Advertisement

Conflict Management in Leader Development: The Roles of Control, Trust, and Fairness

  • Chris P. LongEmail author
Chapter
  • 917 Downloads
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 15)

Abstract

This chapter contributes to research on leader development by evaluating how managers can effectively address leader-employee conflicts (goal, task, personal) by applying specific forms of organizational controls (input, behavior, output), by building particular forms of trust (demonstrating their ability, benevolence, and integrity) and by promoting distinct forms of fairness (distributive, procedural, interactional). By examining how leaders can preserve, protect, and promote their legitimacy and authority through multifaceted conflict management strategies, the ideas described in this chapter are presented in an effort to move leadership research past its current focus on singular types of control, trust-building, and fairness-promotion actions to examine how complementary forms of these activities can jointly motivate employee cooperation. The discussion at the end of the chapter examines how the principles outlined in this theory can be integrated into leadership development initiatives.

Keywords

Control Trust Fairness Conflict management Leader Development Cooperation Organizational behavior 

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity of social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 276–299). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Arvey, R. D. (1979). Fairness in selecting employees. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, L., & Kram, K. (1983). Career dynamics: Managing the leader/employee relationship. Organizational Dynamics, 11, 46–64.Google Scholar
  5. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 25–26.Google Scholar
  7. Baron, R. A. (1997). Positive effects of conflict: Insights from social cognition. In C. K. W. de Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflicts in organizations (pp. 177–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. (1996). Organizational economics: Understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 115–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). The development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538–1567.Google Scholar
  11. Bendersky, C. (2003). Organizational dispute resolution systems: A complementarities perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 643–656.Google Scholar
  12. Bies, R. (1989). Managing conflict before it happens: The role of accounts. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 83–92). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations (pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  14. Blau, P., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Boyle, E. H., & Lawler, E. J. (1991). Resolving conflict through explicit bargaining. Social Forces, 69, 1183–1204.Google Scholar
  16. Bromiley, P., & Cummings, L. L. (1995). Transactions costs in organizations with trust. In R. Bies, B. Sheppard, & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 219–247). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  18. Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., & Long, C. P. (2004). Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15, 411–431.Google Scholar
  19. Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., & Long, C. P. (2010). A configurational theory of control. In S. B. Sitkin, L. B. Cardinal, & K. Bijlsma-Frankema (Eds.), Organizational control (pp. 51–79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Chen, Y.-R., & Church, A. H. (1993). Reward allocation preferences in groups and organizations. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 25–59.Google Scholar
  21. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.Google Scholar
  22. Day, D. (2001). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 581–613.Google Scholar
  23. Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 63–82.Google Scholar
  24. Deutsch, M. (1975). Justice in the “crunch”. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 369–381.Google Scholar
  26. Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 601–620.Google Scholar
  27. Dornbusch, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 31, 57–74.Google Scholar
  29. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois, J. L. (1988). Politics of strategic decision-making in high velocity environments: Toward a mid-range theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737–770.Google Scholar
  30. Enzle, M. E., & Anderson, S. C. (1993). Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 257–266.Google Scholar
  31. Fayol, H. (1919). General and industrial management. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  32. Folger, R., Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 129–177.Google Scholar
  33. Frank, R. H. (1988). Passions with reason: The strategic role of emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  34. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1–7.Google Scholar
  35. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 1, 13–47.Google Scholar
  36. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.Google Scholar
  37. Greenberg, J. (1990). Look fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 111–157). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  38. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). An interdependence-conflict model of team decision making. Journal of Management, 25, 117–142.Google Scholar
  39. Jaworski, B. (1988). Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 52, 23–39.Google Scholar
  40. Jehn, K. A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 3, 223–228.Google Scholar
  41. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.Google Scholar
  42. Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. K. W. de Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflicts in organizations (pp. 87–100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Jermier, J. M. (1998). Introduction: Critical theory perspectives on control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 235–256.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.Google Scholar
  45. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Making global strategies work. Sloan Management Review, 34, 11–27.Google Scholar
  46. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.Google Scholar
  47. Kirsch, L. J. (1996). The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organization Science, 7, 1–21.Google Scholar
  48. Lawler, E. E., Ford, R., & Large, M. D. (1999). Unilateral initiatives as a conflict resolution strategy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 240–256.Google Scholar
  49. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.Google Scholar
  50. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 91–131). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  52. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167–218). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Levinthal, D. (1988). A survey of agency models of organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 9, 153–185.Google Scholar
  54. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  55. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952–959.Google Scholar
  56. Long, C. P., Burton, R. M., & Cardinal, L. B. (2002). Three controls are better than one: A computational model of complex control systems. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 8, 197–220.Google Scholar
  57. Long, C. P. (2010). Control to cooperation: Examining the role of managerial authority in portfolios of managerial actions. In S. B. Sitkin, L. B. Cardinal, & K. Bijlsma-Frankema (Eds.), Organizational control. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Long, C. P., Bendersky, C., & Morrill, C. (2011). Fairness monitoring: Linking managerial controls and fairness judgments in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1045–1068.Google Scholar
  59. Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. (2006). Trust in the balance: How managers integrate trust-building and task control. In R. Bachmann & A. Zaheer (Eds.), Handbook of trust research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Long, C. P., Sitkin, S. B., & Cardinal, L. B. (2014). Managerial action to promote control, trust and fairness in organizations: The effect of conflict. In J. A. Miles (Ed.), New directions in management and organization theory. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. Long, C. P. (2016a). Mapping the main roads to fairness: Examining the managerial context of fairness-promotion. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 757–783.Google Scholar
  62. Long, C. P. (2016b). Promoting fairness in the face of conflict: The moderating effect of social control. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37, 593–608.Google Scholar
  63. Lowenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, G. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 586–597.Google Scholar
  64. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.Google Scholar
  65. Mayo, E. (1945). The social problems of an industrial civilization. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  66. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organization. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.Google Scholar
  67. Mendl, J. R. (1989). Managing to be fair: An exploration of values, motives and leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 252–276.Google Scholar
  68. Merchant, K. A. (1985). Control in business organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  69. Molm, L. D. (1984). The disruption and recovery of dyadic social interaction. In E. E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 183–227). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  70. Molm, L. D. (1987). Linking power structure and power use. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Social exchange theory (pp. 101–109). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  71. Molm, L. D. (1990). Structure, action and outcomes: The dynamics of power in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 55, 427–447.Google Scholar
  72. Molm, L. D. (1991). Affect and social exchange: Satisfaction in power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 56, 475–493.Google Scholar
  73. Ouchi, W. G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 95–113.Google Scholar
  74. Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833–848.Google Scholar
  75. Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.Google Scholar
  76. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations, a critical essay (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  77. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  78. Popper, M. (2005). Main principles and practices in leader development. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26, 62–75.Google Scholar
  79. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.Google Scholar
  80. Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B., & Novak, M. A. (1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 579–584.Google Scholar
  81. Schriesheim, C. A., Neider, L. L., & Scandura, T. A. (1998). A within-and between-groups analysis of leader-member exchange as a correlate of delegation and as a moderator of delegation relationships with performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298–318.Google Scholar
  82. Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Layne Paddock, E. (2009). An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: The role of managerial motives and discretion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 756–769.Google Scholar
  83. Shapiro, D., Sheppard, B. H., & Cheraskin, L. (1992). Business in a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8, 365–377.Google Scholar
  84. Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161–176.Google Scholar
  85. Sheppard, B. H., & Sherman, D. M. (1998). The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23, 422–437.Google Scholar
  86. Sitkin, S. B. (1995). On the positive effect of legalization on trust. In R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (pp. 185–217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  87. Sitkin, S. B., & Bies, R. J. (1993). Social accounts in conflict situations: Using explanations to manage conflict. Human Relations, 46, 349–370.Google Scholar
  88. Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367–392.Google Scholar
  89. Sitkin, S. B., & Stickel, D. (1996). The road to hell: The dynamics of distrust in an era of quality. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations. Frontiers in theory and research (pp. 196–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  90. Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 292–327.Google Scholar
  91. Spreitzer, G. M., & Mishra, A. K. (1999). Giving up control without losing control: Trust and its substitutes’ effects on managers’ involving employees in decision making. Group and Organization Management, 24, 155–187.Google Scholar
  92. Suchman, M. A. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
  93. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975).P rocedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  94. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541–566.Google Scholar
  95. Thompson, L., Gentner, D., & Lowenstein, J. (2000). Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 60–75.Google Scholar
  96. Tjsvold, D. (1989). Interdependence approach to conflict Management in Organizations. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 41–50). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  97. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 151–191). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  98. Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. W. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 209–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  99. Wanous, J. P. (1980). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection and socialization of newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  100. Weber, M. (1918). Economy and society (1968 trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  101. Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530.Google Scholar
  102. Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L., & Jones, T. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24, 99–116.Google Scholar
  103. Wilkins, A. L., & Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient cultures: Exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 468–481.Google Scholar
  104. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  105. Yukl, G., Falbe, C. M., & Youn, J. Y. (1993). Patterns of influence behavior for managers. Group & Organization Management, 18, 5–28.Google Scholar
  106. Yukl, G., Guinan, P. J., & Sottolano, D. (1995). Influence tactics used for different objectives with employees, peers, and leaders. Group and Organization Management, 20, 272–296.Google Scholar
  107. Zelditch, M., Jr., & Walker, H. A. (1984). Legitimacy and the stability of authority. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, 1, 1–25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tobin College of Business, St. John’s UniversityQueensUSA

Personalised recommendations