Advertisement

Photographs, CCTVs and Other Cameras

  • Daniel Marshall
  • Terry Thomas
Chapter

Abstract

The police and other agencies take photographs and film of people and various activities; these images are retained for varying lengths of time. Cameras cover public areas and also the roads and highways. New technologies have enabled better images to be taken and smaller cameras to be used which can be worn on the clothing of police officers or mounted on flying drones. There is evidence that these developments have made a modest impact on crime levels and that when worn by police officers, video cameras make an overall improvement to police–public interactions. Concerns do remain, however, that databanks of photographs and images have been collated with the minimal of regulatory oversight, and this is an area that does require attention.

Bibliography

  1. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2004) Driving Down Crime: Denying Criminals the Use of the Road, London.Google Scholar
  2. ACPO (Association of Chief Police Officers) (2013) The Police Use of Automatic Number Plate Recognition, January, London.Google Scholar
  3. Ariel B, Farrar WA and Sutherland A (2014), The Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force and Citizens’ Complaints Against the Police: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3): 509–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC News (2006) Britain Is ‘Surveillance Society,’ 2 November (available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6108496.stm accessed 27 January 2017).
  5. BBC News (2014a) Leicestershire Police Trial Facial Recognition Software, 15 July (available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-28307938 accessed 31 October 2016).
  6. BBC News (2015c) ‘Innocent People’ on Police Photo’s Database, 3 February (available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31105678 accessed 31 October 2016).
  7. BBW (Big Brother Watch) (2012) Doncaster Joins the Audio-CCTV Club (Press Release) 31 July, London: BBW.Google Scholar
  8. BBW (Big Brother Watch) (2015) Body Worn Video Cameras, London: BBW.Google Scholar
  9. BBW (Big Brother Watch) (2016b) Reaction to the Publication of the Biometrics Commissioner’s Annual Report (Press Release) 11 March, London (available at https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/all-media/reaction-to-the-publication-of-the-biometrics-commissioners-annual-report/ accessed 20 March 2017).
  10. BBW (Big Brother Watch) (2017) Smile While You Are on Body Worn Camera: Part 1 – Local Authorities, February, London (available at https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Smile-you-are-on-Body-Worn-Camera-Part-1-1.pdf accessed 14 March 2017).
  11. Bud TA (2016) The Rise and Risks of Police Body-Worn Cameras in Canada. Surveillance and Society, 14(1): 117–121.Google Scholar
  12. Clout L (2007) Talking CCTV Gives Big Brother a Voice. Daily Telegraph, 4 April.Google Scholar
  13. CoE (Council of Europe) (2010) Parliamentary Assembly Prohibiting the Marketing and Use of the ‘Mosquito’ Youth Dispersal Device (Press Release) 12 July.Google Scholar
  14. College of Policing (2014a) Code of Ethics: A Code of Practice for the Principles and Standards of Professional Behaviour for the Policing Profession of England and Wales, July (available at http://www.college.police.uk/What-we-do/Ethics/Documents/Code_of_Ethics.pdf accessed 29 January 2017).
  15. College of Policing (2014c) Information Management: Management of Police Information, APP, 24 October (available at https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/information-management/management-of-police-information/ accessed 29 January 2017).
  16. College of Policing (2016d) Public Order: Tactical Options APP (available at: https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/public-order/planning-and-deployment/tactical-options/ accessed 6 May 2017).
  17. College of Policing (2016e) Investigation: ANPR (available at https://www.app.college.police.uk/app-content/investigations/investigative-strategies/investigative-strategiesanpr/#top accessed 14 February 2017).
  18. Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric Material (2016) Annual Report 2015, March, London: Office of the Biometric Commissioner.Google Scholar
  19. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1999) Proposed New Regulations on Number Plates, (Covering Letter to Consultation Exercise), 5 August (available at https://web.archive.org/web/20011224185632/http://www.roads.dtlr.gov.uk/vehicle/consult/numberplates/letter.htm accessed 15 February 2017).
  20. Ellis T, Jenkins C and Smith P (2015). Body-Worn Video: Evaluation of the Introduction of Personal Issue Body Worn Video Cameras (Operation Hyperion) on the Isle of Wight, Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth (available at https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/files/2197790/Operation_Hyperion_Final_Report_to_Hampshire_Constabulary.pdf accessed 26 February 2017).
  21. Gov.uk (2017a) Rules for Passport Photos, London (available at https://www.gov.uk/photos-for-passports accessed 20 March 2017).
  22. Greenfield SH (2014) ‘The Missing Video Presumption’, Simple Justice: A Criminal Defence Blog (available from http://blog.simplejustice.us/2014/03/30/the-missing-video-presumption/ accessed 23 August 2016).
  23. Grossmith L, Owens C, Finn W, Mann D, Davies T and Baika L (2015). Police, Camera, Evidence: London’s Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of Body Worn Video, London: College of Policing and the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC).Google Scholar
  24. Home Office (2007a) Guidance for the Police Use of Body-Worn Video Devices, Police and Crime Standards Directorate, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  25. Home Office (2007c) Plymouth Head Camera Project – Body-Worn Video Recording System (Head Cameras): National Pilot, Final Report, April 2007, London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  26. Home Office (2007d) Power of Search and Entry to Risk Assess Sex Offenders Subject to the Notification Requirements (Circular No. 17/2007) London.Google Scholar
  27. Home Office (2013d) Surveillance Camera Code of Practice, June, London: TSO.Google Scholar
  28. Home Office (2014f) Guidance on ANPR Performance Assessment and Optimisation, March, Publication No. 8/14, London.Google Scholar
  29. Home Office (2015f) Review of the Retention and Use of Biometric Material Provided by the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Home Office Response to Biometrics Commissioner Annual Report – available at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/publication-of-the-governments-response-to-the-biometrics-commissioners-first-annual-report accessed 27 September 2015).
  30. Home Office (2016c) Investigatory Powers Bill: Government Response to Pre-Legislative Scrutiny, Cm 9219, March, London.Google Scholar
  31. Home Office (2017b) PACE Code of Practice D Main methods Used by the Police to Identify People in Connection with the Investigation of Offences and the Keeping of Accurate and Reliable Criminal Records, London.Google Scholar
  32. Home Office, ACPO and PA Consulting Group (2004) Driving Crime Down: Denying Criminals the Use of the Road, October, London: TSO.Google Scholar
  33. House of Commons (2015d) Current and Future Use of Biometric Data and Technologies Science and Technology Committee, (6th Report of Session 2014–5), HC 734, February, London.Google Scholar
  34. ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office) (2014) Conducting Privacy Impact Assessment: Code of Practice, Wilmslow.Google Scholar
  35. ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office) (2015) In the Picture: A Data Protection Code of Practice for Surveillance Cameras and Personal Information, 21 May, Wilmslow.Google Scholar
  36. IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) (2010) Independent Investigation into the Use of ANPR in Durham, Cleveland and North Yorkshire from 23–26 October 2009 London (available at https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/investigation_commissioner_reports/ANPR%20Report%20to%20publish_1.pdf accessed 14 March 2017).
  37. James Z and Southern R (2007) Plymouth Head Camera Project: Public Relations Evaluation, Plymouth: SRRU.Google Scholar
  38. Katz CM, Choate DE, Ready JR and Nuno L (2014) Evaluating the Impact of Officer Worn Body Cameras in the Phoenix Police Department, Arizona State University: Center for Violence Prevention and Community Safety.Google Scholar
  39. Krol C (2015) Watch: World’s First 4K Camera Drone Unveiled at CES. Daily Telegraph, 8 January.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis P (2008) Straw Launches High-Visibility Community Punishment. The Guardian, 2 December.Google Scholar
  41. Lewis P (2010a) Surveillance Cameras in Birmingham Track Muslims Every Move. The Guardian, 4 June.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis P (2010b) Birmingham Stops Camera Surveillance in Muslim Areas. The Guardian, 17 June.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis P (2010c) CCTV in the Sky: Police Plan to Use Military-Style Spy Drones. The Guardian, 23 January.Google Scholar
  44. Liberty (2003) Liberty Wins Key CCTV Privacy Case (Press Release) 28 January (available at https://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/news/press-releases/liberty-wins-key-cctv-privacy-case accessed 15 February 2017).
  45. Liberty (2010a) Liberty Demands Removal of Unlawful Birmingham Surveillance Cameras (Press Release) 18 October.Google Scholar
  46. Lippert R (2009) Signs of the Surveillant Assemblage: Privacy, Regulation, Urban CCTV and Governmentality. Social and Legal Studies, 18(4): 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lippert RK and Newell BC (2016) Debate Introduction: The Privacy and Surveillance Implications of Police Body Cameras. Surveillance & Society, 14(1): 113–116.Google Scholar
  48. Little C (2015) The ‘Mosquito’ and the Transformation of British Public Space. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(2): 167–182.Google Scholar
  49. Manzoor S (2016) You Look Familiar: On Patrol with the Met’s Super-Recognisers. The Guardian, 5 November.Google Scholar
  50. Mathieson S (2007) Worried About Being Watched? You Already Are. The Guardian, 15 February.Google Scholar
  51. Mathieson S (2011) Open Up the Number Plate Recognition Camera System. The Guardian, 17 May.Google Scholar
  52. MIB (Motor Insurance Bureau) (2016) Chief Executive’s Blog – Vnuk – The Unintended Consequences of a Farmyard Misfortune, April (available at https://www.mib.org.uk/about-mib/chief-executives-blog/vnuk-the-unintended-consequences-of-a-farmyard-misfortune/ accessed 3 March 2017).
  53. Middlesbrough Council (2017) Security and Surveillance (available at https://www.middlesbrough.gov.uk/environment-and-public-protection/crime-and-emergencies/security-and-surveillance accessed 3 March 2017).
  54. MPS (Metropolitan Police Service) (2015c) Privacy Impact Assessment of the Deployment of Body Worn Video, Freedom of Information Request, London: MPS (available at http://www.met.police.uk/foi/pdfs/disclosure_2015/february_2015/2015010000985.pdf accessed 23 August 2016).
  55. Norris C and Armstrong G (1999) The Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  56. NPCC (National Police Chief’s Council) (2015) Automated Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) (Press Release) 14 December.Google Scholar
  57. NPCC (National Police Chief’s Council) (2016b) Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) – Factsheet, April (available at http://www.npcc.police.uk/documents/ANPR%20Factsheet.pdf accessed 14 February 2017).
  58. Office of the Biometrics Commissioner (2014) Annual Report 2014 Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric material, November, London: Office of the Biometrics Commissioner.Google Scholar
  59. Office of the Children’s Commissioner (2008) 3,500 Ultra-Sonic Dispersal Devises Told to Buzz Off (Press Release) 12 February, London.Google Scholar
  60. Owens C, Mann D and McKenna R (2014) The Essex BWV Trial: The Impact of BWV on Criminal Justice Outcomes of Domestic Abuse Incidents, London: College of Policing.Google Scholar
  61. Peachey P (2016) How the Police’s Body-Worn Camera Technology Is Changing the Justice System. The Independent, 1 March.Google Scholar
  62. Phelps JM, Strype J, Le Bellu S, Lahlou S and Aandal J (2016) Experiential Learning and Simulation-Based Training in Norwegian Police Education: Examining Body-Worn Video as a Tool to Encourage Reflection. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 10(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
  63. SCC (Surveillance Camera Commissioner) (2015) Surveillance Camera Commissioners Speech to the ANPR National User Group, (Delivered 18 November 2015), London: SCC (available at https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/surveillance-camera-commissioners-speech-to-the-anpr-national-user-group-2015 accessed 3 March 2017).
  64. SCC (Surveillance Camera Commissioner) (2016) Surveillance Camera Commissioner Annual Report 2015/16, London: TSO.Google Scholar
  65. Siddique H (2013) Cameras Offer Protection for Police and Public but Raise Privacy Concerns. The Guardian, 23 October.Google Scholar
  66. Surrey Police (2016) Police Acquire Four New Drones to Protect Public and Investigate Crime (Press Release) 8 April (available at https://surrey.police.uk/news/police-acquire-four-new-drones-to-protect-public-and-investigate-crime-1/ accessed 14 March 2017).
  67. Telegraph (2013) Police Body Cameras Would Be ‘Distressing’ for Public. Daily Telegraph, 15 November.Google Scholar
  68. Thames Valley Police (2010) Project Champion Review, 30 September (available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2010/oct/uk-project-champion-police-report.pdf accessed 15 February 2017).
  69. Travis A (2010b) ‘Big Brother’ Traffic Cameras Must Be Regulated, Orders Home Secretary. The Guardian, 4 July.Google Scholar
  70. Walker P (2017) Two UK Schools Trial Use of Police-Style Bodycams for Teachers. The Guardian, 8 February.Google Scholar
  71. Ward L (2007) 3,300 Sales and Rising – Ultrasonic Answer to Teenage Gangs Sets Alarm Bells Ringing. The Guardian, 17 March.Google Scholar
  72. Warman M (2012) Talking CCTV Cameras to Be Turned Off. Daily Telegraph, 6 February.Google Scholar
  73. Weaver M (2015) Warning of Backlash over Car Number Plate Camera Network. The Guardian, 27 November.Google Scholar
  74. Weaver M (2017a) Home Office Refuses to Enforce Privacy Code on NHS Staff Using Video. The Guardian, 18 January.Google Scholar
  75. Weaver M (2017b) G4S Filmed Asylum Seekers in Their Homes Without Consent. The Guardian, 24 January.Google Scholar
  76. Welsh B and Farrington D (2007) Closed-Circuit Television Surveillance and Crime Prevention – A Systematic Review, Report Prepared for The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, Stockholm (available at: http://www.crim.cam.ac.uk/people/academic_research/david_farrington/cctvsw.pdf accessed 21 March 2017).
  77. West Yorkshire Police (2016) Body Worn Cameras Increase Safety ‘Focus’ (Press Release) 8 August.Google Scholar
  78. West Yorkshire Police (2017a) ‘Caught on Camera’ (available at https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/camera-alerts/caught-on-camera accessed 17 February 2017).
  79. Williams C, Patterson J and Taylor J (2009) Police Filming English Streets in 1935: The Limits of Mediated Identification. Surveillance & Society, 6(1): 3–9.Google Scholar
  80. Wright S (2009) Drivers Who Break Law Warned by Police. Telegraph and Argus, 14 December (available at http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/local/localbrad/4791523._Ring_of_steel__on_roads_extended/ accessed 21 March 2017).
  81. Young A (1996) Imagining Crime, London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Marshall
    • 1
  • Terry Thomas
    • 2
  1. 1.School of LawLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.School of Social SciencesLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations