Advertisement

Engaging with Openness Through Common(s) Ground: Healthcare Innovation in the Networked Society

  • Mark Aakhus
  • Pär J. Ågerfalk
  • Kanika Samra
  • Håkan Ozan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 295)

Abstract

Hospitals have increasingly embraced their role as centers for innovation and much attention has focused on technology transfer, translational research and even social innovation. Here we explore how open innovation could be a viable strategy for health organizations in contemporary society with its reliance on advanced information and communication technology. The study focuses on (a) innovation centers in hospitals by examining two variables important to open innovation: (i) the direction of value creation and (ii) innovation form, and (b) the development of scenarios for open innovation in healthcare by engaged practitioners in the field. The findings suggest some noteworthy variation in form and direction of innovation for healthcare. Most notably, although innovation is attended to, open initiatives do not loom large today. However, we also see that the future may bring something completely different with a focus on healthcare rather than hospitals. The results suggest direction for future empirical work and strategy development for designing healthcare systems as well as for open innovation practice.

Keywords

Open innovation Communication Common ground Commons Healthcare 

References

  1. 1.
    Castells, M. (ed.): The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edenius, M., Keller, K., Lindblad, S.: Managing knowledge across boundaries in healthcare when innovation is desired. Knowl. Manag. E-Learn.: Int. J. 2(2), 134–153 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chesbrough, H.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chesbrough, H., Di Minin, A.: Open social innovation. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds.) New Frontiers in Open Innovation, pp. 169–188. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epstein, R.J.: Digitization and its discontents: future shock in predictive oncology. In: Seminars in Oncology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 60–64. WB Saunders (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lapão, L.V.: The future impact of healthcare services digitalization on health workforce: the increasing role of medical informatics. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 228, 675–679 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hood, L., Balling, R., Auffray, C.: Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches. Biotechnol. J. 7(8), 992–1001 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westbrook, J.I., Braithwaite, J., Gibson, K., Paoloni, R., Callen, J., Georgiou, A., Creswick, N., Robertson, L.: Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 9(1), 201 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A.: Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 82(5), e73–e86 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., West, H.: Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds.) New Frontiers in Open Innovation, pp. 281–294. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014). Chap. 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remneland Wikhamn, B., Wikhamn, W.: Structuring of the open innovation field. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 8(3), 173–185 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benkler, Y.: Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law J. 112(3), 369–446 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aakhus, M., Ågerfalk, P.J., Lyytinen, K.: Te’eni, D.: Symbolic action research in information systems: introduction to the special issue. MIS Q. 38(4), 1187–1200 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aakhus, M.: Deliberation digitized: designing disagreement space through communication-information services. J. Argum. Context 2(1), 101–126 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lundell, B., van der Linden, F.: Open source software as open innovation: experiences from the medical domain. In: Eriksson Lundström, J.S.Z., Wiberg, M., Hrastinski, S., Edenius, M., Ågerfalk, P.J. (eds.) Managing Open Innovation Technologies, pp. 3–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31650-0_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thorén, C., Ågerfalk, P.J., Edenius, M.: Through the printing press: an account of open practices in the swedish newspaper industry. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15(11), 779–804 (2014). Special Issue on Open InnovationGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aakhus, M.: Communication as design. Commun. Monogr. 74(1), 112–117 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jackson, S., Aakhus, M.: Becoming more reflective about the role of design in communication. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 42(2), 125–134 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clarke, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the qualitative–quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q. 36(1), 21–54 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ågerfalk, P.J.: Embracing diversity through mixed methods research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 251–256 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Aakhus
    • 1
  • Pär J. Ågerfalk
    • 2
  • Kanika Samra
    • 1
  • Håkan Ozan
    • 3
  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.KPMGStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations