Advertisement

Learning Analytics Challenges to Overcome in Higher Education Institutions

  • Philipp LeitnerEmail author
  • Markus Ebner
  • Martin Ebner
Chapter

Abstract

While a large number of scientific publications explain the development of prototypes or the implementation of case studies in detail, descriptions of the challenges and proper solutions when implementing learning analytics initiatives are rare. In this chapter, we provide a practical tool that can be used to identify risks and challenges that arise when implementing learning analytics (LA) initiatives and discuss how to approach these to find acceptable solutions. In this way, implementers are given the opportunity to handle challenges early on and avoid being surprised at a critical moment in the project, which will save time, resources, and effort. We are aware that all aspects needed to successfully carry out learning analytics initiatives are co-dependent. Nonetheless, we identified and categorized the criteria necessary for implementing successful learning analytics initiatives. We conclude this chapter with an overview of the challenges faced and possible approaches that can be taken to facilitate the successful implementation of learning analytics.

Keywords

Learning analytics Implementation Challenge Higher education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research project is co-funded by the European Commission Erasmus+ program, in the context of the project 562167EPP-1-2015-1-BE-EPPKA3- PI-FORWARD. Please visit our website http://stelaproject.eu.

References

  1. Berg, A. M., Mol, S. T., Kismihók, G., & Sclater, N. (2016). The role of a reference synthetic data generator within the field of learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, J. P. (2007). Utilizing student data within the course management system to determine undergraduate student academic success: An exploratory study. PhD, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
  3. Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cormack, A. N. (2016). A data protection framework for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Laet, T., Broos, T., Verbert, K., van Staalduinen, J.-P., Ebner, M. & Leitner, P. (2018). Involving stakeholders in learning analytics: Opportunity or threat for learning analytics at scale? In Proceedings 8th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 602–606). Sydney.Google Scholar
  6. Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics - it’s a DELICATE issue: A checklist to establish trusted learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 89–96).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883893
  7. Duval, E. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining, In Erik Duval’s weblog, 30 January 2012. Retrieved from https://erikduval.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/learning-analytics-and-educational-data-mining/. Accessed 16 March 2018.
  8. Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning (IJTEL), 4(5/6), 304–317.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson, R., Hoel, T., Scheffel, M., & Drachsler, H. (2016). Guest editorial: Ethics and privacy in learning analytics. Journal of learning analytics, 3(1), 5–15.  https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoel, T., & Chen, W. (2016). Privacy-driven design of learning analytics applications - exploring the design space of solutions for data sharing and interoperability. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2012). The NMC horizon report: 2012 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  13. Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2015). Learning analytics: principles and constraints. In Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 1326–1336).Google Scholar
  14. Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2016). De-identification in learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laan, S. (2011). IT infrastructure architecture: Infrastructure building blocks and concepts. Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lang, C., Macfadyen, L. P., Slade, S., Prinsloo, P., & Sclater, N. (2018, March). The complexities of developing a personal code of ethics for learning analytics practitioners: Implications for institutions and the field. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 436–440). ACM.Google Scholar
  17. Leitner, P., Broos, T., & Ebner, M. (2018). Lessons learned when transferring learning analytics interventions across institutions. In Companion proceedings 8th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 621–629). Sydney.Google Scholar
  18. Leitner, P., & Ebner, M. (2017). In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. Technology in Education: 4th international conference, LCT 2017, held as part of HCI international 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, proceedings, part II (pp. 293–301). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leitner, P., Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education - a literature review. In Learning analytics: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 1–23). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Long, P. & Siemens, G., (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/9/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education. Accessed 16 March 2018.
  21. Macfadyen, L. P., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Gasevic, D. (2014). Embracing big data in complex educational systems: The learning analytics imperative and the policy challenge. Research & Practice in Assessment, 9, 17–28.Google Scholar
  22. Murray, P. M. (1990). The history of informed consent. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, 10, 104–109.Google Scholar
  23. Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2015). Student privacy self-management: Implications for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 83–92). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  24. Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2016). Student vulnerability, agency and learning analytics: An exploration. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., & Villagrá-Sobrino, S. (2016). Learning analytics in small-scale teacher-led innovations: Ethical and data privacy issues. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.Google Scholar
  27. Sclater, N. (2016). Developing a code of practice for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siemens, G., Gasevic, D., Haythornthwaite, C., Dawson, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Ferguson, R., … Baker, R. S. J. D. (2011). Open learning analytics: An integrated & modularized platform. Proposal to design, implement and evaluate an open platform to integrate heterogeneous learning analytics techniques. Society for Learning Analytics Research.Google Scholar
  29. Steiner, C. M., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2016). LEA in private: A privacy and data protection framework for a learning analytics toolbox. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 66–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsai, Y. S., & Gasevic, D. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education---challenges and policies: A review of eight learning analytics policies. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 233–242). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations