Integrating Assessments in Innovative Learning Process

  • Sarita Sahni


In this era of active exploration, a multidisciplinary curriculum must generate a right balance between learning in broader ways and expectations of diverse learners. A solid foundation for monitoring the efficaciousness of learning can be accomplished through activities incorporated and integrated in the curricula, thus making learning and development of competencies become central criteria for institutional effectiveness. Well-designed assessment criteria and procedures to ensure continual improvement in learning would lead to alignment of learning outcomes through integrated assessments. Best practices demonstrate learning through application of knowledge to solve relevant issues in novel situations. Capturing evidence of development of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor competencies in learning helps to meet the goals of educational programs.

Education must enable learners to discover what they need to learn than intake and output static knowledge. Employers and society will need graduates with greater mental agility and adaptability. To ensure continual improvement in learning would require that structured curricula are aligned with the learning outcomes through integrated assessments.


Learning Objectives Outcomes Assessment Innovative Educating 


  1. Adam, S. (2004) Using learning outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing learning outcomes at the local, national and international levels. Report on United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 2004, Herriot-Watt University.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, M. J. (2004). Assessing academic programs in higher education. Bolton: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2008). Teaching, learning, and assessing in a developmentally coherent curriculum. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Board of Educational Affairs. Retrieved from
  4. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy of learning, teaching, and assessment: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  6. Bergeron, J. (2008). Assessment workbook for academic programs. University of Richmond.
  7. Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: The Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). In praise of educational research: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of education objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
  11. Dang, Q. A. (2010). ASEM- seminar on credits and learning outcomes. Danish School of Education, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  12. Developing Outcomes and Objectives: The Learning Management Corporation.
  13. Georgia State University’s Rubric for Assessment Plans might provide a starting point for creating your own assessment plan rubric. (2012).
  14. Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
  15. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. King, P., & Baxter Magolda, M. (1996). A developmental perspective on learning. Journal of College Student Development.Google Scholar
  17. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II. The affective domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
  18. Maskell, D. (1999). Student-based assessment in a multi-disciplinary problem-based learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education, 238.
  19. McCarthy, M. (2001). Aligning learning outcomes, learning activities and assessments. Ireland: The Teaching and Learning Centre, University College Cork.Google Scholar
  20. Middle States Commission on Higher Education. (2006). Characteristics of excellence in higher education: Eligibility requirements and standards for accreditation. Philadelphia.
  21. North Carolina State University’s Internet Resources for Higher Education Outcomes Assessment. (2013). A great collection of online resources for program and course assessment.
  22. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L.. (2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE.
  23. Oblinger and Oblinger. (2005). Next Generation Learning Challenges, Educause,
  24. Suskie, L. (2009). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide.
  25. Pusateri, T., Halonen, J. S., Hill, B., & McCarthy, M. (2009). The assessment cyberguide for learning goals and outcomes.Google Scholar
  26. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.Google Scholar
  27. William, D. (2004). Keep learning on track: Integrating assessment with instruction. Philadelphia: International Association for Educational Assessment.Google Scholar
  28. Winona State University’s Sample Rubrics page contains hundreds of rubrics for a variety of courses and topics 2011.
  29. Yigit, A. S. (2003). Outcome-based program and course assessment. College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of Fashion and DesignDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations