Valuing Product Lifecycle Management

  • Christopher Scheubel
  • Philipp Bierschneider
  • Holger Gierse
  • Ralf Hermann
  • Michael Wokusch
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

In the first section of this chapter, we provide some background and essential information on product lifecycle management. First, we describe the concept of product lifecycle management (PLM) and analyze the influence of this concept on the value chain of product development. Subsequently, the potential value creation by means of product lifecycle management is presented, and the main value drivers of the concept are emphasized. In the next section, the cost related to implementing product lifecycle management is broken down. As this matter concerns IT investments, the concept of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is introduced. The following section describes the benefits, costs and challenges which are related to the implementation of the Siemens PLM Software Suite®. It describes the general implementation process of adopting the Siemens PLM environment. Subsequently the findings are illustrated with the example of a Siemens business unit which implemented PLM throughout the lifecycle of their products. The case study illustrates our theoretical considerations with real business cases. The chapter concludes with a summary of findings and provides an outlook on future evolution in product lifecycle management.

References

  1. Barczak, G., Abbie, G., & Kenneth, B. K. (2009). Perspective: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chandrasegaran, S. K., Ramani, K., Sriram, R. D., Horváth, I., Bernard, A., Ramy, F. H., & Wei, G. (1991). The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Design, 45(2), 204–228 (2013).Google Scholar
  3. David, J. S., Schuff, D., & St Louis, R. (2002). Managing your total IT cost of ownership. Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durmuşoğlu, S., & Barczak, G. (2011). The use of information technology tools in new product development phases: Analysis of effects on new product innovativeness, quality, and market performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehrlenspiel, K., & Meerkamm, H. (2013). Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit (Vol. 5). München: Hanser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eigner, M., & Stelzer, R. (2009). Product lifecycle management: Ein Leitfaden für product development und life cycle management. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellram, L. M., & Sue, P. S. (1998). Total cost of ownership: A key concept in strategic cost management decisions. Journal of Business Logistics, 19, 55–84.Google Scholar
  8. Elsener, M. (2005). Kostenmanagement in der IT: Leistungssteigerung und Kostenoptimierung; Kostentreiber erkennen und eliminieren; total cost of ownership, outsourcing, service level agreements, benchmarking; Methoden zur Kostensenkung und Effizienzsteigerung. Frechen: mitp-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrin, B. G., & Plank, R. E. (2002). Total cost of ownership models: An exploratory study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(2), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geißdörfer, K. (2009). Total cost of ownership (TCO) und life cycle costing (LCC): Einsatz und Modelle: ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und USA (Vol. 7). Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Li, J., Tao, F., & Thao, L. (2015). Big data in product lifecycle management. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(1–4), 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martens, B., Walterbusch, M., & Teuteberg, F. (2012). Costing of cloud computing services: A total cost of ownership approach. System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on IEEE.Google Scholar
  13. McManus, H. L. (2005). Product development value stream mapping (PDVSM) manual release 1.0. Google Scholar
  14. Meckbach, G. (1998). Study reveals organizations blase about TCO. Computing Canada, 24(43), 15–16.Google Scholar
  15. Myers, B. A. (1998). A brief history of human-computer interaction technology. ACM Interactions, 5(2), 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1–18.Google Scholar
  17. Potter, K., Smith, M., Guevara, J. K., Hall, L., & Stegman, E. (2011). IT metrics: IT spending and staffing report 2011. Stamford: Gartner Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Ross, D. T., & Rodriguez, J. G. (1963). Theoretical foundations for the computer-aided design system. Proceedings of the May 21–23, 1963, Spring Joint Computer Conference, ACM.Google Scholar
  19. Srinivasan, V. (2011). An integration framework for product lifecycle management. Computer-Aided Design, 43(5), 464–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stark, J. (2015). Product lifecycle management (pp. 1–29). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Vila, C., Abdellán-Nebot, J. V., Albiñana, J. C., & Hernández, G. (2015). An approach to sustainable product lifecycle management (Green PLM). Procedia Engineering, 123, 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wiesner, S., Freitag, M., Westphal, I., & Thoben, K. D. (2015). Interactions between service and product lifecycle management. Procedia CIRP, 30, 36–41 (2016).Google Scholar
  23. Wild, M., & Herges, S. (1998). Total cost of ownership (TCO) – Ein Überblick. Management, 1, 34–38.Google Scholar
  24. Zarnekow, R., Brenner, W., & Scheeg, J. (2004). Untersuchung der Lebenszykluskosten von IT-Anwendungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 46(3), 181–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Scheubel
    • 1
  • Philipp Bierschneider
    • 2
  • Holger Gierse
    • 3
  • Ralf Hermann
    • 4
  • Michael Wokusch
    • 4
  1. 1.TUM School of Management, TU MünchenMünchenGermany
  2. 2.DF FA SE DS DI, Siemens AGFürthGermany
  3. 3.DF CP S&MK BA, Siemens AGFürthGermany
  4. 4.GS IT DE PRG, Siemens AGFürthGermany

Personalised recommendations