Skip to main content

Between Friendship and Self-sufficiency. The Possibility of “Human Flourishing” in the Relationship Between Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics: A Multifocal Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aristotle’s Practical Philosophy
  • 445 Accesses

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the link between friendship and self-sufficiency in Aristotle’s ethical and political works. Friendship and self-sufficiency are needed in order to achieve happiness, which consists in the full actualization of the good possibilities inscribed in human nature. It is the irreducible complexity of human nature that gives origin to opposite (but not contradictory) statements in Aristotle’s texts, according to which in one sense, human beings, different from gods, cannot be happy alone; but in another sense, from the point of view of his intellect (nous), the divine part in human nature man can be happy alone. The different points of view adopted by Aristotle allow for the application of different – even opposite – theoretical frames, or for what I would like to call a ‘multifocal approach’: from different point of views, Aristotle can thus be said to maintain that for a human being to be happy, he or she needs both friendship and self-sufficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Fermani 2012; Fermani and Giovanola 2013, 273–287; Fermani 2014, 241–259.

  2. 2.

    See, e.g., Met. 4.2 1003a33.

  3. 3.

    For friendship see also Irrera, in this volume.

  4. 4.

    On happiness see also Irrera, in this volume.

  5. 5.

    The translation of the Nicomachean Ethics used in this chapter is based on Rackham’s, with modifications.

  6. 6.

    The translation of the Politics used here is based on Rackham’s, with modifications.

  7. 7.

    Berti 2003, 137.

  8. 8.

    See further the Indice ragionato dei concetti in Aristotele 2008, 12301232.

  9. 9.

    Mazzarelli in Aristotele 1996, 31.

  10. 10.

    Gastaldi 2003, 179.

  11. 11.

    The translation of the Eudemian Ethics used in this chapter is based on Rackham’s, with modifications.

  12. 12.

    Cf. Cattanei et al. 2016.

  13. 13.

    Cf. Trottmann 1996, 312: “Le réalisme aristotélicien en est bien conscient, et c’est pourquoi l’Éthique à Nicomaque est prolongée par la Politique. L’exercise de la contemplation est encore réservé à une élite qui est elle-même soumise aux besoins matériels du corps, à ceux spirtuels de la communication humaine.”

  14. 14.

    Jost 2002, 26.

References

  • Aristotle. 1926. The Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1932. Politics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1935. Eudemian Ethics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996 [1993]. Etica Nicomachea. Trans. C. Mazzarelli. Milan: Rusconi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotele. 2008. Le tre Etiche. Ed. Maurizio Migliori. Trans. Arianna Fermani. Milan: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti, Enrico. 2003. Le emozioni dell’amicizia e la filosofia. In La filosofia e le emozioni, ed. Pasquale Venditti, 137–153. Florence: Le Monnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattanei, Elisabetta, Arianna Fermani, and Maurizio Migliori, eds. 2016. By the Sophists to Aristotle through Plato. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermani, Arianna. 2012. L’etica di Aristotele. Brescia: Morcelliana.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. To kakon pollachôs legetai: the plurivocity of the notion of evil in Aristotelian Ethics. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Aristotle, ed. Claudia Baracchi, 241–259. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermani, Arianna, and Benedetta Giovanola. 2013. Ethics, Economic Organizations and Human Flourishing. Lessons from Plato and Aristotle. In Leadership Through the Classics, ed. Gregory P. Prastacos, Fuming Wang, and Klas Eric Soderquist, 273–287. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastaldi, Silvia. 2003. Bios hairetotatos: generi di vita e felicità in Aristotele. Naples: Bibliopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, Lawrence. 2002. Introduction. Apeiron 35(4): ix–xxxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trottmann, Christian. 1996. Le nœud de l’anthropologie aristotélicienne: ses conséquences théologiques et politiques. Revue thomiste 96: 312–326.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arianna Fermani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fermani, A. (2017). Between Friendship and Self-sufficiency. The Possibility of “Human Flourishing” in the Relationship Between Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics: A Multifocal Approach. In: Cohen de Lara, E., Brouwer, R. (eds) Aristotle’s Practical Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64825-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics