The Application of the New War Thesis to the Conflicts of Xinjiang, Kashmir, and Assam and Nagaland

  • Abdulsalam Dallal
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Post the Cold War which ended in 1991, several scholars have argued about the change in conflicts’ nature which started to take place in the world, and they touched upon different elements involved in them. Mary Kaldor has set these differences in her book New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in the Global Era. Her new wars thesis proved to be applicable to different areas of conflicts despite that she applied it first to the conflict of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This chapter navigates the new war thesis facets which can be traced in the conflict of Xinjiang in China, Kashmir, and Assam and Nagaland in the Indian Northeast.


New wars Kaldor Thesis Facets Conflicts Xinjiang Kashmir Assam and Nagaland 


  1. Amnesty international. (1999). Amnesty International Report 1999, AI INDEX: POL 10/03/99.Google Scholar
  2. Amnesty international. (2015). “Denied” failures in accountability in Jammu and Kashmir. London: Amnesty International Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Baranovitch, N. (2003). From the margins to the centre: The Uyghur challenge in Beijing. The China Quarterly, 175, 726–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becquelin, N. (2000). Xinjiang in the nineties. The China Journal, 44(44) 65–90.Google Scholar
  5. Bhave, V. (2016). Available: (Accessed December 02, 2016).
  6. Blank, S. (2003). Xinjiang and China’s security 1. Global Economic Review, 32, 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, M. (2010). China, Xinjiang and the internationalisation of the Uyghur issue. Global Change, Peace & Security, 22, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dillon, M. (2003). Xinjiang: China’s Muslim far northwest. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Gladney, D. C. (2003). Islam in China: Accommodation or separatism? The China Quarterly, 174, 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han, E. (2011). From domestic to international: The politics of ethnic identity in Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia. Nationalities Papers, 39, 941–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harbom, L., Havard, S., & Havard, M. (2009). UCDP/PRIO armed conflict dataset codebook. Codebook. Uppsala Conflict Data Program and International Peace Research Institute, Oslo.
  12. Hussain, W. (2003). We picked up our Aks and fled. The Sentinel, 24, December 2003.Google Scholar
  13. Kaldor, M. (2006). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Stanford University Press, California.Google Scholar
  14. Kaldor, M. (2009b). Available at: (Accessed December 27, 2016).
  15. Kaldor, M. (2013). In defence of new wars. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(1): 4, 1–16. DOI:
  16. Mukherjee, K. (2010). The Uyghur question in contemporary China. Strategic Analysis, 34, 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mukherjee, K. (2013). “New Wars” in contemporary South Asia? Peace Review, 25, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mukherjee, K. (2016). ‘New Wars’ in contemporary China? Canadian Military Journal, 16, 29–37.Google Scholar
  19. Newman, E. (2004). The ‘new wars’ debate: A historical perspective is needed. Security dialogue, 35, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schluessel, E. T. (2009). History, identity, and mother-tongue education in Xinjiang. Central Asian Survey, 28, 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaw, M. (2000). The contemporary mode of warfare? Mary Kaldor’s theory of new wars: Review essay. Review of International Political Economy, 7, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tariq, S. (2011). Problem in Northeast India: A case study of Nagaland. Spotlight on Regional Affairs, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  23. Zang, X. (2013). Major determinants of Uyghur ethnic consciousness in Ürümchi. Modern Asian Studies, 47, 2046–2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PPRLancaster UniversityBailriggUK

Personalised recommendations