Skip to main content

The “Little Town-Halls” in the Czech Republic: An Unexploited Potential of Functional Decentralization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to analyze the function of sub-municipal units (SMUs) and to identify the drivers or initiators of the creation of SMUs and the role SMUs play in terms of representative democracy and multilevel governance in the Czech Republic. The study addresses the following issues: How often do Czech statutory cities decide to organize sub-municipal councils? What is the role of the SMUs in the provision of local government functions? What is the level of citizens’ interest in the SMUs? The chapter concludes with a discussion on whether the SMUs could be the appropriate instrument, partially counterbalancing the negative effects of the Czech fragmented municipal structure.

Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: jakub.lysek@upol.cz (J. Lysek). Department of Political Science and European Studies, Palacký University, Křížkovského 12, Olomouc 771 80, Czech Republic. IGA_FF_2016_15.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Document on Decentralization of the statutory city Prostějov, the proposal tabled to the city council on 15 February 2016. Available at http://mapy.mestopv.cz/soubory/materialy%20do%20zastupitelstva/2015/2.11.2015/.

  2. 2.

    E-mail communication with Kamil Rajsigl, the head of Organizational Department of the statutory city Brno, email: rajsigl.kamil@brno.cz.

  3. 3.

    E-mail conversation with Jiři Turek, the Head of Department of the Secretary, e-mail: Jiri.Turek@mmp.cz.

  4. 4.

    The Statute was amended”. The statutory city Opava, available at: http://www.opava-city.cz/cs/statut-mesta-opavy-prosel-upravami.

  5. 5.

    Abolishing SMUs is a nonsense, councillors say”, Aktualne.cz, available at: https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/domaci/politika/zrusit-obvody-ve-mestech-nesmysl-rikaji-starostove/r~i:article:515281/.

  6. 6.

    SMUs want to make decision about themselves”, Ostrava, available at: https://poruba.ostrava.cz/cs/o-porube/aktualne/obvody-chteji-rozhodovat-o-svem-rozvoji.

  7. 7.

    The referendum on abolishing SMUs”, IDNES, available at: http://pardubice.idnes.cz/referendum-mestske-obvody-zruseni-duc-/pardubice-zpravy.aspx?c=A130405_1913136_pardubice-zpravy_mt.

  8. 8.

    Document on Decentralization of the statutory city Prostějov, the proposal tabled to the city council on 15 February 2016. Available at http://mapy.mestopv.cz/soubory/materialy%20do%20zastupitelstva/2015/2.11.2015/.

  9. 9.

    Email communication with Kamil Rajsigl, the head of Organizational Department of the statutory city Brno. rajsigl.kamil@brno.cz.

  10. 10.

    All city budgets are available on the portal of Ministry of Finance: http://monitor.statnipokladna.cz/2016/.

  11. 11.

    Aggregated data file for the year 2016—monthly annual surveys from January to December 2016. Available in SPSS (English) or other formats at: http://nesstar.soc.cas.cz/webview/.

  12. 12.

    SmartCities Magazine 2016, http://www.scmagazine.cz/casopis/02-16/ceska-cesta-k-participativnimu-rozpoctovani?locale=cs.

  13. 13.

    Prague 3, http://hlasovani.praha3.cz/, Prague 10, http://moje-stopa.cz/.

  14. 14.

    Ostrava-South district, https://ovajih.ostrava.cz/cs/obcan/participativni-rozpocet.

  15. 15.

    SMUs will not be terminated in Usti”, Ustecky Deník, available at http://ustecky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/obvody-mesto-zatim-nezrusi-20130213.html.

References

  • Bäck, H., Gjelstrup, G., Helgesen, M., Johansson, F., & Erlig, J. K. (2005). Urban Political Decentralisation: Six Scandinavian Cities. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bačlija, I., & Brezovsek, M. (2006). City Quarter Communities: A new quality in Slovenian Local Democracy. In A. Rosenbaum & J. Nemec (Eds.), Democratic Governance in the Central and Eastern European Countries: Challenges and Responses for the XXI Century. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bačlija, I., & Haček, M. (2009). Political Perception of Urban Sub-Local Entities. A Comparison of Studies from Ljubljana and Swedish Cities. Khamasin: Journal of American University in Cairo, 3, 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B. (2002). Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, The Netherlands, Norway and United Kingdom. Government & Policy C: Environment and Planning, 20(6), 793–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. (2004). Obce, města, městské části: o místní veřejné správě a její dekoncentraci statutárními vyhláškami v územně členěných městech. 1. vyd. Praha: Lipri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A., McLean, I., Taylor, B., & Curtice, J. (1999). Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain. European Journal of Political Research, 35, 389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., & Hlepas, N. K. (2006). Typologies of Local Government Systems. In H. Bäck, H. Heinelt, & A. Magnier (Eds.), The European Mayor: Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy (pp. 21–42). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag for Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hledíková, Z., Janák, J., & Dobeš, J. (2005). Dějiny správy v českých zemích od počátků státůpo současnost. Praha: Lidové noviny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illner, M. (2003a). The Czech Republic 1990–2001: Successful Reform at the Municipal Level and a Difficult Birth of the Intermediary Government. In H. Baldersheim, M. Illner, & H. Wollman (Eds.), Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe (pp. 61–90). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Illner, M. (2003b). Thirteen Years of Reforming Sub-national Government in the Czech Republic. In N. Kersting & A. Vetter (Eds.), Reforming Local Government in Europe Closing the Gap between Democracy and Efficiency (pp. 261–282). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Illner, M. (2010). The Czech Republic: Local Government in the Years after the Reform. In F. Hendriks, A. Lidström, & J. Loughlin (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe (pp. 505–527). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N., Caulfield, J., Nickson, A., Olowu, D., & Wollmann, H. (2009). Local Governance Reform in Global Perspective. In Urban and Regional Research International. Wiesbaden: VS -Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N., & Vetter, A. (Eds.). (2003). Reforming Local Government in Europe Closing the Gap between Democracy and Efficiency. Wiesbaden: VS -Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostelecký, T., Patočková, V., & Illner, M. (2012). Problem Residential Neighbourhoods and Policies Aimed at Their Regeneration in the Post-socialist City: A Case Study of Prague. Czech Sociological Review, 48(1), 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacina, K., & Vajdová, Z. (2000). Local Government in the Czech Republic. In T. M. Horvath (Ed.), Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeda, T. (2009). Komunální volby klamou. Krátké zastavení nad problematickými aspekty volebního systému pro obecní zastupitelstva. Acta Politologica, 1(3), 332–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political Trust and Trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How Low Can you Go? Rationales and Challenges for Neighbourhood Governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 5–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysek, J. (2016). Tackling Bureaucracy Growth in Time of Crisis: The Case of Czech Statutory Cities. Lex Localis, 14(4), 783–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryšavý, D., & Bernard, J. (2013). Size and Local Democracy: The Case of Czech Municipal Representatives. Local Government Studies, 39(6), 833–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryšavý, D., & Šaradín, P. (2011). Zastupitelé českých měst a obcí v evropské perspektivě. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).

    Google Scholar 

  • Šaradín, P. (2008). Teorie voleb druhého řádu a možnosti jejich aplikace v České republice. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (2001). Neighborhood Self-Management: Experiments in Civil Society. New York: Springer US.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (2007). Direct Democracy in Practice. Prague: Institute for Social and Economic Analysis and Institute of Sociology AS CR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations. Designing Institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Štainer, M., Vrábliková, I., and P. Šaradín. (2011). Analýza výkonu agend přenesené působnosti v podmínkách statutárního města Pardubice. Municipal document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šťastná, L., and M. Gregor. (2011). Local Government Efficiency: Evidence from the Czech Municipalities (IES Working Paper IES FSV, 2011/14). Prague: Charles University in Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R., Kaiser, C., & Eythórsson, G. T. (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Amalgamation Reforms in Selected European Countries. In S. Kuhlmann & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis National Trajectories and International Comparisons (pp. 23–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). (2002). Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: LGI—Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (2010). If Territorial Fragmentation is a Problem, is Amalgamation a Solution? An East European Perspective. Local Government Studies, 36(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (2014). Intra-Municipal Units in Urban Political Systems in Poland: Vicious Roundabout of Marginalization or Dead-End Street? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 7(2), 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, A. F., & Rodrigues, M. (2015). The Economic and Political Impacts of Top-Down Territorial Reforms: The Case of Sub-City Governments. Local Government Studies, 41(6), 956–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Asche, D., & Dierickx, G. (2007). The Decentralization of City Governments and the Restoration of Political Trust. Local Government Studies, 33(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ostaaijen, J., Gianoli, A., & Coulson, A. (2012). The Added Value of Intra-Municipal Decentralization: Comparing Bologna, Rotterdam and Birmingham. In L. Schaap & H. Daemen (Eds.), Renewal in European Local Democracies (pp. 145–164). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Laws

  • Act no. 128/2000 Coll., On municipalities in other words, the municipal system.

    Google Scholar 

  • Act no. 250/2000 Coll., Act on the Local Self-government Budgets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Act no. 312/2002 Coll: On Local Government Officials.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lysek, J. (2018). The “Little Town-Halls” in the Czech Republic: An Unexploited Potential of Functional Decentralization. In: Hlepas, NK., Kersting, N., Kuhlmann, S., Swianiewicz, P., Teles, F. (eds) Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64725-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics