Skip to main content

Chapter 9 The Tricky Escape from Kizoti Court: Entanglement, Precarity and Ugandan Prison Staff

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prison Breaks

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology ((PSIPP))

Abstract

On the basis of an ethnographic study of governance and transition in Ugandan prisons, this chapter posits that escapes offer a particular pregnant entry point for the analysis of bureaucratic precarity, its reproduction and effects. I describe and unpack a particular escape incident, which I witnessed and later followed over a couple of years during fieldwork. The chapter introduces the court setting, where the escape took place and where it had a significant afterlife as the involved staff was subsequently charged. I describe the local practices of ‘linking’ and ‘lunching’ in the court to illustrate ever-present role of intermediation in Uganda’s do-it-yourself bureaucracy and the entanglement of staff and prisoner lives and roles. In conclusion, I consequently argue that the escape event shows how everyday life in this penal bureaucracy is at once volatile and violative and inherently precarious – not only for prisoners, but also for the staff.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is based on seven months of fieldwork in Ugandan prisons in 2009, 2010 and 2012. Observations of everyday prison practices and open-ended interviews with prisoners, staff and other prison stakeholders were conducted freely and extensively. Informants were selected based on their role and functions in the prison system and their involvement in specific cases that unfolded during fieldwork . All names are pseudonyms and ranks and places and dates of interviews and observations are not disclosed in order to protect the informants’ anonymity.

  2. 2.

    The court retains the discretion not to grant detained suspects bail, if it is considered unreasonable to release them, but the grounds have to be serious (tampering with the investigation, intimidating witnesses, former records of jumping bail, etc.).

References

  • Aguirre, C. (2005). The Criminals of Lima and Their Worlds: The Prison Experience, 1850–1935. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blundo, G., & Le Meur, P. Y. (2009). An Anthropology of Everyday Governance: Collective Service Delivery and Subject-Making. In G. Blundo & P. Le Meur (Eds.), The Governance of Daily Life in Africa. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, E. M. (2004). Emotion and Performance: Prison Officers and the Presentation of Self in Prisons. Punishment Society, 6(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Herdt, T., & Olivier de Sardan, J. P. (2015). Introduction: The Game of the Rules. In T. de Herdt & J. P. Olivier de Sardan (Eds.), Real Governance and Practical Norms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2015). Introduction: Governing Precarity. In D. Fassin (Ed.), At the Heart of the State: The Moral World of Institutions. London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, M. D. (1977). The Structure of Violence: Armed Forces as Social Systems. Beverly Hills/London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (2006). Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1961). Prison: The Organization of Dilemma. In D. Cressey (Ed.), The Prison. Studies in Institutional Organization and Change. New York (pp. 107–145). New York: Rhineholt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. J. (1997). The Illusion of Structure: A Critique of the Classical Model of Organization and the Discretionary Power of Correctional Officers. Criminal Justice Review, 22(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1991). Asylums. Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld, M. (1993). The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, K. (1988). Prison Officers and Their World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kewaza, J. M. (2016). Fighting Corruption in Uganda: Despite Small Gains, Citizens Pessimistic About Their Role. (Dispatch no 77). Afrobarometer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance, B. N., Osborn, E. L., et al. (2006). Intermediaries, Interpreters, and Clerks: African Employees in the Making of Colonial Africa. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2008). Why Prison Staff Culture Matters. In J. M. Byrne, D. Hummer, & F. S. Taxman (Eds.), The Culture of Prison Violence. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., & Price, D. (2001). The Prison Officer. Winchester: Waterside Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. (1995). Purity and Exile (Violence, Memory and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2015a). Managing with Escapes – Human Rights and the Practical Norms of Prison Governance in Uganda. In J.-P. Olivier-de-Sardan & T. D. Herdt (Eds.), Real Governance and Practical Norms in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Game of the Rules. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M. (2015b). Witnessing and Accessing Ugandan Prisons – Fieldwork Within a Post-Colonial Bureaucracy. In D. Drake, J. Sloan, & R. Earle (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Hampshire: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. M., Jefferson, A. M., et al. (2014). Sensing Prison Climates; Governance, Survival and Transition. Focaal, 68, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A., & Roitman, J. (1995). Figures of the Subject in Times of Crisis. Public Culture, 7(2), 323–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. M., Spooner, K., et al. (2016). The Effect of Prison Visitation on Reentry Success: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. F. (1987). Explaining the Present: Theoretical Dilemmas in Processual Ethnography. American Ethnologist, 14(4), 727–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. F. (1994). The Ethnography of the Present and the Analysis of Process. In R. Borofsky (Ed.), Assessing Cultural Anthropology (pp. 362–374). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. F. (2000). Law as Process. Oxford: James Currey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. (2013). Carceral Geography and the Spatialities of Prison Visiting: Visitation, Recidivism, and Hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(1), 174–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obbo, C. O. (1991). Women, Children and a ‘Living Wage’. In H. B. Hansen & M. Twaddle (Eds.), Changing Uganda: The Dilemmas of Structural Adjustment & Revolutionary Change. London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2008, December). Researching the Practical Norms of Real Governance in Africa. Africa, Power & Politics, 5, 1–24. http://www.institutions-africa.org/filestream/20090109-discussion-paper-5-researching-the-practical-norms-ofreal-governance-in-africa-jean-pierre-olivier-de-sardan-jan-2009

  • Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. (2009). State Bureaucracy and Governance in Francophone West Africa. In G. Blundo & P. Le Meur (Eds.), The Governance of Daily Life in Africa. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., & Bottoms, A. E. (2008). Legitimacy and Imprisonment Revisited: Some Notes on the Problem of Order Ten Years After. In J. M. Byrne, D. Hummer, & F. S. Taxman (Eds.), The Culture of Prison Violence. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M. (1958). The Society of Captives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. E. (1972). The English Prison Officer Since 1850 (A Study in Conflict). London: Routledge/Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1973). Bureaucracy. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), Form Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martin, T.M. (2018). Chapter 9 The Tricky Escape from Kizoti Court: Entanglement, Precarity and Ugandan Prison Staff. In: Martin, T., Chantraine, G. (eds) Prison Breaks. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64358-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64358-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64357-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64358-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics