Advertisement

Introduction

  • Daniel Marshall
  • Terry Thomas
Chapter

Abstract

Examples of law enforcement and criminal justice encroachments on privacy include police ‘stop and search’, the use of ‘undercover’ police and the interception of telephone calls. It includes the taking of photographs by Automatic Number Plate Recognition roadside cameras and the maintenance of databases containing these pictures. Overcrowded prisons bring their own impact on privacy as does the wearing of electronic tags as a community punishment. Strategies and interventions to prevent acts of terrorism and the various restrictions on dissemination of personal information to assist former prisoners to resettle in the community, all have to tackle the problem of privacy. This chapter also discusses the definition of privacy itself and allied concepts such as information privacy and data protection.

Bibliography

  1. Bakir V, Cable J, Dencik HA and McStay A (2015) Public Feeling on Privacy, Security and Surveillance, ESRC, Bangor University and Cardiff University (available at https://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/dcssproject/files/2015/11/Public-Feeling-on-Privacy-Security-Surveillance-DATAPSST-DCSS-Nov2015.pdf accessed 16 April 2017).
  2. BBC News (2016a) Man Ordered to Tell Police If He Plans to Have Sex, 22 January (available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-35385227 accessed 25 July 2016).
  3. BBC News (2016b) 24-Hour Sex Ban Man John O’Neill ‘Lost Touch with Children,’ 19 July (available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-36833018 accessed 25 July 2016).
  4. BBW (Big Brother Watch) (2013) Online Privacy Survey: International Findings BBW/ComRes, London (available at https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/2013/06/new-research-global-attitudes-to-privacy-online/ accessed 16 April 2017).
  5. Calcutt Report (1990) Report of the Committee on Privacy and Related Matters, Cm1102, June, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. CoE (Council of Europe) (1950) European Convention on Human Rights, Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman D (1994) Secrecy, Dignity or Autonomy? Views of Privacy as a Civil Liberty. Current Legal Problems, 47(2): 41–71.Google Scholar
  8. Finnigan L (2016) Man Ordered to Give Police 24-Hour Notice Before Sex Has Order Lifted. Daily Telegraph, 23 September.Google Scholar
  9. Garton Ash T (2016a) Free Speech: Ten Principles for a Connected World, London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  10. House of Commons (2015a) Privacy and Security: A Modern and Transparent Legal Framework Intelligence and Security Committee, HC 1075, March, London.Google Scholar
  11. Lindop Report (1978) Report of the Committee on Data Protection, Cmnd. 7341, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  12. Lyon D (1994) The Electronic Eye, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. RUSI (Royal United Services Institute) (2015) A Democratic Licence to Operate: Report of the Independent Surveillance Review, 13 July, London.Google Scholar
  14. Sprenger P (1999) Sun on Privacy: ‘Get Over It’. Wired, 26 January (available at http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538 accessed 26 February 2017).
  15. UN (United Nations) (1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  16. Van Buskirk E (2010) Report: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Doesn’t Believe in Privacy. Wired, 28 April.Google Scholar
  17. Wacks R (1989) Personal Information, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Warren S and L Brandeis (1890) The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(193) 15 December.Google Scholar
  19. Younger Report (1972) Report of the Committee on Privacy, Cmnd. 5012, London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Marshall
    • 1
  • Terry Thomas
    • 2
  1. 1.School of LawLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.School of Social SciencesLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations