron jednak bez odpowiedzialności za bezpieczeństwo energetyczne kraju. BiznesAlert, May 30.Google Scholar
  5. Bråten, Dennis P. 2017. Taser or Shock Collar? Energy as a Weapon and Interdependence in the Ukraine Crisis 2014–2015. MA Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  6. Cherp, Aleh, and Jessica Jewell. 2014. The Concept of Energy Security: Beyond the Four As. Energy Policy 75: 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherp, Aleh, Vadim Vinichenko, Jessica Jewell, Masahiro Suzuki, and Miklós Antal. 2017. Comparing Electricity Transitions: A Historical Analysis of Nuclear, Wind and Solar Power in Germany and Japan. Energy Policy 101: 612–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czarkowski, Marek. 2012. Klucz do dobrobytu. Przegląd 21.Google Scholar
  9. Dohmen, Frank. 2016. Kernkraft—Proviant für vier Wochen. Der Spiegel, February 13.Google Scholar
  10. Drieschner, Frank. 2013. Roter Strom, grüner Strom. Die Zeit, October 10.Google Scholar
  11. Forbes. 2013. Państwo musi ingerować w energetykę. Forbes, September 5. Available at:,artykuly,161320,1,1.html. Accessed 26 June 2017.
  12. Frank, Michael. 2006. Gegen den Strom; Österreich hegt kühne Pläne für angeblich saubere Wasserkraftwerke hoch droben in den Alpen—Umweltschützer setzen sich zur Wehr. Süddeutsche Zeitung.Google Scholar
  13. Fraunhofer. 2016. Germany’s Electricity Export Surplus Brings Record Revenue of Over Two Billion Euros, February 23.Google Scholar
  14. Gawlikowska-Fyk, Aleksandra, Kai-Olaf Lang, Karsten Neuhoff, Ellen Scholl, and Kirsten Westphal. 2017. Energy in the German-Polish Relationship: Acknowledging Controversies—Pursuing Shared Interests. SWP Comments 4.Google Scholar
  15. Guzzini, Stefano, ed. 2013. The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. IEA. 2013. Energy Policies of IEA Countries. 2013 Review. Germany. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2016. Energy Policies of IEA Countries. Poland. 2016 Review. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2017a. Poland—Energy System Overview. Available at: Accessed 25 June 2017.
  19. ———. 2017b. Germany—Energy System Overview. Available at: Accessed 25 June 2017.
  20. Kemfert, Claudia. 2013. Battle About Electricity: Myths, Power and Monopolies. Hamburg: Murmann.Google Scholar
  21. Kwiatkowska-Drożdż, Anna. 2011. Zagraniczna polityka surowcowa. Rzeczpospolita, April 1.Google Scholar
  22. Łakoma, Agnieszka. 2011. Elektrownia jądrowa w 2020 r. to ambitny plan. Rzeczpospolita, Mai 30.Google Scholar
  23. Majszyk, Konrad. 2014. Ekoofensywa przeciw kopalniom i atomowi. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna, Juni 16.Google Scholar
  24. Månsson, Andre. 2016. Energy and Security: Exploring Renewable and Efficient Energy Systems. PhD Dissertation defended at Lund University. Available at: Accessed 26 June 2017.
  25. Mayer, Bartłomiej. 2014. Jaka energia jest naprawdę zrównoważona. Dziennik Gazeta Prawna, April 29.Google Scholar
  26. Morris, Craig, and Arne Jungjohann. 2016. Energy Democracy: Germany’s Energiewende to Renewables. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naimski, Piotr. 2015. Energia i niepodległość. Kraków: Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej.Google Scholar
  28. Nie, Pu-yan, and Yong-cong Yang. 2016. Renewable Energy Strategies and Energy Security. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 8 (6): 65903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ostolski, Adam, and Olga Mielnikiewicz. 2014. PiS jeszcze gorszy od PO. Rzeczpospolita, February 25.Google Scholar
  30. Piskorski, Paweł. 2014. Antyłupkowy sojusz rosyjsko-ekologiczny. NaTemat, June 20.Google Scholar
  31. Puka, Lidia, and Kacper Szulecki. 2014a. Beyond the “Grid-Lock” in Electricity Interconnectors: The Case of Germany and Poland. Discussion papers / Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung 1378.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2014b. The Politics and Economics of Cross-Border Electricity Infrastructure: A Framework for Analysis. Energy Research & Social Science 4: 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schäfer, Maximilian. 2016. Atomkraft-Risiko: Wann fliegt das nächste AKW in die Luft? Spiegel, July 6.Google Scholar
  34. Seidler, Christoph and Stefan Schultz. 2016. Kleinstkraftwerke—Angriff der Atom-Zwerge. Spiegel, May 21.Google Scholar
  35. Spiegel Online. 2016a. Brief an Hollande. Dreyer fordert Abschaltung grenznaher Kernkraftwerke. Spiegel Online, March 5.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2016b. NRW klagt mit Städteregion gegen belgisches Atomkraftwerk. Spiegel Online, April 12.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2016c. Nach vorgetäuschten Kontrollen. Ministerium lässt Philippsburg wieder ans Netz. Spiegel Online, May 20.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2016d. Gundremmingen: Virus im Atomkraftwerk kam über USB-Stick. Spiegel Online, June 1.Google Scholar
  39. Stankiewicz, Piotr. 2013. Governing Energy Transitions in Post-communist Countries. The Case of Polish Nuclear Power Programme. In Technology Assessment and Policy Areas of Great Transitions, ed. Tomáš Michalek, Lenka Hebáková, Leonhard Hennen, Constanze Scherz, Linda Nierling and Julia Hahn, 215–222. Proceedings from the PACITA 2013 Conference in Prague, Technology Centre ASCR, Prague 2014.Google Scholar
  40. Sutowski, Michał. 2015. Kto rządzi polskim węglem. In Polski węgiel, ed. Edwin Bendyk, 173–227. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.Google Scholar
  41. Szulecki, Kacper. 2015. Renewable Energy. In Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Governance and Politics, ed. Philipp Pattberg and Fariborz Zelli, 416–422. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2016. When Energy Becomes Security: Copenhagen School Meets Energy Studies. Paper presented at the DIIS Research Seminar, Copenhagen, 16 June 2016.Google Scholar
  43. Szulecki, Kacper, Tomasz Borewicz, and Janusz Waluszko. 2015. A Brief Green Moment: The Emergence and Decline of Polish Anti-nuclear and Environmental Movement. Interface 7 (2): 27–48.Google Scholar
  44. Tusk, Donald. 2012. Tusk: Grad prezesem spółki? Ta nominacja ma charakter polityczny. Wprost, July 18. Available at: Accessed 26 June 2017.
  45. Wetzel, Daniel. 2014. Extreme Belastungsprobe für deutsches Stromnetz. Die Welt, June 6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kacper Szulecki
    • 1
  • Julia Kusznir
    • 2
  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Jacobs UniversityBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations