Advertisement

The Light That Therefore I Give (to): Paleonymy and Animal Supplementarity in Clarice Lispector’s The Apple in the Dark

  • Rodolfo Piskorski
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature book series (PSAAL)

Abstract

In Of Grammatology, Derrida deconstructs the ideal/material dichotomy—especially in the speech/writing distinction—thereby locating a differential source to the distinction itself, which he calls arche-writing. Following his interest in “paleonymy,” the author proposes the paleonym arche-animality to understand animality in texts and the term zoogrammatology for a reading of zoopoetics, further arguing that zoopoetics must be approached with an eye toward paleonymy. Lispector’s The Apple in the Dark tells of the passage from nature to culture. Rather than a stage in such a journey, the animal is revealed as an arche-animal, an articulating supplement preceding and making possible the differentiation between evolutionary stages. Piskorski believes arche-animality is located in the poetics of light and dark prefigured in the title and in the novel’s concern with temporality and mortality.

Works Cited

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The Open: Man and Animal, trans. by Kevin Attel. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arrojo, Rosemary. 1999. Interpretation as Possessive Love: Hélène Cixous, Clarice Lispector, and the Ambivalence of Fidelity. In Postcolonial Translation: Theory and Practice, ed. Susan Bassnett and Harish Trivedi, 141–161. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bennington, Geoffrey. 1993. Derridabase. In Jacques Derrida, ed. Geoffrey Bennington and Jacques Derrida, 3–316. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Câmara Jr, Joaquim Mattoso. 1972. The Portuguese Language, trans. Anthony J. Naro. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cixous, Hélène. 1990. The Apple in the Dark: The Temptation of Understanding. In Reading with Clarice Lispector, ed. and trans. Verena Andermatt Conley, 60–97. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am, trans. David Wills and ed. Marie-Louise Mallet. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2016. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, introduction by Judith Butler. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fitz, Earl E. 2001. Sexuality and Being in the Poststructuralist Universe of Clarice Lispector: The Différance of Desire, 9. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kates, Joshua. 2005. Essential History: Jacques Derrida and the Development of Deconstruction. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lawlor, Leonard. 2007. This Is Not Sufficient: An Essay on Animality and Human Nature in Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lispector, Clarice. 1985. The Apple in the Dark, trans. Gregory Rabassa. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1999. A maçã no escuro. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.Google Scholar
  13. Mateus, Maria Helena, and Ernesto d’Andrade. 2000. The Phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Piskorski, Rodolfo. 2015. Of Zoogrammatology as a Positive Literary Theory. Journal of Literary Theory 9: 230–249.Google Scholar
  15. Rabassa, Gregory. 1985. Introduction to The Apple in the Dark, ed. Clarice Lispector, ix–xvi. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  16. Ravindranathan, Thangam, and Antoine Traisnel. 2016. What Gives (Donner le change). SubStance 45: 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rocco. 2014. A Maçã no Escuro. Accessed February 7, 2017. http://www.rocco.com.br/index.php/livro?cod=2213.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodolfo Piskorski
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations