Skip to main content

Semi-automatic Ontology Matching Approach for Integration of Various Data Models in Automotive

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems (HoloMAS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10444))

Abstract

All manufacturing companies need to be able to closely monitor the processes, labor, tooling, parts and throughput on the assembly plant floor. This might be a challenging task because of a large number of plant floor applications that operate using different hardware and software tools. In many cases, there are a large number of devices that need to be monitored and from which critical data must be extracted and analyzed. This situation calls for the use of an architecture that can support data from heterogeneous sources and support the analysis of data and communication with these devices. Ontologies can be developed to facilitate a proper understanding of the problem domain, and subsequently, knowledge from external sources can be shared through linked open data or directly integrated (mapped) using an ontology matching approach. In this paper, we demonstrate how ontological data description may facilitate interoperability between a company data model and new data sources as well as an update of stored data via ontology matching. The MAPSOM system (system for semi-automatic ontology matching) is introduced and described in this paper, and subsequently, an example of new data model integration is demonstrated using the MAPSOM system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Web Ontology Language - https://www.w3.org/OWL.

  2. 2.

    Knowledge Interchange Format - http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/knowledge-sharing/kif.

  3. 3.

    Microsoft Excel https://products.office.com/en-us/excel.

References

  1. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 18(4), 323–364 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benerecetti, M., Bouquet, P., Ghidini, C.: On the dimensions of context dependence: partiality, approximation, and perspective. In: Akman, V., Bouquet, P., Thomason, R., Young, R. (eds.) CONTEXT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2116, pp. 59–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). doi:10.1007/3-540-44607-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, P.A., Melnik, S., Churchill, J.E.: Incremental schema matching. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 1167–1170. VLDB Endowment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouquet, P., Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J., Franconi, E., Hitzler, P., Krotzsch, M., Serafini, L., Stamu, G., Sure, Y., Tessaris, S.: Specification of a Common Framework for Characterizing Alignment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Euzenat, J.: Towards a principled approach to semantic interoperability. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Ontology and Information Sharing, pp. 19–25 (2001). (No commercial editor)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P., et al.: Ontology Matching, vol. 18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber, T.R., et al.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ichise, R.: Machine learning approach for ontology mapping using multiple concept similarity measures. In: Seventh IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, ICIS 2008, pp. 340–346. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Standardized product ontology register and transfer by spreadsheets – Part 1: Logical structure for data parcels. International standard, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, CH (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jirkovský, V., Ichise, R.: MAPSOM: user involvement in ontology matching. In: Kim, W., Ding, Y., Kim, H.-G. (eds.) JIST 2013. LNCS, vol. 8388, pp. 348–363. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06826-8_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Jirkovský, V., Obitko, M.: Ontology mapping approach for fault classification in multi-agent systems. IFAC Proc. Vol. 46(9), 951–956 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kohonen, T.: Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural Netw. 37, 52–65 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohonen, T.: The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 21(1), 1–6 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ostrowski, D., Rychtyckyj, N., MacNeille, P., Kim, M.: Integration of big data using semantic web technologies. In: 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 382–385. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rychtyckyj, N., Raman, V., Sankaranarayanan, B., Kumar, P.S., Khemani, D.: Ontology re-engineering: a case study from the automotive industry. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3974–3981. AAAI Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ultsch, A.: Self-organizing neural networks for visualisation and classification. In: Opitz, O., Lausen, B., Klar, R. (eds.) Information and Classification, pp. 307–313. Springer, Heidelberg (1993). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-50974-2_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Valtchev, P., Euzenat, J.: Dissimilarity measure for collections of objects and values. In: Liu, X., Cohen, P., Berthold, M. (eds.) IDA 1997. LNCS, vol. 1280, pp. 259–272. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). doi:10.1007/BFb0052846

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Visser, P.R., Jones, D.M., Bench-Capon, T.J., Shave, M.J.: Assessing heterogeneity by classifying ontology mismatches. In: Proceedings of the FOIS, vol. 98 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported through the Ford Motor Company University Research Proposal (URP) program and by institutional resources for research by the Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Václav Jirkovský .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jirkovský, V., Kadera, P., Rychtyckyj, N. (2017). Semi-automatic Ontology Matching Approach for Integration of Various Data Models in Automotive. In: Mařík, V., Wahlster, W., Strasser, T., Kadera, P. (eds) Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems. HoloMAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10444. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64635-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64635-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64634-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64635-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics