Advertisement

Dark Leadership: The Role of Leaders’ Dark Triad Personality Traits

  • Marco R. FurtnerEmail author
  • Thomas Maran
  • John F. Rauthmann
Chapter
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 15)

Abstract

For a long time, leadership research has focused too much on idealized, romantic, and “good” forms of leadership (e.g., transformational, empowering, authentic, and ethical leadership), but neglected the antagonistic part: the dark side of leadership. Current personality and leadership literature suggests that, due to their high need for power and social dominance orientation, a variety of dark triad personalities (narcissists, Machiavellians, and psychopaths) can be found in leadership positions. Accordingly, dark leadership reflects a part of leadership reality. Nevertheless, the dark side of leadership is still relatively understudied. This chapter combines dark triad personality with dark leadership research to describe narcissistic, Machiavellian, and psychopathic leadership. Additionally, the role of the dark triad in leader development is described. Dark leaders may be selfish, impulsive, exploitative, and toxic but still be as effective or successful as prosocial, self-controlled, and “good” leaders. The focus on leaders’ dark traits and leadership could improve our understanding of the complex, dynamic, and challenging field of leadership research. Thus, knowledge on the strengths and weaknesses of the dark triad can be utilized in leader development.

Keywords

Personality Leader Development Dark triad Narcissism Machiavellian Psychopathy 

References

  1. Altemeyer, B. (2004). Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 421–447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avolio, B. J. (2004). Examining the full range model of leadership: Looking back to transform forward. In D. V. Day, S. J. Zaccaro, & S. M. Halpin (Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations: Grow leaders for tomorrow (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits when psychopaths go to work. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  6. Babiak, P., Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2010). Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 174–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  9. Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baughman, H. M., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. A. (2012). Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bedell, K., Hunter, S., Angie, A., & Vert, A. (2006). A historiometric examination of Machiavellianism and a new taxonomy of leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 12, 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Belschak, F. D., Den Hartog, D. N., & Kalshoven, K. (2015). Leading Machiavellians: How to translate Machiavellians’ selfishness into pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 1934–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Belsky, J., Schlomer, G. L., & Ellis, B. J. (2012). Beyond cumulative risk: Distinguishing harshness and unpredictability as determinants of parenting and early life history strategy. Developmental Psychology, 48, 662–673.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boddy, C. R. (2015a). Organisational psychopaths: A ten year update. Management Decision, 53, 2407–2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boddy, C. R. (2015b). Psychopathic leadership: A case study of a corporate psychopath CEO. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2908-6
  18. Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H., & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Book, A. S., Quinsey, V. L., & Langford, D. (2007). Psychopathy and the perception of affect and vulnerability. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Book, A., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2015). Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown, M. E., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Ethical and unethical leadership: Exploring new avenues for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brumbach, B. H., Figueredo, A. J., & Ellis, B. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on development of life history strategies: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Human Nature, 20, 25–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cain, N. M., Pincus, A. L., & Ansell, E. B. (2008). Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 638–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Calhoon, R. P. (1969). Niccolo Machiavelli and the twentieth century administrator. The Academy of Management Journal, 12, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chan, K. Y., & Drasgow, F. (2001). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 481–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chiaburu, D. S., Munoz, G. J., & Gardner, R. G. (2013). How to spot a careerist early on: Psychopathy and exchange ideology as predictors of careerism. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby.Google Scholar
  29. Cohen, A. (2016). Are they among us? A conceptual framework of the relationship between the Dark Triad personality and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Human Resource Management Review, 26, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 65–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Conger, J. (1990). The dark side of leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Del Giudice, M. (2014). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Del Giudice, M., Gangestad, S. W., & Kaplan, H. S. (2015). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology—Vol 1: Foundations (2nd ed., pp. 88–114). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Deluga, R. J. (1997). Relationship among American presidential charismatic leadership, narcissism, and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dongwillo, E. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2017). Differentiating Dark Triad traits within and across interpersonal circumplex surfaces. Assessment, 24, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Douglas, H., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2012). Distinguishing the Dark Triad: Evidence from the five-factor model and the Hogan development survey. Psychology, 3, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Drory, A., & Gluskinos, U. M. (1980). Machiavellianism and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ellis, B. J., & Del Giudice, M. (2014). Beyond allostatic load: Rethinking the role of stress in regulating human development. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Furtner, M. R., & Baldegger, U. (2016). Self-Leadership und Führung: Theorien, Modelle und praktische Umsetzung (2. Auflage) [Self-leadership and leadership: Theories, models, and practical application (2 nd edition)]. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  46. Furtner, M. R., Baldegger, U., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2013). Leading yourself and leading others: Linking self-leadership to transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 436–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Furtner, M. R., Rauthmann, J. F., & Sachse, P. (2011). The self-loving self-leader: An examination of the relationship between self-leadership and the Dark Triad. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Glenn, A. L., Kurzban, R., & Raine, A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grijalva, E., & Harms, P. D. (2014). Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementarity model. Academy of Management: Perspectives, 28, 108–127.Google Scholar
  50. Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H., & Fraley, C. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist—Revised. Toronto, Canada: MHS.Google Scholar
  52. Harms, P. D., & Spain, S. M. (2015). Beyond the bright side: Dark personalities at work. Applied Psychology, 64, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hawley, P. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescent: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Journal of Development Psychology, 49, 279–309.Google Scholar
  55. Higgs, M. (2009). The good, the bad and the ugly: Leadership and narcissism. Journal of Change Management, 9, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Johnson, S. L., Leedom, L. J., & Muhtadie, L. (2012). The dominance behavioral system and psychopathology: Evidence from self-report, observational, and biological studies. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 692–743.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Johnson, R. E., Venus, M., Lanaj, K., Mao, C., & Chang, C.-H. (2012). Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1262–1272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jonason, P. K., & Ferrell, J. D. (2016). Looking under the hood: The psychogenic motivational foundations of the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The Dark Triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.Google Scholar
  61. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., Bethell, E. J., & Ross, R. (2013). Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 449–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., & Li, N. P. (2015). Competition, autonomy, and prestige: Mechanisms through which the Dark Triad predict job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jonason, P. K., Wee, S., Li, N. P., & Jackson, C. (2014). Occupational niches and the Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jones, D. N. (2014). Risk in the face of retribution: Psychopathic individuals persist in financial misbehavior among the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the Dark Triad. European Journal of Personality, 27, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 102–120). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  69. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011a). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–269). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011b). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kajonius, P. J., Persson, B. N., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Hedonism, achievement, and power: Universal values that characterize the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  74. Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., & Penney, L. M. (2010). Re-examining Machiavelli: A three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1868–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Kiewitz, C., & Tang, R. L. (2010). In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39, 1308–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). The two pathways to being an (un-)popular narcissist. Journal of Personality, 81, 184–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Leckelt, M., Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015). Behavioral processes underling the decline of narcissists’ popularity over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 856–871.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lucke, G. A., & Furtner, M. R. (2015). Soldiers lead themselves to more success: a self-leadership intervention study. Military Psychology, 27, 311–324.Google Scholar
  81. Maccoby, M. (2000). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review, 78, 68–77.Google Scholar
  82. Maccoby, M. (2003). The productive narcissist: The promise and peril of visionary leadership. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  83. Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016). Dark side of impulsivity—Associations between the Dark Triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Mann, R. D. (1959). A review of the relationships between personality and performance in small group. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mathieu, C., & Babiak, P. (2015). Tell me who you are, I’ll tell you how you lead: Beyond the full-range leadership model, the role of corporate psychopathy on employee attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mathieu, C., & Babiak, P. (2016). Corporate psychopathy and abusive subversion: Their influence on employees’ job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mathieu, C., Neumann, C., Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2015). Corporate psychopathy and the full-range leadership model. Assessment, 22, 267–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mathieu, C., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  90. McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  91. McDonald, M. M., Donnellan, M. B., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). A life history approach to understanding the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 601–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. McIlwain, D., Evans, J., Caldis, E., Cicchini, F., Aronstan, A., Wright, A., & Taylor, A. (2012). Strange moralities: Vicarious emotion and moral emotions in Machiavellian and Psychopathic personality styles. In R. Langdon & C. Mackenzie (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 119–148). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  93. Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nagler, U. K. J., Reiter, K. J., Furtner, M. R., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2014). Is there a “dark intelligence”? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nevicka, B., Ten Velden, F. S., De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2011). Reality at odds with perceptions: Narcissistic leaders and group performance. Psychological Science, 22, 1259–1264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ong, C. W., Roberts, R., Arthur, C. A., Woodman, T., & Akehurst, S. (2016). The leader ship is sinking: A temporal investigation of narcissistic leadership. Journal of Personality, 84, 237–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  99. Ouimet, G. (2010). Dynamics of narcissistic leadership in organizations: Towards an integrated research model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 713–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Pailing, A., Boon, J., & Egan, V. (2014). Personality, the Dark Triad and violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197–1208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Paunonen, S. V., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Leikas, S., & Nissinen, V. (2006). Narcissism and emergent leadership in military cadets. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pelletier, K. L. (2010). Leader toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric. Leadership, 6, 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). The Dark Triad and interpersonal perception: Similarities and differences in the social consequences of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2012). How “dark” are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 884–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2013). Positioning the Dark Triad in the interpersonal circumplex: The friendly-dominant narcissism, hostile-submissive Machiavellian, and hostile-dominant psychopath? Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 622–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Reichard, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (2011). Leader self-development as organizational strategy. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Roeser, K., McGregor, V. E., Stegmaier, S., Mathew, J., Kübler, A., & Meule, A. (2016). The Dark Triad of personality and unethical behavior at different times of day. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rushton, J. P. (1985). Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Simonton, D. K. (1986). Presidential personality: Biographical use of the Gough Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., & McBride, M. V. (2007). Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 67–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Spain, S. M., Harms, P., & Lebreton, J. M. (2013). The dark side of personality at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Spencer, R. J., & Byrne, M. K. (2016). Relationship between the extent of psychopathic features among corporate managers and subsequent employee job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Spurk, D., Keller, A. C., & Hirschi, A. (2016). Do bad guys get ahead or fall behind? Relationships of the Dark Triad of personality with objective and subjective career success. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Stearns, S. C. (1992). The evolution of life histories. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  121. Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Martin, R. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). Relations between humor styles and the Dark Triad traits of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 772–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Volmer, J., Koch, I. K., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). The bright and the dark side of leaders’ Dark Triad traits: Effects on subordinates’ career success and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the Dark Triad personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 794–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Westerlaken, K. M., & Woods, P. R. (2013). The relationship between psychopathy and the full range leadership model. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Williams, K. M., Paulhus, D. L., & Hare, R. D. (2007). Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 205–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Winter, D. G. (2005). Things I’ve learned about personality from studying political leaders at a distance. Journal of Personality, 73, 557–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Zand, D. E. (1997). The leadership triad: Knowledge, trust, and power. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco R. Furtner
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Thomas Maran
    • 1
    • 3
  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Leopold-Franzens University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.University of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein
  3. 3.Alps Adria University of KlagenfurtKlagenfurt am WörtherseeAustria
  4. 4.Humboldt-University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  5. 5.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations