Advertisement

Developments in Practice: Methodologies and Approaches to Gender Budgeting

  • Elisabeth Klatzer
  • Tindara Addabbo
  • Gloria Alarcon-García
  • Angela O’Hagan
Chapter

Abstract

Offering an overview of distinctive methodological developments in gender budgeting (GB) and analysis of budget and public policy processes, this chapter discusses various approaches. It introduces examples of different applied and emerging methods for practical adoption and implementation of GB. While clearly visible conditions for the adoption and implementation of GB can be identified and characterised, sustaining gender analysis across the policy and budgetary process presents enduring challenges. This chapter sets out methodologies for attempting gender-responsive budgets and the various approaches adopted in divergent contexts.

References

  1. Addabbo, Tindara. 2016. Gender Budgeting in the Capability Approach. From Theory to Evidence. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 55–60. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Addabbo, Tindara, Caterina Arciprete, Mario Biggeri, and Antonella Picchio. 2017. Integrated Wellbeing Gender Budgeting from a Capability Approach Perspective: Evidences from Sénégal. Paper Submitted to the HDCA 2017 Conference: Challenging Inequalities: Human Development and Social Change.Google Scholar
  3. Addabbo, Tindara, Giovanna Badalassi, Francesca Corrado, and Antonella Picchio. 2011. A Social-Reproduction and Well-Being Approach to Gender Budgets: Experiments at Local Government Level in Italy. In Gender and Well-Being. The Role of Institutions, ed. Degavre Florence, John Eriksen, Elisabetta Addis, and Paloma de Villota, 105–124. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Addabbo, Tindara, and Gisella Facchinetti. 2013. Fuzzy Logic and the Capability Approach. CAP Paper, 106.Google Scholar
  5. Addabbo, Tindara, Maria Laura Di Tommaso, and Anna Maccagnan. 2014. Gender Differences in Italian Children’s Capabilities. Feminist Economics 20 (2): 90–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2015a. Education Capability: A Focus on Gender and Science. Social Indicators Research 128 (2): 793–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Addabbo, Tindara, Gisella Facchinetti, and Tommaso Pirotti. 2013. Being Healthy in Fuzzy Logic: The Case of Italy. In Computational Intelligence. Revised and Selected Papers of the International Joint Conference, IJCCI 2011, Paris, France, October 24–26, 2011, ed. K. Madani, A. Dourado, A. Rosa, and J. Filipe. Studies in Computational Intelligence (series), 197–212. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Addabbo, Tindara, Lina Gálvez-Muñoz, and Paula Rodríguez-Modroño. 2015b. Gender Budgeting in Education from a Wellbeing Approach: An Application to Italy and Spain. Politica Economica—Journal of Economic Policy XXXI (2): 195–212.Google Scholar
  9. Addabbo, Tindara, Diego Lanzi, and Antonella Picchio. 2010. Gender Budgets: A Capability Approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development 11 (4): 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Addabbo, Tindara, and Saltini Stefania. 2009. Gender auditing del Bilancio del Comune di Modena secondo l’approccio dello sviluppo umano. GenderCAPP, Research Report, May. www.capp.unimore.it. Accessed 12 May 2017.
  11. Alarcón-García, Gloria, Tindara Addabbo, Edgardo Ayala-Gaytan, Estela Fernandez-Sabiote, María Rubio-Aparicio, Andreu Castellet, Angela O’Hagan, José Manuel Mayor. 2016. Gender Equality, Infrastructure and Well-Being. Final Report. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality.Google Scholar
  12. Alarcón-García, Gloria, C. Arias, and José Colino. 2012. Infraestructuras y género. Revista de Investigaciones Feministas 2: 151–174.Google Scholar
  13. Alarcón-García, Gloria, and José Colino-Sueiras. 2011. La perspectiva de género en los gastos en infraestructuras públicas: los equipamientos educativos y deportivos en el FEIL. Presupuesto y Gasto Público 64: 155–178.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2013. Infrastructure and Gender: Right and Left, Mayors and Mayoresses. Wulfenia 20 (11): 423–461.Google Scholar
  15. Alarcón-García, Gloria, José Colino-Sueiras, and Andreu Castellet. 2015. Los gastos en infraestructuras públicas asociados a los servicios públicos desde la óptica de su contribución a la igualdad o la desigualdad de género. In La igualdad de género como eje de un nuevo modelo económico y social eficiente y sostenible: el cometido de las políticas públicas, edited by Gloria Alarcón-García. http://www.inmujer.gob.es/areasTematicas/estudios/estudioslinea2015/docs/LaigualdaddegeneroWeb.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2017.
  16. Alarcón-García, Gloria, and Estela Fernández-Sabiote. 2014. Gender, Well-Being, Budgeting and Public Infrastructure. Paper presented at the International Conference: Gender Responsive Budgeting: Theory and Practice in Perspective, Vienna University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303837589_Gender_well---being_budgeting_and_public_infrastructure
  17. Alarcón-García, Gloria, and Estela Fernandez-Sabiote. 2016. Well-Being and Infrastructure from a Gender Perspective Survey, WIGI Survey, Fiscal Observatory: The Analysis of Public Policies, University of Murcia. http://hdl.handle.net/10201/50228. Accessed 12 May 2017.
  18. Bauer, Tobias, and Beat Baumann. 1996. An den Frauen sparen? Eine Untersuchung zu den Auswirkungen der Sparpolitik von Bund, Kantonen und Gemeinden auf die Frauen. Bern: BASS.Google Scholar
  19. Boschini, Anne. 2017. Economic Gender Equality in Sweden. A Review of the Annex to the Government’s Budget Bill Regarding the Allocation of Economic Resources Between Men and Women. Presentation. https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/tietoaeduskunnasta/julkaisut/aineistot/Documents/Anne_Boschini.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  20. Budlender, Debbie, Diane Elson, Guy Hewitt, and Tanni Mukhopadhyay. 2002. Gender Budgets Make Cents. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  21. Canton Basel City. 2008. Gender-Responsive Budget Analysis in the Canton of Basel-Stadt. Basel.Google Scholar
  22. City of Vienna. 2016a. Gender Budgeting. In Voranschlag der Bundeshauptstadt Wien für das Jahr 2017, 235–295. https://www.wien.gv.at/finanzen/budget/va17/pdf/36.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  23. ———. 2016b. Gender Budgeting. In Rechnungsabschluss der Bundeshauptstadt Wien für das Jahr 2015, 329–386. https://www.wien.gv.at/finanzen/budget/ra15/pdf/46.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  24. Council of Europe. 2005. Gender Budgeting. Final Report of the Group of Specialists on Gender Budgeting (EG-S-GB). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2009. Gender Budgeting: Practical Implementation Handbook. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  26. De Villota, Paloma. 2016. The Spanish Central Government Budget. Comments on Recent Experience. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 71–79. Routledge: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  27. Diener, E., Shigehiro Oishi, and Richard Lucas. 2002. Subjective Well-Being. The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology, ed. C.R. Snyder and Shane J. López. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Downes, Ronnie, Lisa von Trapp, and Scherie Nicol. 2016. Gender Budgeting in OECD Countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting 2016/3: 1–37.Google Scholar
  29. Elson, Diane. 1999. Commonwealth Gender Responsive Budget Initiative: Background Papers. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2001. What is a Gender Responsive Budget Initiative? In Gender Budget Initiatives. Strategies, Concepts and Experiences, ed. Karen Judd, 15–29. New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  31. European Parliament. 2015. The Policy on Gender Equality in France. PE 510.024. Brussels.Google Scholar
  32. Färber, Christine. n.d. Evaluation der geschlechterbezogenen Ergebnisse. Kooperationsprojekt geschlechtersensibler Beteiligungshaushalt 2009/2010 der Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg und der Stadt Freiburg. Freiburg: Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar
  33. Frey, Regina. 2016. Interlinking Gender Responsiveness and Participation in Public Budgeting Processes. In Gender Responsive and Participatory Budgeting. Imperatives for Equitable Public Expenditure, ed. Cecilia Ng, 19–31. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Gualda, Jose, Buenaventura Aguilera, and Paula Cirujano. 2015. Progress in the Andalusian GRB Practice: Gender Budgeting Audits. Journal of Economic Policy 31: 253–271.Google Scholar
  35. Gunluk-Senesen, G. 2016. In Search of a Gender Budget with ‘Actual Allocation of Public Monies’: A Wellbeing Gender Budget Exercise. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 55–60. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Institute for the Equality of Women and Men. 2010. Manual for the Application of Gender Budgeting Within the Belgian Federal Administration. Brussels: Institute for the Equality of Women and Men.Google Scholar
  37. International Monetary Fund. 2017. Gender Budgeting in G7 Countries. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  38. Klatzer, Elisabeth. 2008. The Integration of Gender Budgeting in Performance-Based Budgeting. Paper presented at the International Conference Accountable Public Budgeting with Gender Equality, Bilbao, June 9–10.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2016. Integrating Gender Equality, Women’s Rights and Participation in the Budget Process: A Survey of Entry Points and Practical Examples. In Gender Responsive and Participatory Budgeting. Imperatives for Equitable Public Expenditure, ed. Cecilia Ng, 99–123. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Klatzer, Elisabeth, and Michaela Neumayr. 2006. Gender Budgeting in Europa. Vienna: AK Wien.Google Scholar
  41. Madörin, Mascha. 2007. Gender Responsive Budgeting Initiatives in Switzerland: Work in Progress. Bern: Federal Office for Gender Equality.Google Scholar
  42. OECD. 2016. Gender Budgeting in OECD Countries. Report for the 37th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials, Paris.Google Scholar
  43. O’Hagan, Angela. 2015. Favourable Conditions for the Adoption and Implementation of Gender Budgeting: Insights from Comparative Analysis. Politica Economica/Journal of Economic Policy XXXI/2: 233–252.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2016. Gender Budgeting in Scotland. Seeking Transformative Change Through Public Spending. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy, ed. Jim Campell and Morag Gillespie, 46–52. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Philipp-Raynaud, Francoise. 2002. The Yellow Budget Paper and Gender Equality in France. In Gender Budget Initiatives. Strategies, Concepts and Experiences, ed. Karen Judd, 136–139. New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  46. Quinn, Sheila. 2016. Europe: A Survey of Gender Budgeting Efforts. Working Paper WP/16/155. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  47. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2003. Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities. Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 61–92.Google Scholar
  48. Schratzenstaller, Margit. 2008. Gender Budgeting in Austria. CESifo DICE Report 6 (2): 44–51.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2014. Gender Impact Assessment. Exchange of Good Practices on Gender Equality Discussion Paper. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-quality/files/exchange_of_good_practices_at/at_discussion_paper_at_2014_en.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2017.
  50. Schubert-Lehnhardt, Viola. 2006. Implementierung von Verfahren des Gender Budgeting in einem Gesamtprozess partizipativer Haushaltsaufstellung am Beispiel des Berliner Stadtbezirkes Lichtenberg. Berlin: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.Google Scholar
  51. Scottish Government. 2016. Equality Statement: Scottish Draft Budget 2016–17.Google Scholar
  52. Sharp, Rhonda. 2003. Budgeting for Equity. Gender Budget Initiatives Within a Framework of Performance Oriented Budgeting. New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  53. Sharp, Rhonda, and Ray Broomhill. 1990. Women and Government Budgets. Australian Journal of Social Issues 25 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steger, Gerhard. 2010. Gender Budgeting, the Austrian Experience. Wien: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
  55. Stotsky, Janet. 2016. Gender Budgeting: Fiscal Context and Overview of Current Outcomes. International Monetary Fund Working Paper. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  56. UNIFEM. 2002. In Gender Budget Initiatives. Strategies, Concepts and Experiences, ed. Karen Judd. New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 2010. Gender-Responsive Budgeting in South Eastern Europe: UNIFEM Experiences. Bratislava: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  58. Upasna, Joshi. 2010. Subjective Well-Being by Gender. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies 1 (1): 20–26.Google Scholar
  59. Women’s Budget Group (WBG). 2017. Gender Impact Assessment of the Spring Budget 2017. http://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/WBG_Budget2017_Fullresponse-1.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2017.
  60. ———. n.d. Women’s Budget Group website. wbg.org.uk/. Accessed 12 May 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth Klatzer
    • 1
  • Tindara Addabbo
    • 2
  • Gloria Alarcon-García
    • 3
  • Angela O’Hagan
    • 4
  1. 1.Independent Researcher-Activist and International ConsultantFeminist Economics and Gender Responsive BudgetingViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Economics Marco Biagi and CAPPUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Taxation and Public FinanceUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain
  4. 4.Glasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations