Skip to main content

Performance Analysis for Sentiment Techniques Evaluation Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2017 (AISI 2017)

Abstract

This paper presents proposed performance criteria evaluation based on a comparison between sentiment techniques. The target is measuring the sentiments performance through several significant perspectives in sentiment analysis. This measurement is very tight of accuracy evaluating for sentiments. However, evaluating sentiments is a hard challenge for language technologies, and achieving good results is much more difficult than some human think. Also, we introduce a comprehensive study for different sentiment techniques based on proposed performance criteria. The performance evaluation plays a vital role in accuracy measurement through a sentiment analysis word level. The performance criteria include two types of performance measurement namely F-measure and Runtime. These criteria include the balance of performance perspectives priorities. These types include a relationship between perspectives of performance to improve it. There are different performance perspectives: F-measure and speed of run time, memorability, and sentiment analysis challenges. It helps in understanding the contextual meaning and getting a score in less time and higher accuracy. The comparisons are based on the sentiment analysis word-level. They can understand some phrases as do not directly through caring with the classification of reviews. Finally, we show the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bing, L.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bing, L.: Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity. In: Nitin, I., Fred, J. (eds.) Handbook of Natural Language Processing. Machine Learning & Pattern Recognition Series, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erik, B., Pieter, H., Koen, D.: Automatic sentiment analysis in on-line text. In: Proceedings ELPUB2007 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Vienna, Austria, June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steven, B., Ewan, K., Edward, L.: Natural Language Processing with Python, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media Publisher, Sebastopol (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Haseena, R.P.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis - challenges and applications. Int. J. Appl. Innov. Eng. Manag. (IJAIEM) 3(5), May 2014, ISSN 2319–4847 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy, D., Carroll, J.: Disambiguating Nouns, Verbs, and Adjectives Using Automatically Acquired Selectional Preferences. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turney, P.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  8. Georgios, P., Mike, T.: More than bag-of-words: sentence-based document representation for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Hissar, Bulgaria, pp. 546–552, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yuya, Y., Tomoharu, I., Hiroshi, S.: Latent Support Measure Machines for Bag-of-Words Data Classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. El-Din, D.M., Mokhtar, H.M.O., Ismael, O.: Online paper review analysis. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. (IJACSA) 6(9) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ELS: A word-level method for entity-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceeding WIMS 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. ACM, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richard, S., Alex, P., Jean, Y.W., Jason, C., Christopher, D.M., Andrew, Y.N., Christopher, P.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Narayanan, V., Arora, I., Bhatia, A.: Fast and accurate sentiment classification using an enhanced Naive Bayes model. In: Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning IDEAL. Department of Electronics Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_24

  14. Doaa, M.E.: Enhancement bag-of-words model for solving the challenges of sentiment analysis. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(1),·January 2016. doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070134

    Google Scholar 

  15. Torralba, P., Phillip, I., Devi, P., Aude, O.: Isola understanding the intrinsic memorability of images. J. Vis. 12(9), August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cassani, G., Grimm R., Gillis S., Daelemans W.: Constraining the search space in cross-situational word learning: different models make different predictions. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2016). ISBN 978-0-9911967-3-9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Doaa, M.E.M.: A survey on sentiment analysis challenges. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002

  18. Samih,Y., Erdogan,Y.,& Halife, K., “Tagging Accuracy Analysis on Part-of-Speech Taggers”, Journal of Computer and Communications, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rugved, D., Ketan, V., Suratsingh, R., Tushar, J.: Comparative study of document similarity algorithms and clustering algorithms for sentiment analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJETTCS) 3(5), September–October 2014. ISSN 2278-6856

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joseph, V.H., Paul, J.K.: A Comparison of the relational database model and the associative database model. Issues Inf. Syst. X(1) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Efthymios, K., Theresa, W., Johanna, M.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the OMG! In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doaa Mohey El-Din Mohamed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mohamed, D.M.ED., El-din, M.H.N. (2018). Performance Analysis for Sentiment Techniques Evaluation Perspectives. In: Hassanien, A., Shaalan, K., Gaber, T., Tolba, M. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2017. AISI 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 639. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64861-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64861-3_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64860-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64861-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics