Validating Intelligent Power and Energy Systems – A Discussion of Educational Needs
Traditional power systems education and training is flanked by the demand for coping with the rising complexity of energy systems, like the integration of renewable and distributed generation, communication, control and information technology. A broad understanding of these topics by the current/future researchers and engineers is becoming more and more necessary. This paper identifies educational and training needs addressing the higher complexity of intelligent energy systems. Education needs and requirements are discussed, such as the development of systems-oriented skills and cross-disciplinary learning. Education and training possibilities and necessary tools are described focusing on classroom but also on laboratory-based learning methods. In this context, experiences of using notebooks, co-simulation approaches, hardware-in-the-loop methods and remote labs experiments are discussed.
KeywordsCyber-Physical Energy Systems Education Learning Smart grids Training Validation
This work is supported by the European Communitys Horizon 2020 Program (H2020/2014–2020) under project “ERIGrid” (Grant Agreement No. 654113).
- 1.Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W.A., Brodeur, D.R.: The CDIO syllabus v2.0. An updated statement of goals for engineering education. In: 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark (2011)Google Scholar
- 2.Deese, A.: Development of smart electric power system (SEPS) laboratory for advanced research and undergraduate education. In: 2015 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting, p. 1 (2015)Google Scholar
- 7.Karady, G.G., Heydt, G.T., Olejniczak, K.J., Mantooth, H.A., Iwamoto, S., Crow, M.L.: Role of laboratory education in power engineering: is the virtual laboratory feasible? Part I. In: 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, vol. 3, pp. 1471–1477 (2000)Google Scholar
- 8.Kotsampopoulos, P., Kleftakis, V., Hatziargyriou, N.: Laboratory education of modern power systems using PHIL simulation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. PP(99), 1 (2016)Google Scholar
- 12.Neureiter, C., Engel, D., Trefke, J., Santodomingo, R., Rohjans, S., Uslar, M.: Towards consistent smart grid architecture tool support: from use cases to visualization. In: 2014 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe) (2014)Google Scholar
- 14.Pochacker, M., Sobe, A., Elmenreich, W.: Simulating the smart grid. In: IEEE PowerTech Grenoble (2013)Google Scholar
- 16.Rohjans, S., Lehnhoff, S., Schütte, S., Scherfke, S., Hussain, S.: Mosaik - a modular platform for the evaluation of agent-based smart grid control. In: IEEE/PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE) (2013)Google Scholar
- 17.Schütte, S., Scherfke, S., Tröschel, M.: Mosaik: a framework for modular simulation of active components in smart grids. In: IEEE First International Workshop on Smart Grid Modeling and Simulation (SGMS), pp. 55–60 (2011)Google Scholar
- 18.Steinbrink, C.: A nonintrusive uncertainty quantification system for modular smart grid co-simulation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oldenburg (2016)Google Scholar