Skip to main content

Emerging Technologies for Workplace Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
E-Learning in the Workplace

Abstract

This chapter outlines the emerging technologies for workplace learning and how they are used to support workplace learning in a variety of ways with respect to learning content management systems, social media and social interaction, mobile and ubiquitous learning facilities, computer simulations and immersive virtual reality, educational data mining and learning analytics, computer-based learning assistance, and cognitive processing and high-order thinking facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 61–75). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benlamri, R., Klett, F., & Wang, M. (2016). Editorial: Models, technologies and approaches toward widening the open access to learning and education. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, M. B., & Butcher-Green, J. D. (2009). Agent-customized training for human learning performance enhancement. Computers & Education, 53(3), 966–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Kou, X., Xu, S., & Sheu, F.-R. (2015). Understanding the self-directed online learning preferences, goals, achievements, and challenges of MIT OpenCourseWare subscribers. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, B. C. (2008). Ubiquitous learning, ubiquitous computing, and lived experience. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Ubiquitous Learning (pp. 21–30). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, B., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 156–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N. S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000-2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11, 56–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. In Journal of interactive Media in Education. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. (2014). MOOCs come of age. T+D, 68(1), 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, H., Wang, M., Ran, W., Yang, S. J. H., Liao, J., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2011). Design of a performance-oriented workplace e-learning system using ontology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3372–3382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, J., Chen, Y., Ding, Z., & Ruan, M. (2012). Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Computers & Education, 58(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2005). Tools for representing problems and the knowledge required to solve them. In S. O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and information visualization (pp. 82–94). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P. (Ed.). (2000). Computers as cognitive tools II: No more walls: Theory change, paradigm shifts and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, A. K., & Ferneley, E. (2006). Embodied agents in e-learning environments: An exploratory case study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2006). Beyond e-learning: Approaches and technologies to enhance organizational knowledge, learning, and performance. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., & Piccolo, R. F. (2009). Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, P., & Hadar, I. (2007). Applying ontology-based rules to conceptual modeling: A reflection on modeling decision making. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(5), 599–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2016). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel, W. R. (2003). Handhelds go to school: Lessons learned. IEEE Computer, 36(9), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2015). Web 2.0/3.0 in the workplace. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 844–846). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Cheng, B., Chen, J., Mercer, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). The use of web-based collaborative concept mapping to support group learning and interaction in an online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Jacobson, M. J. (2011). Guest editorial: Knowledge visualization for learning and knowledge management. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Peng, J., Cheng, B., Zhou, H., & Liu, J. (2011). Knowledge visualization for self-regulated learning. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., & Spector, J. M. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 68, 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Wang, M., Grotzer, T. A., Liu, J., & Johnson, J. M. (2016). Visualizing complex processes using a cognitive-mapping tool to support the learning of clinical reasoning. BMC Medical Education, 16, 216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Wang, M., Johnson, J. M., & Grotzer, T. A. (2014). Improving the learning of clinical reasoning through computer-based cognitive representation. Medical Education Online, 19, 25940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, M. (2018). Emerging Technologies for Workplace Learning. In: E-Learning in the Workplace. Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64532-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64532-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64530-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64532-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics