Skip to main content

Why Heidegger Didn’t Like Catholic Theology: The Case of Romano Guardini

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Heidegger’s Black Notebooks and the Future of Theology
  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

Much of the content of the Black Notebooks relates to Heidegger’s irritation with what he saw as a range of misinterpretations and misappropriations of his work. These include those who see Being and Time as derivative of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche as well as those who try to apply Heidegger’s thought to contemporary philosophical issues. He is particularly hostile to Catholic theology, naming Romano Guardini as exemplifying what is wrong in such applications. This chapter explores Heidegger’s antipathy in relation to Guardini’s own theological-philosophical project with the aim of specifying just what Heidegger saw as the essential point at issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Works Cited

  • Guardini, Romano. Der Gegensatz, Versuche zu einer Philosophie des Lebendig-Konkrete. Mainz: Mathias Grünewald, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Hölderlin: Weltbild und Frömmigkeit. Leipzig: Jakob Hegner, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Letters from Lake Como. Explorations in Technology and the Human Race. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ‘Vom Wesen katholischer Weltanschauung’. In idem, Unterscheidung des Christlichen. Gesammelte Studien 1923–1963. Mainz: Mathias Grünewald, 1963, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. Hölderlins Hymne ‘Andenken’. GA 52. Edited by Curd Ochwadt. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Sein und Zeit (1927). GA 2. Edited by Friedrich Wilhelm von Herrman. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Überlegungen II–VI (Schwarze Hefte 1931–1938). GA 94. Edited by Peter Trawny. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, Theodore and Thomas Sheehan (eds). Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of His Early Occasional Writings. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Hugo. Martin Heidegger. A Political Life. Translated by Allan Blunden. London: Fontana, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, George. ‘Heidegger’s Hölderlin and Kierkegaard’s Christ’. In Stephen Mulhall (ed.), Martin Heidegger (International Library of Essays in the History of Social and Political Thought). Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006, 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Paul Silas. The Early Hans Urs von Balthasar: Historical Contexts and Intellectual Formation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pattison, G. (2017). Why Heidegger Didn’t Like Catholic Theology: The Case of Romano Guardini. In: Björk, M., Svenungsson, J. (eds) Heidegger’s Black Notebooks and the Future of Theology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64927-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics