Claim of Values in Dictionaries: An Example of the Anarchist Islands Model

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

Recently, the “Anarchist Islands Model” has been proposed as a political conceptualization although it includes a geographical term. It offers a method for the current state of affairs. It is based on a statement on complexity science paradigms. Chaotic Awareness Simulation (CAS) theory coincides with the Anarchist Islands Model when it construes people’s imaginations, considerations, and behaviors in the context of ethics. In this article, as an example of efforts in claiming values in dictionaries implied in the Anarchist Islands Model, we focus on the story of the Turkish word “müsait”/available for Anarchist Islands. This word is described with a meaning of women who flirt with somebody in the dictionary of the Turkish Language Institution (TDK) (tdk.gov.tr). Some of the citizens began a campaign claiming that this word should be withdrawn from the dictionary. At the end of this campaign, TDK declared formally that the meaning of “müsait” is not the same in the new issue of the dictionary. Both TDK and other dictionaries declared formally their meanings. So, we observe the change; some citizens want not only to squat in urban areas (Gezi Park) but also protect their values.

Keywords

Simulation theories in social science Complexity Chaotic Awareness Theory Anarchist Islands Model Gezi Park protests 

References

  1. Akdeniz, K.G. (2010). Disorder in complex human system. In H Fritzsch, & Phua, K.K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference in Honour of Murray Gell-Mann’s 80th Birthday Quantum Mechanics, Elementary Particles, Quantum Cosmology and Complexity: Singapore World Scientific, (pp. 630–637).Google Scholar
  2. Akdeniz, K. G. (2015). Chaotic awareness in Gezipark. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin & S. Banerjee (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2013 (pp. 183–187). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. New York: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. De Landa, M. (2000). A thousand years of nonlinear history. New York: Swerve Editions.Google Scholar
  5. Eliguzel, A.H., Tangün, Y.A. (2014). In Ç. Yalçın (Ed.), XIV. International symposium on disorder systems: Theory and its applications. Anarchist islands and Zuhur. Turkey: Izmir and TÜFOB I. Philosophy Student Conference. An Essay about the Association of Anarchist Islands and Complexity Science. METU, Ankara.Google Scholar
  6. Kropotkin, P. (2007). On order (1881). Siyahî Culture Journal “Nothing is Black!” 9:18–20, İstanbul: Scala Press.Google Scholar
  7. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state, how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Wallerstein, I. (2004). Uncertainties of knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Key Further Readings

  1. Akdeniz, K. G., & Anastasopoulos, N. (2016). Chaotic awareness and simulacra in the recent emergence of the self-organized multitude. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Ed.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2014. <8 (pp. 23–28). Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. New York: Cambridge Unıversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Wallerstein, I. (1996). Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the restructuring of the social sciences, open the social sciences. New York: Standford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dokuz Eylül UniversityİzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Pamukkale UniversityDenizliTurkey
  3. 3.Disorder Systems InstituteİzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations