Advertisement

Towards “Smart Governance” Through a Multidisciplinary Approach to E-government Integration, Interoperability and Information Sharing: A Case of the LMIP Project in South Africa

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10428)

Abstract

The integration and interoperability of e-government systems, and information sharing is essential in transforming governments to “smart governments” that deliver services to enhance the socio- economic inclusion and the quality of life of its citizens. The aim of this doctoral study is to understand institutional barriers to e-government integration, interoperability and information sharing preventing governments from transforming to smart governments. The study is an interpretive case study, using South Africa as a unique case of a developing country which has adopted the “smart” agenda. Findings will contribute to theory through advancing knowledge in the new research area of smart government as well as contributing to practice through generating applicable knowledge on digital transformation in the public sector.

Keywords

Smart government Smart governance Integration Interoperability Institutional theory E-government 

References

  1. 1.
    Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11(3), 369–386 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks Collection, Book 3 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawes, S.S.: Interagency information sharing: expected benefits, manageable risks. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 15(3), 377–394 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R.: Towards a smart State? Inter-agency collaboration, information integration, and beyond. Inf. Polity 17(3, 4), 269–280 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R., Helbig, N., Ojo, A.: Being smart: emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(1), 11–18 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R., Zhang, J., Puron-Cid, G.: Conceptualizing smartness in government: an integrative and multi-dimensional view. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(3), 524–534 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hollands, R.G.: Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3), 303–320 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huddy, L., Sears, D., Levy, J. (eds.): Group identity and political cohesion in Oxford Handbook of political psychology. Oxford University Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jimenez, C.E., Solanas, A., Falcone, F.: E-government interoperability: linking open and smart government. Computer 47, 22–24 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luna-Reyes, L.F., Gil-García, J.R.: Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-government phenomena. Gov. Inf. Q. 28(3), 329–345 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manda, M.I., Backhouse, J.: Towards a “Smart Society” through a connected and smart citizenry in south africa: a review of the national broadband strategy and policy. In: Scholl, H.J., et al. (eds.) EGOVIS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9820, pp. 228–240. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marchington, M., Vincent, S.: Analysing the influence of institutional, organizational and interpersonal forces in shaping inter-organizational relations. J. Manage. Stud. 41(6), 1029–1056 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noor, K.B.M.: Case study: a strategic research methodology. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 5(11), 1602–1604 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 1–28 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pardo, T.A., Nam, T., Burke, G.B.: E-government interoperability interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 30(1), 7–23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., Hardy, C.: Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. J. Manage. Stud. 37(1), 23–43 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scholl, H.J., AlAwadhi, S.: Creating smart governance: the key to radical ICT overhaul at the city of Munich. Inf. Polity 21(1), 21–42 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scholl, H.J., Klischewski, R.: Government integration and interoperability: framing the research agenda. Int. J. Public Adm. 30(8), 889–920 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scholl, H.J., Kubicek, H., Cimander, R., Klischewski, R.: Process integration, information sharing, and system interoperation in government: a comparative case analysis. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 313–323 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scott, W.R.: Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    South Africa: LMIP launch Minister’s speech (2012). http://www.hsrc.ac.za/uploads/
  22. 22.
    South Africa: National development plan. www.gov.za/issues/key-issues
  23. 23.
    South Africa: National Integrated ICT policy discussion paper (2015). http://www.gov.za/documents/national-integrated-ict-policy-discussion-paper-comments-invited
  24. 24.
    Suchman, M.: Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(3), 571–610 (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Presidency: Report of the Presidential Review Commission on the Reform and Transformation of the Public Service in South Africa, Pretoria (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zheng, D., Chen, J., Huang, L., Zhang, C.: E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 221–234 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations