Scientific Expertise and Engagement Experts
- 137 Downloads
This chapter offers a perspective that combats both cynical and idealist forms of public engagement. Engaging in a conversation with the “demarcation problem,” this chapter suggests that a rhetorical standpoint helps reframe the difference between expert and nonexpert discourse and alleviates the cynical mindset. This conceptual development invites us to reconsider the authority of publics to deliberate on technical and scientific issues. Following our discussion of demarcation, ending with the collision between Kuhn and Popper, we examine how demarcation is enacted in legal settings. Our final task in this chapter is to briefly review and synthesize some of the arguments we have made in previous chapters and suggest that a rhetorical sensibility can assist in producing more ecologically valid public engagement with science.
KeywordsPublic Engagement Events Rhetorical Sensibility Legal Setting Cynical Purposes Rhetorical Studies
- Edmond, Gary. 1998. Down by Science: Context and Commitment in the Lay Response to Incriminating Scientific Evidence During a Murder Trial. Public Understanding of Science 7 (2): 83–111.Google Scholar
- Epstein, Steven. 1995. Democracy, Expertise, and AIDS Treatment Activism. In Science, Technology, & Democracy, ed. Daniel Lee Kleinman, 15–32. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2006b. The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gross, Alan G. 2006. Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Hippocrates. On the Sacred Disease. The Internet Classics Archive. http://classics.mit.edu/Hippocrates/sacred.html.
- Irwin, Alan. 1995. Citizen Science: A Study of People and Expertise and Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, Thomas. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 50th anniversary ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lloyd, G.E.R. 1979. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lynch, Paul, and Nathaniel Rivers, eds. 2015. Thinking with Bruno Latour in Rhetoric and Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- Measles Cases and Outbreaks. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html.
- Mercer, David. 2016. Why Popper Can’t Resolve the Debate Over Global Warming: Problems with the Uses of Philosophy of Science in the Media and Public Framing of the Science of Global Warming. Public Understanding of Science: 1–14.Google Scholar
- Popper, Karl. 1992. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar