Advertisement

Erçetin’s Plasma Leadership Model in the Context of Education and School Administration

  • Bilge Burçin Karaca
  • Ayşe Aygin Silsüpür
  • Nalan Sıdıka Alyamaç
  • Dilber Gizem Serter
  • Ernur Serter
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Leadership remains the fountain of educational institutions and the education system. There is no way one can discuss education and educational institutions without a leadership vacuum. Leadership has, thus, attracted researchers at all times seeking to establish the most ideal leadership style or approach. Nevertheless, research continues to stall in lieu of situational issues influencing leadership. That explainsk why studies on leadership have gone beyond being ordinary to feature applicability of hitherto external aspects to the concept of leadership. One of such attempts led to the concretization of plasma leadership through a model developed by Erçetin (Understanding Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Turkey with plasma as a metaphor of the kourth state of matter. In Ş.Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2014, (pp. 1–13). Springer, Switzerland, Ch 1, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18693-1, 2016). This article, therefore, examines Erçetin’s plasma leadership model (Erçetin, Understanding Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Turkey with plasma as a metaphor of the fourth state of matter. In Ş.Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2014, (pp. 1–13). Springer, Switzerland, Ch 1, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18693-1, 2016) which creates a new theoretical framework in the field of leadership. This is done in the context of school and educational management.

Keywords

Plasma Leadership Plasma leadership Education Educational management 

References

  1. Bennett, N., Harvey, J.A., Wise, C. and Wood, P. A. (2003). Distributed leadership: A desk study. www.ncsl.org. Uk/literature reviewsGoogle Scholar
  2. Demir, H. (2012). Türkiye’de liderlik araştırmaları ve örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki: Bir meta analizi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Genel Kurmay Başkanlığı, Stratejik Araştırmalar Enstitüsü, İstanbul.Google Scholar
  3. Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2016). Understanding Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Turkey with plasma as a metaphor of the fourth state of matter. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2014 (pp. 1–13). Switzerland., Ch 1: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18693-1_1.
  4. Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Bülbül, M. Ş., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2013). A multi-dimensional approach to leadership in chaotic environments. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and complexity theory for management: Nonlinear dynamics (pp. 89–104). Hershey: IGI Global.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2509-9.ch005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Turan, S., ve Bektaş, F. (2014). Liderlik (Ed. Turan, S.). Eğitim Yönetimi: Teori, Araştırma ve Uygulama. Ankara: PegemA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bilge Burçin Karaca
    • 1
  • Ayşe Aygin Silsüpür
    • 1
  • Nalan Sıdıka Alyamaç
    • 1
  • Dilber Gizem Serter
    • 1
  • Ernur Serter
    • 1
  1. 1.Hacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations