Advertisement

The History and Theory of Camp

  • Katrin Horn
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a historical overview of how camp has evolved from a primarily private code of secret communication to a deconstructive method of cultural critique. It traces theories of camp from Isherwood and Sontag’s early reflections, via concepts of “mass camp” and pop art, to studies rooted in contemporary queer theory. Based on this framework, the chapter offers its own original definition of camp as a mode of “detached attachment.” Emphasizing camp’s communal dimensions, it builds on Hutcheon’s discursive communities of ironic exchanges and connects them with Sedgwick’s notion of “camp-recognition” as a shared “perverse” angle. The chapter also provides a differentiated understanding of the terms queer, lesbian, and feminist camp, which clearly distinguishes between camp’s variable media contexts and its durable politics.

Works Cited

  1. Babuscio, Jack. “Camp and Gay Sensibility.” Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Ed. David Bergman. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993. 19–37.Google Scholar
  2. Banis, Victor J., and Fabio Cleto, ed. That Man from C.A.M.P: Rebel without a Pause. New York: Harrington Park, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Benshoff, Harry M. “Movies and Camp.” American Cinema of the 1960s: Themes and Variations. Ed. Barry Keith Grant. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2008. 150–171.Google Scholar
  4. Bergman, David. “Introduction.” Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Ed. David Bergman. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993. 1–16.Google Scholar
  5. Booth, Mark. “CAMPE-TOI! On the Origins and Definitions of Camp.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject – A Reader. Ed. Fabio Cleto. Edinburgh: UP, 2008. 66-79.Google Scholar
  6. Bronski, Michael. Culture Clash: The Making of Gay Sensibility. Boston: South End, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Camp. Dir. Andy Warhol. 1965. Museum of Modern Art, New York City.Google Scholar
  9. Case, Sue-Ellen. “Toward a Butch-Femme Aesthetic.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject – A Reader. Ed. Fabio Cleto. Edinburgh: UP, 2008. 185–99.Google Scholar
  10. Castle, Terry. “Some Notes on ‘Notes on Camp’.” The Scandal of Susan Sontag. Eds. Barbara Ching and Jennifer A. Wagner-Lawlor. New York: Columbia UP, 2009. 21–31.Google Scholar
  11. Cleto, Fabio. “Gender, and Other Spectacles.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject – A Reader. Ed. Fabio Cleto. Edinburgh: UP, 2008. 202–06.Google Scholar
  12. ———. “Queering the Camp.” Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject – A Reader. Ed. Fabio Cleto. Edinburgh: UP, 2008. 1–42.Google Scholar
  13. Cohan, Steven. Incongruous Entertainment: Camp, Cultural Value, and the MGM Musical. Durham: Duke UP, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. ———. “Queer Eye for the Straight Guise: Camp, Postfeminism, and the Fab Five’s Makeovers of Masculinity.” Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Eds. Yvonne Tasker and Diane Negra. Durham: Duke UP, 2007. 176–200.Google Scholar
  15. Denisoff, Dennis. Aestheticism and Sexual Parody: 1840–1940. Cambridge: CUP, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Devitt, Rachel E. “Girl on Girl: Fat Femmes, Bio-Queens, and Redefining Drag.” Queering the Popular Pitch. Eds. Sheila Whiteley and Jennifer Rycenga. New York: Routledge, 2006. 27–39.Google Scholar
  17. Doty, Alexander. Flaming Classics: Queering the Film Canon. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. Dyer, Richard. “It’s So Camp as Keeps us Going.” The Culture of Queers. Ed. Richard Dyer. London: Routledge, 2002. 49–63.Google Scholar
  19. Farmer, Brett. Spectacular Passions: Cinema, Fantasy, Gay Male Spectatorships. Durham: Duke UP, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. Feil, Ken. “Ambiguous Sirk-Camp-Stances: Gay Camp and the 1950’s Melodramas of Douglas Sirk.” Spectator 15.1 (1994): 30–49.Google Scholar
  21. ———. “‘Talk About Bad Taste’: Camp, Cult, and the Reception of What’s New Pussycat?Convergence, Media, History. Eds. Janet Staiger and Sabine Hake. New York: Routledge, 2009. 139–51.Google Scholar
  22. Gaines, Malik, and Alex Segade. “Séance in the Dark Theater: Further Notes on the Death of Camp.” The Journal of Aesthetics Protest. 2006. 17 Feb 2010, http://www.journalofaestheticsandprotest.org/new3/segadegaines.html.
  23. Galef, Harold, and David Galef. “What was Camp.” Studies in Popular Culture 13.2 (1991): 11–25.Google Scholar
  24. Gill, Rosalind. “Postfeminism.” The International Encyclopedia of Communication. 2008. Blackwell. 13 Apr 2012, http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g978140513199Lchunk_g97814051319952Lss90-1.
  25. Gould, Deborah B. Moving Politics: Emotion and Act Up’s Fight against AIDS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, W. C. Queer Externalities: Hazardous Encounters in American Culture. Albany: SUNY P, 2009.Google Scholar
  27. Hebdige, Dick. “Fabulous Confusion: Pop Before Pop?” Visual Culture. Repr. Ed. Chris Jenks. London: Routledge, 2002. 96–123.Google Scholar
  28. Hemmings, Clara. “Rescuing Lesbian Camp.” Journal of Lesbian Studies 11.1 (2007): 159–166.Google Scholar
  29. Hutcheon, Linda. A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. New York: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
  30. ———. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
  31. Isherwood, Christopher. The World in the Evening. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Jagose, Annamarie. “Queer Theory.” Australian Humanities Review. 1996. 20 Jul 2011, http://www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-Dec-1996/jagose.html.
  33. Jameson, Fredric. “Postmodernism and Consumer Society.” Postmodernism and its Discontents. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. London: Verso, 1988. 13–29.Google Scholar
  34. Katz, Jack. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. Klinger, Barbara. Melodrama and Meaning: History, Culture, and the Films of Douglas Sirk. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1994.Google Scholar
  36. LaValley, Al. “The Great Escape.” Out in Culture: Gay, Lesbian, and Queer Essays on Popular Culture. Eds. Corey K. Creekmur and Alexander Doty. London: Cassell, 1995. 60–70.Google Scholar
  37. Long, Scott. “The Loneliness of Camp.” Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality. Ed. David Bergman. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993. 78–91.Google Scholar
  38. Medhurst, Andy. “Batman, Deviance and Camp.” The Many Lives of the Batman: Critical Approaches to a Superhero and his Media. Ed. Roberta E. Pearson. New York: Routledge, 1991. 149–163.Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, Moe. “Introduction: Reclaiming the Discourse of Camp.” The Politics and Poetics of Camp. Ed. Moe Meyer. London: Routledge, 1994. 1–20.Google Scholar
  40. Mistry, Reena. “Madonna and Gender Trouble.” theory.org.uk, Jan 2000. Communications and Media Research Institute (CAMRI), University of Westminster. Ed. David Gauntlett. 8 Oct 2010, http://www.theory.org.uk/madonna.htm.
  41. Newton, Esther. Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1979.Google Scholar
  42. Padva, Gilad. “Priscilla Fights Back: The Politicization of Camp Subculture.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 24.2 (2000): 216–43.Google Scholar
  43. Pellegrini, Ann. “After Sonntag: Future Notes on Camp.” Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies. Eds. George E. Haggerty and Molly McGarry. Malden: Blackwell, 2007. 168–193.Google Scholar
  44. Richardson, John Adkins. “Dada, Camp, and the Mode called Pop.” Pop Art: A Critical History. Ed. Steven Henry Madoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997. 154–161.Google Scholar
  45. Robertson, Pamela. Guilty Pleasures: Feminist Camp from Mae West to Madonna. London: Tauris, 1996.Google Scholar
  46. Sconce, Jeffrey. “‘Trashing the Academy’: Taste, Excess, and an Emerging Politics of Cinematic Style.” Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. 6th ed. Eds. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: OUP, 2006. 534–53.Google Scholar
  47. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Updated with a new preface. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  48. Shuker, Roy. Understanding Popular Music. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
  49. Smelik, Anneke. “Gay and Lesbian Criticism.” The Oxford Guide to Film Studies. Eds. John Hill and Pamela Church Gibson. Oxford: OUP, 1998.Google Scholar
  50. Smith, Patricia Juliana. “Icons and Iconoclasts: Figments of Sixties Queer Culture.” The Queer Sixties. Ed. Patricia Juliana Smith. New York: Routledge, 1999. xii–xxvi.Google Scholar
  51. Sontag, Susan. “Notes on Camp.” Against Interpretation, and Other Essays. New York: Picador, 2001. 275–292.Google Scholar
  52. ———. with Robert Boyars and Maxine Bernstein. “The Salmagundi Interview.” A Susan Sontag Reader. Ed. Susan Sontag. New York: Vintage, 1983. 339–346.Google Scholar
  53. Suárez, Juan Antonio. Bike Boys, Drag Queens & Superstars: Avant-garde, Mass Culture, and Gay Identities in the 1960s Underground Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1996.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, Joe A. “Pop Art.” The Queer Encyclopedia of the Visual Arts. Ed. Claude J. Summers. San Francisco: Cleis, 2004. 264–265.Google Scholar
  55. Tinkcom, Matthew. Working like a Homosexual: Camp, Capital, and Cinema. Durham: Duke UP, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American StudiesFAU Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations