Skip to main content

Return on Investment in Quantum-Gravity Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Experimental Search for Quantum Gravity

Part of the book series: FIAS Interdisciplinary Science Series ((FIAS))

  • 1111 Accesses

Abstract

I characterize the objectives of fundamental physics in such a way that the only admissible “return” on investments in a research program is the experimental discovery of previously unknown physical phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One of my favorite examples of reinterpretation of experimental results is provided by comparing the description of experimental results on the gain or loss of weight by materials being burned that was fashionable at the time of the Phlogiston Theory and the description of those same experimental results that became fashionable after the discovery of oxygen. The discovery of oxygen in no way affects the robustness of previous experimental results on the gain or loss of weight by materials being burned. The discovery of oxygen in no way led to the discovery of unnoticed sources of systematic error in those experimental results. The same experimental results apply equally well to the interpretations informed by the discovery of oxygen. Experiments done nowdays on the gain or loss of weight by materials being burned still find results for those changes of weight that are fully consistent with the ones from 3 centuries ago. Surely now Phlogiston Theory feels like a pretty strange sort of interpretation. Chances are our current interpretation of gain or loss of weight by materials being burned will feel pretty funny at some point in the future. However, experimental facts gathered 300 years ago on gain or loss of weight by materials being burned are still equally valuable now and will still be equally valuable in the future.

References

  1. Patrizii, L., Spurio, M.: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 279 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amelino-Camelia, G.: Living Rev. Rel. 16, 5 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amelino-Camelia, G., Smolin, L.: Phys. Rev. D 80, 084017 (2009). arXiv:0906.3731

  4. Amelino-Camelia, G., Ellis, J., Mavromatos, N.E., Nanopoulos, D.V., Sarkar, S.: Nature 393, 763 (1998). arXiv:astro-ph/9712103

  5. Gambini, R., Pullin, J.: Phys. Rev. D 59, 124021 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Amelino-Camelia, G., Guetta, D., Piran, T.: Astrophys. J. 806(2), 269 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stecker, F.W., Scully, S.T., Liberati, S., Mattingly, D.: Phys. Rev. D 91, 045009 (2015). arXiv:1411.5889

  8. Amelino-Camelia, G., Barcaroli, L., D’Amico, G., Loret, N., Rosati, G.: Phys. Lett. B 761, 318 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Amelino-Camelia, G., Barcaroli, L., D’Amico, G., Loret, N., Rosati, G.: arXiv:1609.03982 [gr-qc]

  10. Zhang, S., Ma, B.Q.: Astropart. Phys. 61, 108 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, H., Ma, B.Q.: Astropart. Phys. 82, 72 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, H., Ma, B.Q.: Phys. Lett. B 760, 602 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Amelino-Camelia, G., D’Amico, G., Rosati, G., Loret, N.: arXiv:1612.02765

  14. Motterlini, M.: Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 33, 487 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenstein, B.: Ace on the River. Last Knight Publishing Company (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I first presented my notion of winning probability for fundamental-physics research programs in September 2015 at a meeting hosted by the University of Wroclaw. I am indebted to Jerzy Kowalski-Klikman for reassuring me that such an unusual choice of topic could be a valuable contribution to that meeting. The choice of illustrative examples that I should focus on, among quantum-gravity-phenomenology research programs, took shape at a meeting hosted by the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies in September 2016, also inspired by a discussion moderated by Sabine Hossenfelder, in which Sabine inspiringly urged participants to discuss their subjective priorities among quantum-gravity-phenomenology research programs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Amelino-Camelia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amelino-Camelia, G. (2018). Return on Investment in Quantum-Gravity Research. In: Hossenfelder, S. (eds) Experimental Search for Quantum Gravity. FIAS Interdisciplinary Science Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64537-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics