Skip to main content

The Neoliberal Food Regime in Crisis?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Ecology, Food Regimes, and Food Sovereignty
  • 1474 Accesses

Abstract

Until the turn of the new millennium, neoliberalism appeared to be carrying all before it, without serious contradiction for this regime of accumulation. The collapse of state communism and the opening up of China and other centres of super-cheap labour as manufacturing zones for Northern transnational corporations enabled the attack on labour in the imperium to be mitigated by the import of ‘cheaps’ from the global South. As we have seen, this served a crucial legitimation function as well as maintaining satisfactory consumption levels in the global North. Environmental contradictions of productivist agriculture, of manufacturing, and of energy production in the imperium could also be mitigated through shifting these activities to the periphery. As the first decade of the new millennium progressed, however, a variety of contradictions, in terms of capital accumulation, in terms of the supply of basic needs to the global majority (perhaps most notably food), and in terms of the biophysical fabric of the planet and resource supply (all the while representing contradictions of capital for the subaltern classes and extra-human nature), began to ‘come home to roost’ as mounting contradictions for capital, and for neoliberalism in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The agrarian question, referring back to the original work of that name by Karl Kautsky (1988), explores the impact of capitalism on agrarian society, the role of agriculture in the course of capitalist development and, particularly, the political role of the peasantry in facilitating, or obstructing, radical social change.

References

  • Akram-Lodhi, A.H., and C. Kay, eds. 2009. Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation, and the Agrarian Question. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almas, R., H. Bjorkhaug, and K. Ronningen. 2009. Working Group 2.3: ‘The New Productivism: Agricultural Responses to Increasing Food and Energy Prices and Climate Change’. XXIII ESRS Congress Vaasa 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. 2012. Contemporary Imperialism and the Agrarian Question. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 1 (1): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araghi, F. 2009a. Accumulation by Displacement: Global Enclosures, the Food Crisis, and the Ecological Contradictions of Capitalism. Review XXXII (1): 113–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. The Invisible Hand and the Visible Foot: Peasants, Dispossession and Globalization. In Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question, ed. A.H. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 111–147. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 2009. Agrarian Questions from Transition to Globalization. In Peasants and Globalization: Political Economy, Rural Transformation and the Agrarian Question, ed. A.H. Akram-Lodhi and C. Kay, 239–261. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biel, R. 2012. The Entropy of Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla, O. 2015. China’s Geopolitical Strategy in the Andean Region. In BRICS: An Anti-capitalist Critique, ed. P. Bond and A. Garcia, 135–147. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S.M., P. McMichael, and I. Scoones. 2010. The Politics of Biofuels, Land and Agrarian Change: Editors’ Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4): 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. 2006. Planet of Slums. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M., and S.M. Borras. 2016. Political Dynamics of Transnational Agrarian Movements. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. 2010. The Unnatural Coupling: Food and Global Finance. Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (1): 72–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isakson, S.R. 2014. Food and Finance: The Financial Transformation of Agri-Food Supply Chains. Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (5): 749–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. 2015. Three Dimensions of the Crisis. In Crisis and Contradiction: Marxist Perspectives on Latin America in the Global Political Economy, ed. S. Spronk and J. Webber, 273–301. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. 1988. The Agrarian Question. Vol. 1 and 2. London: Zwan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, C. 2006. Rural Poverty and Development Strategies in Latin America. Journal of Agrarian Change 6 (4): 455–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. 2010. Agrofuels in the Food Regime. Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4): 609–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Halifax/Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. 2010. The End of the Road? Agricultural Revolutions in the Capitalist World-Ecology, 1450–2010. Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (3): 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Transcending the Metabolic Rift: A Theory of Crises in the Capitalist World-Ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (1): 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S., and P. Yeros, eds. 2005. Reclaiming the Land: The Resurgence of Rural Movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 2011. Reclaiming the Nation: The Return of the National Question in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer, and A. Wright. 2009. Nature’s Matrix: Linking Agriculture, Conservation and Food Sovereignty. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., and H. Veltmayer. 2001. Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2011. Social Movements in Latin America: Neoliberalism and Popular Resistance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. 2016. Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century: Globalization, Super-Exploitation, and Capital’s Final Crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedile, J. 2015. Reflections on the Tendencies of Capital in Agriculture and Challenges for Peasant Movements in Latin America. In The Struggle for Food Sovereignty: Alternative Development and the Renewal of Peasant Societies Today, ed. R. Herrera and K.C. Lau, 35–54. London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tilzey, M. 2000. Natural Areas, the Whole Countryside Approach and Sustainable Agriculture. Land Use Policy 17 (4): 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Conservation and Sustainability. In The Sustainability of Rural Systems: Geographical Interpretations, ed. I. Bowler, C. Bryant, and C. Cocklin, 147–168. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Neo-liberalism, the WTO and New Modes of Agri-Environmental Governance in the EU, USA and Australia. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 14 (1): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilzey, M., and C. Potter. 2007. Neo-liberalism, Neo-mercantilism and Multifunctionality: Contested Political Discourses in European Post-Fordist Rural Governance. In International Perspectives on Rural Governance: New Power Relations in Rural Economies and Societies, ed. L. Cheshire, V. Higgins, and G. Lawrence, 115–129. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Productivism Versus Post-productivism? : Modes of Agri-Environmental Governance in Post-Fordist Agricultural Transitions. In Sustainable Rural Systems: Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Communities, ed. G. Robinson, 41–63. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittonell, P. 2014. Food Security and Ecosystem Services in a Changing World: It Is Time for Agroecology? Paper Presented to the International Symposium on Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrition, FAO, Rome, September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. 2011. The Ecology of Agroecosystems. Boston: Barlett and Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltmeyer, H. 2017. The Contemporary Dynamics of Extractive Capital(ism) in Latin America. ICAS International Colloquium, The Future of Food and Challenges for Agriculture in the 21st Century. Colloquium Paper No. 6. Vitoria-Gasteiz, April 24–26, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, T. 2007. The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming. London: Zed Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tilzey, M. (2018). The Neoliberal Food Regime in Crisis?. In: Political Ecology, Food Regimes, and Food Sovereignty. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64556-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64556-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64555-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64556-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics