Abstract
How do surgeons react to error or patient complications? What factors affect these reactions and how do these reactions affect future performance? This chapter will shed light on recent work that explored surgeons’ reactions to adverse events. Several psychological theories are proposed, and ways they might help toward a greater understanding of the surgeon in the midst of an adverse event are suggested. While psychological theories help explain the inner workings of our brain and subsequent emotional reactions as human beings to these events, surgeons are also embedded in a very powerful culture that influences our interpretation and experience of events. Therefore, we will also interrogate the surgical culture and accuse it somewhat of being at the epicenter of these reactions. Recognizing that it is impossible to “do no harm” over the course of a surgical career, we will provide a language to conceptualize, understand, and teach the experience of adverse events in surgery in a new way. We argue that, by reducing the stigma around admitting error and instead framing the unavoidable experience of adverse events as an opportunity for growth and reflection, surgeons and learners may open new avenues in which to harness surgical expertise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tyson, Peter. “The Hippocratic Oath Today” PBS.org. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/hippocratic-oathtoday.html 03/27/01. Accessed February 10, 2017.
Kohn L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2000.
American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, Code of medical ethics: current opinions with annotations, Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, School of Law; 2002–2003 ed.
Shiloach M, Frencher SJ, Steeger J, Rowell K, Bartzokis K, Tomeh M, Richards K, Ko C, Hall B. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16.
Hamilton B, Ko C, Richards K, Hall B. Missing data in the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:125–39.e2.
Dhillon B. Human errors: a review. Microelectron Reliab. 1989;29:299–304.
Wiegmann D, Shappell S. Human error perspectives in aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol. 2001;11:341–57.
Brennan T, Leape L, Laird N, Hebert L, Localio R, Lawthers A, Newhouse JWP, Hiatt H. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard medical practice study. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.
Leape L. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851–7.
Hofer T, Kerr E, Hayward R. What is an error? Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:261–9.
Shojania K, Wald H, Gross R. Understanding medical error and improving patient safety in the inpatient setting. Med Clin North Am. 2002;86:847–67.
Paget M. The unity of mistakes: a phenomenological interpretation of medical work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1988.
Luu S, Patel P, St-Martin L, Leung A, Regehr G, Murnaghan M, Gallinger S, Moulton C. Waking up the next morning: surgeons’ emotional reactions to adverse events. Med Educ. 2012;46:1179–88.
Hilfiker D. Facing our mistakes. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:118–22.
Levinson W, Dunn P. A piece of my mind. Coping with fallibility. JAMA. 1989;261:2252.
Hilfiker D. Healing the wounds: a physician looks at his work. 1st ed. New York: Pantheon; 1985.
Wu A. Medical error: the second victim. BMJ. 2000;320:726.
Scott S, Hirschinger L, Cox K, McCoig M, Brandt J, Hall L. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider “second victim” after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:325–30.
Patel A, Ingalls N, Mansour M, Sherman S, Davis A, Chung M. Collateral damage: the effect of patient complications on the surgeon’s psyche. Surgery. 2010;148:824–828.; discussion 8–30.
American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5, DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Christensen J, Levinson W, Dunn P. The heart of darkness: the impact of perceived mistakes on physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:424–31.
Newman M. The emotional impact of mistakes on family physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1996;5:71–5.
O’Beirne M, Sterling P, Palacios-Derflingher L, Hohman S, Zwicker K. Emotional impact of patient safety incidents on family physicians and their office staff. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25:177–83.
Pinto A, Faiz O, Bicknell C, Vincent C. Surgical complications and their implications for surgeons’ well-being. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1748–55.
Schelbred A, Nord R. Nurses’ experiences of drug administration errors. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60:317–24.
Waterman A, Garbutt J, Hazel E, Dunagan W, Levinson W, Fraser V, Gallagher T. The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:467–76.
Gallagher T, Mello M, Levinson W, Wynia M, Sachdeva A, Snyder Sulmasy L, RD T, Conway J, Mazor K, Lembitz A, Bell S, Sokol-Hessner L. Talking with patients about other clinicians’ errors. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1752–7.
Pinto A, Faiz O, Bicknell C, Vincent C. Acute traumatic stress among surgeons after major surgical complications. Am J Surg. 2014;208:642–7.
Shanafelt T, Balch C, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, Collicott P, Novotny P, Sloan J, Freischlag J. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010;251:995–1000.
West C, Huschka M, Novotny P, Sloan J, Kolars J, Habermann T, Shanafelt T. Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA. 2006;296:1071–8.
Fahrenkopf A, Sectish T, Barger L, Sharek P, Lewin D, Chiang V, Edwards S, Wiedermann B, Landrigan CP. Rates of medication errors among depressed and burnt out residents: prospective cohort study. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2008;336:488–91.
Blendon R, DesRoches C, Brodie M, Benson J, Rosen A, Schneider E, Altman D, Zapert K, Herrmann M, Steffenson A. Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1933–40.
Firth-Cozens J, Greenhalgh J. Doctors’ perceptions of the links between stress and lowered clinical care. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:1017–22.
Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston: Row; 1957.
Steele C. The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self. In: Leonard B, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 21. San Diego: Academic; 1988. p. 261–302.
Sherman D, Cohen G. The psychology of self-defense: self-affirmation theory. In: Mark PZ, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego: Academic; 2006. p. 183–242.
Aronson J, Blanton H, Cooper J. From dissonance to disidentification: selectivity in the self-affirmation process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;68:986–96.
Blanton H, Cooper J, Slkurnik I, Aronson J. When bad things happen to good feedback: exacerbating the need for self-justification with self-affirmations. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1997;23:684–92.
Sherman D, Cohen G. Accepting threatening information: self affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2002;11:119–23.
Kahneman D, Miller D. Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychol Rev. 1986;93:136–53.
Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
Markman K, McMullen M. A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7:244–67.
Mandel D. Counterfactuals, emotions, and context. Cognit Emot. 2003;17:139–59.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
Kübler-Ross E. On death and dying. London/New York: Routledge; 1973.
Rowe M. Doctors’ responses to medical errors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004;52:147–63.
Morris M, Moore P. The lessons we (don’t) learn: counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Adm Sci Q. 2000;45:737–65.
Tetlock P, Skitka L, Boettger R. Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity and bolstering. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(4):632–40.
Hendee W. Accountability in the acquisition and use of medical technologies. Int J Technol Manag. 1995;10:38–47.
Coombs R, Fawzy F, Daniels M. Surgeons’ personalities: the influence of medical school. Med Educ. 1993;27:337–43.
May T, Aulisio M. Medical malpractice, mistake prevention, and compensation. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001;11:135–46.
Shotter J, Gergen K. Social construction: knowledge, self, others and continuing the conversation. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 1994;17(1):3–33.
Katz P. The Scalpel’s edge: the culture of surgeons. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
Pratt M, Rockmann K, Kauffmann J. Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manag. 2006;49:235–62.
Cassell J. Expected miracles: surgeons at work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1991.
Sargeant J, Bruce D, Campbell C. Practicing physicians’ needs for assessment and feedback as part of professional development. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S54–62.
Greenberg C, Ghousseini H, Pavuluri Quamme S, Beasley H, Wiegmann D. Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement. Ann Surg. 2014;261(1):32–4.
Schwellnus H, Carnahan H. Peer-coaching with health care professionals: what is the current status of the literature and what are the key components necessary in peer-coaching? A scoping review. Med Teach. 2014;36(1):38–46.
Hu Y, Peyre S, Arriaga A, Osteen R, Corso K, Weiser T, Swanson R, Ashley S, Raut C, Zinner M, Gawande A, Greenberg C. Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):115–24.
Mutabdzic D, Mylopoulos M, Murnaghan M, Patel P, Zilbert N, Seemann N, Regehr G, Moulton C. Coaching surgeons: is culture limiting our ability to improve? Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):213–6.
Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten C, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Music lessons: revealing medicine’s learning culture through a comparison with that of music. Med Educ. 2013;47(8):842–50.
Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Sargeant J. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 2011;86(9):1120–7.
Aasland O, Forde R. Impact of feeling responsible for adverse events on doctors’ personal and professional lives: the importance of being open to criticism from colleagues. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:13–7.
Engel K, Rosenthal M, Sutcliffe K. Residents’ responses to medical error: coping, learning, and change. Acad Med. 2006;81:86–93.
Berlinger N, Wu A. Subtracting insult from injury: addressing cultural expectations in the disclosure of medical error. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:106–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mobilio, M.H., Moulton, Ca. (2018). Surgeons’ Reactions to Error. In: Köhler, T., Schwartz, B. (eds) Surgeons as Educators . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64728-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64728-9_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64727-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64728-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)