Advertisement

Decision-Making Processes as Part of Administration in Chaotic and Non-chaotic Atmosphere in Educational Organizations

  • Pınar Temoçin
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Decision making is without doubt an integral part of human life and institutional working, and as it is the case in any process pertaining to successful administration to be carried out in organizations, it has its own place within all the dimensions of an established hierarchy of any kind. Ashcraft (1998) (Fundamentals of cognition. New York: Longman) calls it the process of making decisions, a rather slower and more conscious part and aspect of cognitive thinking. It does entail, surely with countless other counterparts, rational thinking, reasoning, and envision; thus, decision making inevitably calls for a thorough analysis of any given situation, oftentimes, as well as meticulous evaluation of the future of the organization with all its differing entities. What is more, this frequently has to be realized in short periods of time. In addition to the aforementioned elements inherent in the very process, several other factors come into play during times of decision making such as relatively more subjective parameters like intuitional thinking and using what one’s gut feeling signals.

In light of the relevant literature research, it is witnessed that the time when a decision is to be made, the person to make the decision and their certain characteristics, e.g., certain demographic features, and so on are all influential in the type and nature of the decision made. It is also observed that whether the decision is made at the time of a crisis belonging to a rather chaotic period impacts decision making to a degree.

Keywords

Decision making Organizations Educational administration 

References

  1. Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2016). Foreign policy decision making as a chaotic phenomenon: Angela Merkel’s foreign policy between 2005–2009. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Women leaders in chaotic environments examinations of leadership using complexity theory (pp. 21–34). Ankara: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayton, P. (2005). Judgement and decision making. In N. Braisby & A. Gellatly (Eds.), Cognitive psychology (1st ed., pp. 382–417). Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L. M., Bruce, M. L., Hyer, K., Mills, W. L., Vongxaiburana, E., & Polivka-West, L. A. (2009). A pilot study evaluating the feasibility of psychological first aid for nursing home residents. Clinical Gerontologist, 32(3), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28, 432–446.Google Scholar
  7. Daft, R. L. (2003). Management (6th ed.). Mason: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  8. Drucker, P. F. (2001). The essential Drucker: Selections from the management works of Peter F Drucker. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  9. French, S. (2008). Decision analysis. In B. S. Everitt & E. L. Melnick (Eds.), Encyclopedia of quantitative risk analysis and assessment. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fellows, L. K. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of human decision making: A review and conceptual framework. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 59.Google Scholar
  12. Gasaway, R. (2007). Making intuitive decisions under stress: Understanding fireground incident command decision-making. International Fire Service Journal of Leadership and Management, 1(1), 12.Google Scholar
  13. Gentner, D., & Collins, A. (1981). Studies of inference from lack of knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 9, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glasman, N., & Fuller, J. (1992). Assessing the decision-making patterns of school principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 6(3), 22–30.Google Scholar
  15. Glucksberg, S., & McCloskey, M. (1981). Decisions about ignorance: Knowing that you don’t know. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 311–325.Google Scholar
  16. Griffin, G. A. (1995). Influences of shared decision making on school and classroom activity: Conversations with five teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2006). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes, D. (1996). Taking nothing for granted: The introduction of collaborative decision making in a primary school. Educational Management and Administration, 24(3), 291300.Google Scholar
  19. Heller, H. C. (1971). Altitudinal zonation of chipmunks (eutamias): Interspecific aggression. Ecology, 52, 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschfield, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issuecontingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.Google Scholar
  22. Keaten, J. A. (1995). Effects of the Penn State Reticence Program on communication behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, M. L. (1997). Decision making task complexity: Model development and initial testing. Journal of Nursing Education, 36(3), 114–120.Google Scholar
  24. May, B. (1996). On decision making. Physical Therapy, 76(11), 1232–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McFarland, D. J. (1974). Time-sharing as a behavioural phenomenon. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 5, 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The manager’s job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 68, 163–176.Google Scholar
  28. Pratt, M. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rue, L. W., & Byars, L. (2003). Management, Skills and Application (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  30. Schon, D. A. (1988). From technical rationality to reflection-inaction. In J. Downie & A. Elstein (Eds.), Professional judgement: A reader in clinical decision making (pp. 60–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative Behavior: A study of Decision‑making Processes in Administrative Organization, with new introduction (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, M. C. L. (2006). Clinical decision making in acute care cardiopulmonary physiotherapy. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.Google Scholar
  35. Thomas, S. R., Shoham, Y., Schwartz, A., & Kraus, S. (1991). Preliminary thoughts on an agent description language. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 6, 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uğurlu, C. T. (2007). Gevşek yapılı sistemler olarak okulların üç kavramı: Karar verme, liderlik ve çatışma [Decision making, leadership and conflict in primary schools as loosely coupled system]. Bayburt University Journal of Educational Faculty, 2(3), 15–30.Google Scholar
  37. Vroom, V., & Yetton, P. (1973). Leadership and Decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weick, K. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whitney, S. N. (2003). A new model of medical decisions: Exploring the limits of shared decision making. Medical Decision Making, 23, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yates, J. F., & Estin, P. A. (1998). Decision making. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 186–196). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Başkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations