Advertisement

Evolutionary Approaches to Understanding Religion

Chapter

Abstract

The ubiquity of religion, cross-culturally and historically, suggests that it is likely to have an evolutionary basis. In this chapter we critically review evolutionary approaches to understanding religion by looking, in turn, at three main perspectives: religion as a by-product, religion as an adaptation, and religion as the product of cultural evolutionary processes. It is argued that each of these approaches can potentially account for important aspects of religion and that frameworks which integrate by-product and adaptationist accounts and draw on the idea of cultural evolution are particularly promising.

Keywords

By-product hypothesis Supernatural punishment Costly signally Big Gods Cultural evolution Religion 

References

  1. Abell, F., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development, 15, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amore, R. C. (2014). Buddhist traditions. In W. G. Oxtoby, R. C. Amore, & A. Hussain (Eds.), World religions: Eastern traditions (3rd ed., pp. 184–261). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, Q. D., & Bourrat, P. (2011). Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 32, 41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, Q. D., & Whitehouse, H. (2011). The cultural morphospace of ritual form: Examining modes of religiosity cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, J. L. (2007). Cognitive science of religion: What is it and why is it? Religion Compass, 1, 768–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00042x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett, J. L. (2012). Born believers: The science of children’s religious belief. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2013). Explaining moral religions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17, 272–280. doi: 10.1016/j. tics.2013.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumard, N., & Chevallier, C. (2015). The nature and dynamics of world religions: A life-history approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, 20151593. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellah, R. N. (2011). Religion in human evolution: From the palaeolithic to the axial age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bering, J. (2011). The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Bering, J., & Bjorklund, D. F. (2004). The natural emergence of reasoning about the afterlife as a developmental regularity. Developmental Psychology, 40, 217–233. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boehm, C. (2012). Moral origins: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Botero, C. A., Gardner, B., Kirby, K. R., Bulbulia, J., Gavin, M. C., & Gray, R. D. (2014). The ecology of religious beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 16784–16789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408701111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourrat, P. (2015). Origins and evolution of religion from a Darwinian point of view: Synthesis of different theories. In T. Heams, P. Huneman, G. Lecointre, & M. Silberstein (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary thinking in the sciences (pp. 761–780). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The human instincts that fashion gods, spirits and ancestors. London, UK: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, G. R., Dickins, T. E., Sear, R., & Laland, K. N. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of human behavioural diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 313–324. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, G. R., & Richerson, P. J. (2014). Applying evolutionary theory to human behaviour: Past differences and current debates. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16, 105–128. doi: 10.1007/s10818-013-9166-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bulbulia, J. (2006). Nature’s medicine: Religiosity as an adaptation for health and cooperation. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where god and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (vol. 1, pp. 87–121). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Bulbulia, J., & Sosis, R. (2011). Signalling theory and the evolution of religious cooperation. Religion, 41, 363–388. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological inquiry, 6, 1–30. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptation, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533–548. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. G., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126. doi: 10.1037/a0018413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 201–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. London, UK: Black Swan.Google Scholar
  26. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). The origin of religion as a small-scale phenomenon. In S. Clarke, R. Powell, & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation (pp. 48–66). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Durrant, R., Adamson, S., Todd, F., & Sellman, D. (2009). Drug use and addiction: An evolutionary perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 1049–1056. doi: 10.3109/00048670903270449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Durrant, R., & Ellis, B. J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology. In R. J. Nelson & S. J. Y. Mizumori (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 3. Behavioral neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 26–51). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
  29. Durrant, R., & Haig, B. D. (2001). How to pursue the adaptationist program in psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 357–380. doi: 10.1080/09515080120088067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Durrant, R., & Thakker, J. (2003). Substance use and abuse: Cultural and historical perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2011). Evolutionary explanations in the social and behavioural sciences. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 361–370. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2012). The role of evolutionary explanations in criminology. Journal of Philosophical and Theoretical Criminology, 4, 1–37.Google Scholar
  33. Durrant, R., & Ward, T. (2015). Evolutionary criminology: Toward a comprehensive explanation for crime. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). How do rituals affect cooperation? Human Nature, 24, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gervais, W. M. (2013). Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 8, 380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hafer, C. L., & Sutton, R. (2016). Belief in a just world. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, D. L., Cohen, A. B., Meyer, K. K., Varley, A. H., & Brewer, G. A. (2015). Costly signalling increases trust, even across religious affiliations. Psychological Science, 26, 1368–1376. doi: 10.1177/0956797615576473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Henrich, J. (2016). The secret of our success: How learning from others drove human evolution, domesticated our species, and made us smart. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, D. (2016). God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Johnson, D., & Reeve, Z. (2013). The virtues of intolerance: Is religion as an adaptation for war? In S. Clarke, R. Powell, & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation (pp. 67–83). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, D. D. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods. Human Nature, 16(4), 410–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, K. A., Li, Y. J., & Cohen, A. B. (2017). Fundamental social motives and the varieties of religious experience. Religion, Brain & Behaviour. Advance Online Publication. doi:  10.1080/2153599X.2014.918684
  44. Jost, J. T., Hawkins, C. B., Nosek, B. A., Hennes, E. P., Stern, C., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, J. (2014). Belief in a just god (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56–81. doi: 10.1037/a0033220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanazawa, S. (2015). Where do gods come from? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 306–313. doi: 10.1037/re10000033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kelly, R. L. (2013). The lifeways of hunter-gatherers: The foraging spectrum. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirkpatrick, L. (2005). Attachment, evolution, and the psychology of religion. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kirkpatrick, L. (2006). Religion is not an adaptation. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where god and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (vol. 1, pp. 159–179). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Kirkpatrick, L. (2011). The role of evolutionary psychology within an interdisciplinary science of religion. Religion, 41, 329–339. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lanman, J. A., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2017). Religious actions speak louder than words: Exposure to credibility-enhancing displays predicts theism. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7, 3–16. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1117011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCauley, R. N. (2011). Why religion is natural and science is not. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain culture and synthesise the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mitchell, S. D. (2009). Unsimple truths: Science, complexity, and policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morris, I. (2014). War, what is it good for? The role of conflict in civilization, from primates to robots. London, UK: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  56. Nettle, D., Gibson, M. A., Lawson, D. W., & Sear, R. (2013). Human behavioral ecology: Current research and future prospects. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 1031–1040. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ars222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Norenzayan, A. (2016). Theodiversity. Annual Review of Psychology. Advance Online Publication. doi:  10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033426
  59. Norenzayan, A., Gervais, W. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in personal God. PloS ONE, 7, e36880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Willard A. K., Slingerland, W. E., Gervais, R. A., McNamara, R. A., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Advance Online Publication.Google Scholar
  61. Peoples, H. C., Duda, P., & Marlowe, F. W. (2016). Hunter-gatherers and the origins of religion. Human Nature. Advance Online Publication, 27, 261–282.Google Scholar
  62. Peoples, H. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2012). Subsistence and the evolution of religion. Human Nature, 23, 253–269. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9148-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Power, E. A. (2017). Discerning devotion: Testing the signalling theory of religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Powell, R., & Clarke, S. (2012). Religion as an evolutionary byproduct: A critique of the standard model. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 63, 457–486. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axr035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reddish, P., Tok, P., & Kundt, R. (2016). Religious cognition and behaviour in autism: The role of mentalizing. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 95–112. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2014.1003518
  66. Repstad, P., & Furseth, I. (2013). Introduction to the sociology of religion. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  67. Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., … Ross, C. (2016). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. e30. Advance Online Publication. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X1400106X.
  68. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Richerson, P. J., & Newson, L. (2008). Is religion adaptive. Yes, No, Neutral, but mostly, we don’t know. In J. Bulbulia, R. Sosis, & E. Harris (Eds.), The evolution of religion: Studies, theories & critiques. Santa Margarita, CA: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  70. Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., & Raij, T. T. (2014). Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movements than skeptics: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 9, 400–411. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.906366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roes, F. L., & Raymond, M. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rottman, J., Zhu, L., Wang, W., Schillaci, R. S., Clark, K. J., & Kelemen, D. (2017). Cultural influences on the teleological stance: Evidence from China. Religion, Brain & Behaviour, 7, 17–26. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.1118402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scarre, C. (2013). The human past: World prehistory and the development of human societies (3rd ed.). London, UK: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  74. Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1, 46–99. doi: 10.1080/2153599X.2011.558707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schmitt, D. P., & Fuller, R. C. (2015). On the varieties of sexual experience. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 314–326. doi: 10.1037/re10000036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smart, N., & Denny, F. (2007). Atlas of the world’s religions (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, E. A., Mulder, M., & Hill, K. (2001). Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: A guide for the perplexed. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 128–135. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02077-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, Z., & Arrow, H. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on religion: An overview and synthesis. EvoS Journal: The Journal of the Evolutionary Studies Consortium, 2, 48–66.Google Scholar
  79. Sosis, R. (2009). The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 315–332. doi: 10.1163/156770909X12518536414411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behaviour. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signalling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 211–239. doi: 10.1177/1069397103251426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sosis, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2011). The behavioural ecology of religion: The benefits and costs of one evolutionary approach. Religion, 41, 341–362. doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.604514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Strassman, B. I., Kurapati, N. T., Hug, E. E., Gillespie, B. W., Karafet, T. M., & Hammer, M. F. (2012). Religion as a means to assure paternity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 9781–9785. doi: 10.1037/pnas.1110442109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stringer, C. (2011). The origin of our species. London, UK: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  85. Terrizzi, J. A. (2017). Is religion an evolutionarily evoked disease-avoidance strategy? Religion, Brain & Behaviour. Advance Online Publication. doi:  10.1080/2153599.x.2016.1249918.
  86. Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2014). The parasite-stress theory of values and sociality: Infectious disease, history, and human values worldwide. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thury, E. M., & Devinney, M. K. (2005). Introduction to mythology: Contemporary approaches to classical and world myths. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Turhcin, P. (2016). Ultra society: How 10,000 years of war made humans the greatest cooperators on earth. Chaplin, CT: Beresta Books.Google Scholar
  90. Watts, F., & Bretherton, R. (2017). “Religion” is complex and diverse. Religion, Brain & Behavior. Advance Online Publication. doi:  10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249930.
  91. Watts, J., Greenhill, S. J., Atkinson, Q. D., Currie, T. E., Bulbulia, J., & Gray, R. D. (2015). Broad supernatural punishment but not moralizing high gods precede the evolution of political complexity in Austronesia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 282. doi: 10.1098/respb.2014.2556
  92. Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2013). What predicts religiosity? A multidimensional analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 34, 440–445. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. White, C., Baimel, A., & Norenzayan, A. (2017). What are the causes and consequences of belief in Karma. Religion, Brain & Behaviour. Advance Online Publication. doi:  10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249921
  94. Whitehouse, H., Francois, P., & Turchin, P. (2015). The role of ritual in the evolution of social complexity: Five predictions and a drum roll. Cliodynamics, 6, 199–216.Google Scholar
  95. Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014). The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology, 55, 674–695. doi: 10.1086/678698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wilson, D. S., & Green, W. S. (2011). Evolutionary religious studies: A beginner’s guide. In E. Slingerland & M. Collard (Eds.), Creating consilience: Integrating the sciences and the humanities (pp. 225–242). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundations of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348. doi: 10.1086/522809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Wlodarski, R., & Pearce, E. (2016). The God allusion: Individual variation in agency detection, mentalizing and schizotypy and their association with religious beliefs and behaviours. Human Nature, 27, 160–172. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9256-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wood, B., & Baker, J. (2011). Evolution in the genus Homo. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 42, 47–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Feertz, A. W., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24, 1602–1605. doi: 10.1177/0956797612472910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of CriminologyVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Social and Cultural StudiesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations