Capacity Building in Rural Communities Through Community-Based Collaborative Partnerships

  • Kathy Sheppard-Jones
  • Elizabeth Hunter
  • Walter Bower
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to identify capacity building strategies with entities existing in rural communities to better serve persons with disabilities. Established partners such as the Cooperative Extension System, community leaders, and faith-based institutions are considered as viable and practical collaborators. In addition, this chapter will address both real and perceived barriers to collaboration. The roles of rehabilitation counselors and administrators will be used to suggest ways to circumvent barriers to collaboration.

Keywords

Collaboration Capacity building Interagency collaboration Community partnerships 

References

  1. Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1667–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification. (2017). Code of professional ethics for rehabilitation counselors. Schaumburg, IL: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Graham, J. R. & Barter, K. (1999). Collaboration: A social work practice method. Families in society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80, 6–13.Google Scholar
  4. Haire, B. (2007). AgrAbility to aid disabled farmers. Southeast Farm Press, 34, 23.Google Scholar
  5. History of AgrAbility. (2016, July 14). Retrieved from: http://www.agrability.org/about/program/
  6. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve, public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuipers, P., Kendall, E., & Hancock, T. (2001). Developing a rural community-based disability service: Service framework and implementation strategy. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 9, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lustig, D. C., Weems, G. H., & Strauser, D. R. (2004). Rehabilitation service patterns: A rural/urban comparison of success factors. Journal of Rehabilitation, 70, 13–19.Google Scholar
  9. Mathew, S. N., Field, W. E., & Etheridge, S. (2011). Assessing the relationship between AgrAbility projects and state vocational rehabilitation services. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 93–105.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, R. H., & Fetsch, R. J. (2006). National AgrAbility project impact on farmers and ranchers with disabilities. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, 12, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Minkler, M., Blackwell, A. G., Thompson, M., & Tamir, H. (2003). Community based participatory research: Implications for public health funding. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1210–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Brien, J. (1992) Developing high quality services for people with developmental disabilities. In: Bradley, V.J., Bersani, H.A. (Eds). Quality Assurance for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities. Paul Brookes, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  13. Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2003). The conceptual historical and practice roots of community based participatory research and related participatory traditions. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community based participatory research for health (pp. 27–52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Walter, U. M., & Petr, C. G. (2000). A template for family-centered interagency collaboration. Families in Society, 81, 494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathy Sheppard-Jones
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Hunter
    • 2
  • Walter Bower
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Kentucky, Human Development InstituteLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Graduate Center for GerontologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations