Advertisement

Conceptual and Institutional Origins of Gender Budgeting

  • Angela O’Hagan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter charts the historical development of gender budgeting as it travelled into use in Europe and critically engages in the different conceptual origins and definitions. First given institutional support within the Platform for Action of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing 1995, a normative framework has developed across European countries but arguably gender budgeting has been variously and weakly implemented.

This analysis draws together arguments for gender budgeting as feminist policy change and the institutional resistances encountered in advancing such transformative change, as highlighted in concepts from feminist policy analysis, feminist institutionalism, and feminist economics.

References

  1. Annesley, Claire. 2010. Gender, Politics and Policy Change: The Case of Welfare Reform Under New Labour. Government and Opposition 45 (1): 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annesley, Claire, and Francesca Gains. 2012. Investigating the Economic Determinants of the UK Gender Equality Policy Agenda. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (1): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beigewum. 2002. Frauen macht Budgets. Staatsfinanzen aus Geschlechterperspektive. Vienna: Mandelbaum Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Budlender, Debbie. 1996. The Women’s Budget. Cape Town: Idasa.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1998. The South African Women’s Budget Initiative. Background Paper No. 2. Meeting on Women and Political Participation: 21st Century Challenges, United Nations Development Programme, 24–26 March 1999. New Delhi, India. Community Agency for Social Enquiry. Cape Town: South Africa.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2000. The Political Economy of Women’s Budgets in the South. World Development 28 (7): 1365–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2004. Expectations Versus Realities in Gender-Responsive Budget Initiatives. New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
  9. Budlender, Debbie, and Guy Hewitt, eds. 2002. Gender Budgets Make Cents. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  10. Calgay, Gulay. 2010. Multiple Meanings of Gender Budgeting: Gender Knowledge and Economic Knowledge in the World Bank and UNDP. In Gender Knowledge and Knowledge Networks in International Political Economy, ed. Brigitte Young and Christoph Scherrer. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  11. Çağatay, Nilüfer, Mümtaz Keklik, Radhika Lal, and James Lang. 2000. Budgets as If People Mattered: Democratizing Macroeconomic Policies. In Social Development and Poverty Elimination Division, Bureau of Development Policy. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  12. Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola, and Mona Lena Krook. 2008. Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation. Representation 44 (2): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chappell, Louise. 2002. The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists. Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2006. Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness’. Politics and Gender 2 (2): 223–235.Google Scholar
  15. Chappell, Louise, and Jill Vickers. 2011. Introduction. Politics & Gender 7 (2): 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Council of Europe. 2005. Council of Europe Final Report of Group of Specialists on Gender Budgeting. Strasbourg: Directorate of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1215219&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&BackColorIntranet=EDB021&BackColorLogged=F5D383.asp.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2007. Council of Europe Recommendation on Gender Equality Standards and Mechanisms. Strasbourg: Directorate of Human Rights, Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  18. Downes, Ronnie, Lisa von Trapp, and Scherie Nicol. 2016. Gender Budgeting in OECD Countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting 2016 (3): 1–37.Google Scholar
  19. Elson, Diane. 1997. Gender-Neutral, Gender-Blind, or Gender-Sensitive Budgets? Changing the Conceptual Framework to Include Women’s Empowerment and the Economy of Care. Preparatory Country Mission to Integrate Gender into National Budgetary Policies and Procedures in the Context of Economic Reform. Background Paper. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1999. Gender Budget Initiative: Background Papers. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2002. Gender Budget Initiatives. In Gender Budget Initiatives Strategies, Concepts and Experiences. Papers from a High Level International Conference ‘Strengthening Economic and Financial Governance Through Gender Responsive Budgeting’ Brussels, 16–18 October 2001. United Nations Development Fund for Women. Available at http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/media/publications/unifem/genderbudgetinitiativeseng.pdf?vs=1011. Accessed 26 June 2017.
  22. ———. 2016. Gender Budgeting and Macro Economic Policy. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 29–40. Abingdon: Routledge IAFFE Advances in Feminist Economics.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. 2003. Opinion of European Commission Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://www.lex.unict.it/eurolabor/documentazione/altridoc/po/opinion_may03.pdf
  24. ———. 2012. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm
  25. European Parliament. 2003. Resolution on Gender Budgeting – Building Public Budgets from a Gender Perspective. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDocdo?type=REPORT&reference=A5-2003-0214&language=EN
  26. Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2012. Making Fair Financial Decisions an Assessment of HM Treasury’s 2010 Spending Review Conducted Under Section 31 of the 2006 Equality Act. Manchester: EHRC.Google Scholar
  27. Frey, Regina. 2008. Paradoxes of Gender Budgeting. In The First International Conference on GRB and Social Justice, DP, vol. 14.Google Scholar
  28. Heclo, Hugh, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1981. The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy Inside British Politics. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Hepple, Bob. 2014. Equality: The Legal Framework. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Himmelweit, Susan. 2002. Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy. Feminist Economics 8 (1): 49–70.Google Scholar
  31. Hofbauer Balmori, H. 2003. Gender and Budgets: Overview Report. Institute of Development. Brighton: BRIDGE.Google Scholar
  32. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  33. Klatzer, Elisabeth. 2006. The Role of Parliaments in Gender Budgeting. “The Role of Parliamentary Commitees in Mainstreaming Gender and Promoting the Status of Women” Seminar for Members of Parliamentary Bodies Dealing with Gender Equality, 4–6 December 2006, Inter-Parliamentary Union, Geneva.Google Scholar
  34. Krafchik, W., and J. Wehner. 1998. The Role of Parliament in the Budget Process. South African Journal of Economics 66 (4): 512–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krook, Mona Lena, and Fiona Mackay. 2010. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Krug, Barbara, and Irene Van Staveren. 1999. Gender Audit: Whim or Voice. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Faculteit Bedrijfskunde/Rotterdam School of Management.Google Scholar
  37. Lorber, Judith. 2000. Using Gender to Undo Gender: A Feminist Degendering Movement. Feminist Theory 1 (1): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. Gendering Research in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 1333–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Mackay, Fiona, Meryl Kenny, and Louise Chappell. 2010. New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marks Rubin, Marilyn, and John R. Bartle. 2005. Integrating Gender into Government Budgets: A New Perspective. Public Administration Review 65 (3): 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKay, Ailsa. 2004. Developing a Gender Budget Initiative: A Question of Process or Policy? Lessons Learned from the Scottish Experience. Gender Studies 4.Google Scholar
  44. O’Hagan, Angela. 2016. Challenging the Norms: Gender Budgeting as Feminist Policy Change. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay. Routledge IAFFE Advances in Feminist Economics, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 41–49. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Quinn, Sheila. 2016. Europe: A Survey of Gender Budgeting Efforts. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/155. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  46. Rees, Teresa. 2006. Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Rubery, Jill. 2005. Reflections on Gender Mainstreaming: An Example of Feminist Economics in Action? Feminist Economics 11 (3): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sawer, Marion. 2002. Australia: The Mandarin Approach to Gender Budgets. In Gender Budgets Make More Cents, 43–64. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  50. Sen, Gita. 2000. Gender Mainstreaming in Finance Ministries. World Development 28 (7): 1379–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharp, Rhonda. 2003. Budgeting for Equity: Gender Budget Initiatives Within a Framework of Performance Oriented Budgeting. New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM).Google Scholar
  52. Sharp, Rhonda, and Ray Broomhill. 2002. Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience. Feminist Economics 8 (1): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharp, Rhonda, and Sanjugta Vas Dev. 2004. Bridging the Gap Between Gender Analysis and Gender-Responsive Budgets: Key Lessons from a Pilot Project in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Magill: Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  54. Stewart, Jenny. 2006. Value Conflict and Policy Change. Review of Policy Research 23 (1): 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stotsky, Janet. 2016. Gender Budgeting: Fiscal Context and Overview of Current Outcomes. International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/16/149. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  56. United Nations. 1995. Platform for Action. Fourth World Conference on Women: Action for Equality, Development and Peace. Beijing, September 1995. Available at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform
  57. Verloo, Meike, and Emanuela Lombardo. 2007. Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach. In Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, 21–49. New York: CEU Press.Google Scholar
  58. Waring, Marilyn. 1989. If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1964. Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela O’Hagan
    • 1
  1. 1.Glasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations