Skip to main content

Heterogeneity and Subjectivism in Communication: From Trust and Reputation Mechanisms to Linguistic Norms and Collective Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 491 Accesses

Part of the book series: Computational Social Sciences ((CSS))

Abstract

Communication is a complex adaptive system because the organisms that communicate are complex adaptive systems themselves. This seems tautologic, but since communication is all about the means of transmitting and receiving the message and about the message itself, in heavily involves the sender and the receiver in ways that other types of exchanges do not (such as the exchange of goods or services). The means by which the sender and the receiver get involved in the exchange are also information and this makes information exchange incorporate both information and meta-information, an epistemic and ontological relationship that is different for the exchange of goods and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. G.A. Akerlof, The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84(3), 488–500 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Axelrod, The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.-L. Barabási, Linked: The New Science of Networks (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, 2003), pp. 409–410

    Google Scholar 

  4. U. Birchler, M. Bütler, Information Economics (Routledge, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Carley, On the evolution of social and organizational networks, in Networks in and Around Organizations, ed. by D. Knoke, S. Andrews, volume special issue of research on the Sociology of Organizations (JAI Press, Bingley, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.S. Coleman, E. Katz, H. Menzel, Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study (Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.S. Dodds, R. Muhamad, D.J. Watts, An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science 301(5634):827–829 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Erdös, A. Rényi, On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci. 5, 1761 (1960)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Friedkin, Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Soc. Netw. 3, 273–285 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Granovetter, Strength of weak ties, a network theory revisited. Soc. Theory 1, 201–233 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Granovetter, Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Soc. 91(3), 481–510 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Hannan, J. Freeman, Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49, 149–164 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F.A. Hayek, The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1776)

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Hirshleifer, Economics of information. Where are we in the theory of information? Am. Econ. Rev. 63(2), 31–39 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Hirshleifer, A. Glazer, Price Theory and Applications (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.O. Jackson, Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.O. Jackson, B.W. Rogers, Meeting strangers and friends of friends: how random are social networks? Am. Econ. Rev. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Knoke, R.S. Burt, Prominence, in Applied Network Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, 1983), pp. 195–222

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Krackhardt, K.M. Carley, A PCANS model of structure in organizations, in Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, pp. 113–119 (June 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Luca, Prehistoric signs and symbols from Transylvania (1). “the secret tablet” the neolithic and aeneolithic archaeological settlement from Tartaria-Gura Luncii (alba county). Brukenthal 10(1), 7–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. N.G. Mankiw, R. Reis, Sticky information versus sticky prices: a proposal to replace the new Keynesian Phillips curve. NBER Working Paper No. w8290 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.E.J. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2):167–256 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. M.E.J. Newman, Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(Suppl. 1):5200–5205 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. I.A. Paul, Enigma tablitelor de la tartaria. Conferintele Bibliotecii Astra, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  25. E.M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York, 2003), p. 551

    Google Scholar 

  26. J.R. Searle, D.C. Dennett, D.J. Chalmers, The Mystery of Consciousness (New York Review of Books, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. C.E. Shannon, W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. H.A. Simon, Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Ind. Corp. Chang. 11(3), 587–599 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G.J. Stigler, The economics of information. J. Polit. Econ. 69(3), 213–225 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. J.E. Stiglitz, C. Shapiro, Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. Am. Econ. Rev. 74(3), 433–444 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  31. T.W. Valente, Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc. Netw. 18(1), 69–89 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. H. Whitehead, L. Rendell, The Cultural Lives of Whales and Dolphins (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. W.A. Wickelgren, Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics. Mem. Cognit. 2(4), 775–780 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J.T. Wixted, The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 55, 235–269 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J.T. Wixted, E.B. Ebbesen, On the form of forgetting. Psychol. Sci. 2(6), 409–415 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berea, A. (2018). Heterogeneity and Subjectivism in Communication: From Trust and Reputation Mechanisms to Linguistic Norms and Collective Behavior. In: Emergence of Communication in Socio-Biological Networks. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64565-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics