Advertisement

The Importance and Benefits of Incorporating Assertiveness Training While Designing Co-curricular Activities for Students

  • Hardeep Anant
Chapter

Abstract

In 1975, the US psychologist Robert P. Liberman introduced assertion or personal effectiveness training at community health centres. Assertiveness training (AT) involves structured learning that aims at behaviour modification of individuals within groups. The rationale for providing assertiveness training is based on two key assumptions: The first is that assertive behaviour is confident problem-solving behaviour, marked by open communication and feedback, as opposed to aggressive or passive behaviours, which are considered potentially pathological and less optimum for performance in competitive and stressful situations. The second is the belief that altering expression of emotion will lead to corresponding affective states (felt emotions) in the mind. This paper focuses on how recent advances in neuroscience lend credence to this second key assumption and builds a case for incorporating appropriate forms of assertiveness training while designing co-curricular activities for students at any level.

Keywords

Assertiveness training Interpersonal communication Self and identity Self-awareness Conflict resolution Interpersonal relationships Self-development Designing co-curricular activities Behaviour modification Student development Personality Personality development Assertiveness 

References

  1. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Anant, H. (2010). Interpersonal perceptions within organizations: An exploratory study. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 4(4), 34–47.Google Scholar
  3. Anant, H. (2015). A study of the impact of openness and trust on the quality of interpersonal relations within organizations. International Journal of Recent Advances in Organizational Behavior and Decision Sciences, 1(3). (ISSN 2311–3197).Google Scholar
  4. Attitude. (2005) Encyclopedia Britannica Inc. CDROM.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, T. T. (1992). Effects of alternative modelling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrick, M. R., et al. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behaviour Therapy. (2005). Encyclopedia Britannica CD Rom.Google Scholar
  8. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6 Reprinted, pp. 1–2). London: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 195–222). Durham: Duke.Google Scholar
  10. Converse, P. E., Clausen, A. R., & Miller, W. E. (1965). Electoral myth and reality: The 1964 election. American Political Science Review, 49, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooley, E. L., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (1984). Locus of control in male and female college students. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 117, 1.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, C. L., & Sutherland, V. J. (1987). Job stress, mental health, and accidents among offshore workers in the oil and gas extraction industries. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 29(2), 119–125.Google Scholar
  13. Demerouti, E., & Eeuwijk, E. V. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of “personal effectiveness” training on psychological capital, assertiveness and self-awareness using self-other agreement. Career development international. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 16(1), 60–81. doi: 10.1108/13620431111107810.Google Scholar
  14. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16(4), 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drabek, M., Merecez, D., & Moscicka, A. (2005). Trait anxiety and type behavior pattern (A and B) as modifiers of immediate reaction towards violent behaviors. Medycyna Pracy, 56, 223.Google Scholar
  17. Draganski, B., Kherif, F., & Lutti, A. (2014, June). Computational anatomy for studying use dependent brain plasticity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018716
  18. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Flynn, F. J., & Ames, D. R. (2006). What’s good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: The benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman, Carlsmith, & Sears. (1970a). Attitude formation and change: Theoretical background; social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Freedman, Carlsmith, & Sears. (1970b). Liking, social psychology (p. 246, L 33–34). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, INC.Google Scholar
  22. Freedman, Carlsmith, & Sears. (1970c). Cognitive dissonance, social psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Freedman, Carlsmith, & Sears. (1970d). Liking, social psychology (p. 85, L 18–19). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Freedman, Carlsmith, & Sears (1970e). Attitude formation & change –theoretical background, social psychology (p. 248, L 4–6). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, E. T. (1990). Understanding cultural differences (p. 179). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1987). Hidden differences: Doing Business with the Japanese (pp. 16–18). Garden City: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. Hanggi, J., Koeneke, S., Bezzola, L., & Jancke, L. (2010). Structural neuroplasticity in sensorimotor network of professional female ballet dancers. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1196–1206.Google Scholar
  28. Higher cerebral functions. (2005). Nervous system, human, Encyclopedia Britannica, CDROM.Google Scholar
  29. Kirst, & Laura, K. (2011). Investigating the relationship between assertiveness and personality characteristics. HIM 1990–2015. Paper 1200.Google Scholar
  30. Leape, L. L., Shore, M. F., et al. (2012). Perspective: A culture of respect, Part 1: The nature and causes of disrespectful behavior by physicians. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(7), 845–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LePine, J. A., et al. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liberman, R. P. (1981). Behavior therapy vs insight-oriented therapy for repeated suicide attempters. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38(10), 1126–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luft, J. (1984). Group processes (3rd ed, 99. 11–20). Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.Google Scholar
  35. Oxford Talking Dictionary. (1998). CDROM. India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Phares, E. J. (1976). Locus of control in personality. Morristown: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ramachandran, V. S. (1998). Consciousness and body image: Lessons from phantom limbs, capgras syndrome and pain asymbolia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1851–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramachandran, V. S. (2005). Plasticity and functional recovery in neurology. Clinical Medicine, 5(4), 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramachandran, V. S., & Altschuler, E. E. (2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 132(Pt 7), 1693–1710. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp135. Epub 2009 Jun 8. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-ramachandran, D. (2000). Phantom limbs and neural plasticity. Archives Neurology, 57(3), 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramachandran, V. S., Brang, D., & McGeoch, P. D. (2010). Dynamic reorganization of referred sensations by movements of phantom limbs. NeuroReport, 21(10), 727–730. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833be9ab.Google Scholar
  42. Ramanaiah NV, Heerboth JR, Jinkerson DL, (1985). Personality and self-actualizing profiles of assertive people. Journal of Personality Assessment 49(4), 440.Google Scholar
  43. Robbins, S. P. (1998a). Organizational behavior. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Robbins, S. P. (1998b). Communication, organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications. London: N. D. Prenctice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Robbins, S. P. (2000). Organizational Behavior. 9th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar
  46. Robbins, S. P., & Hunsaker, P. L. (2007). Training in interpersonal skills (4th ed.). Delhi: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  47. Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Sanghi, S. (2007). Organizational behavior (12th ed., p. 355). Delhi: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Schaffer, J. A. (2005). Philosophy of mind, encyclopedia Britannica, CDROM.Google Scholar
  49. Schmit, M. J., Amel, E. L., & Ryan, A. M. (1993, Spring). Self-reported assertive job seeking behaviours of minimally educated job hunters. Personnel Psychology, 46(1); ABI/INFORM Collection pp 105.Google Scholar
  50. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thought. (2005). Encyclopedia Britannica Inc. CDROM.Google Scholar
  52. Unconscious. (2005). Encyclopedia Britannica Inc. CDROM.Google Scholar
  53. Vinacke, W. E. (2005). Thought, Encyclopedia Britannica Inc. CDROM.Google Scholar
  54. Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Editor’s introduction: What do we know about self and identity? Self & Identity. Sage, 1, 17–34.Google Scholar
  55. Winstanley, J. (2006). Key concepts in psychology (pp. 64–169). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City University College of AjmanAjmanUAE

Personalised recommendations