Advertisement

The Investigation of Alkali Silica Reaction of Mortars Containing Borogypsum

  • Kursat Yildiz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

In this study, various properties and the alkali silica reaction (ASR) of mortars containing borogypsum were investigated. In the first stage a complete physical, chemical, mineralogical, molecular characterization of the borogypsum and cement were performed. In the second stage, the alkali silica reaction, mechanical and porosity properties of mortars, replacement 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4% borogypsum by weight were determined. According to experimental result, from a mineralogical perspective, the borogypsum was observed to have a sharp crystal structure and possess a mineralogical composition of calcite, colemanite and celestine. Looking from a molecular perspective, the similar OH, CaO, B–OH and H–OH bonds were displayed in the close wavenumbers. As the results of 14 days measurements were analyzed, the average maximum length extension was detected to be in the control mortar bars and at the detrimental zone from the ASR perspective. The average minimum length extension at the borogypsum with a additive rate of 3 and 4%, was observed to be at the control zone from ASR perspective. The lowest strength loss in mortars exposed to ASR effect occured in those with substitution level of 3% borogypsum. When the flexural strength of mortars exposed to ASR effect was examined, the increase in strength was observed for borogypsum with all substitution levels (1–4%). The maximum recovery concerning the minimum volume of mercury intruding the sample and vacancy rate was observed for the substitution level 3% borogypsum.

Keywords

Porogypsum Alkali silica reaction Mineralogical-mechanical property Porosimetry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Gazi University Scientific Researches Project Department with 07/2012-03 project code number. I thank to my university and to the valuable members for their supports.

References

  1. 1.
    Serpa D, Santos Silva A, de Brito J, Pontes J, Soares D (2013) ASR of mortars containing glass. Constr Build Mater 47:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neville AM (1995) Properties of concrete, 4th edn. Longman Group, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carles-Gibergues A, Hornain H (2008) La durabilité des bétons face aux réactions de gonflement endogène. In: Ollivier JP, Vichot A (eds) La durabilité des bétons: bases scientifiques pour la formulation de bétons durables dans leur environnement. Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Pons et Chaussées, Paris, pp 487–611 (in French)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fournier B, Bérubé MA, Thomas MDA, Smaoui N, Folliard KJ (2004) Evaluation and management of concrete structures affected by alkali–silica reaction—a review. MTL 2004–2011 (OP), Natural Resources Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godart B, Le Roux A (1995) Alcali-réaction dans le béton: mécanisme, pathologie et prévention. Techniques de l’Ingénieur, traité de Construction, C 2 252 (in French)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marzouk H, Langdon S (2003) The effect of alkali-aggregate reactivity on the mechanical properties of high and normal strength concrete. Cem Concr Compos 25:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poyet S, Sellier A, Capra B, Foray G, Torrenti JM, Cognon H et al (2007) Chemical modelling of alkali silica reaction: influence of the reactive aggregate size distribution. Mater Struct 40:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia-Diaz E, Riche J, Bulteel D, Vernet C (2006) Mechanism of damage for the alkalisilica reaction. Cem Concr Res 36:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    BenHaha M, Gallucci E, Guidoum A, Scrivener KL (2007) Relation of expansion due to alkali silica reaction to the degree of reaction measured by SEM image analysis. Cem Concr Res 37:1206–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giaccio G, Zerbino R, Ponce JM, Batic OR (2008) Mechanical behaviour of concretes damaged by alkali–silica reaction. Cem Concr Res 38:993–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roma SN, Ngo T, Mendis P, Mahmud HB (2011) High-strength rice husk ash concrete incorporing quarry dust as a partial substituten for sand. Constr Build Mater 25:3123–3130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okay O, Guclu H, Soner E (1985) Boron pollution in the Simav river, Turkey and various methods of boron removal. Water Res 19:857–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg S (1997) Reactions of boron with soil. Plant Soil 193:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Howe PD (1998) A review of boron effects in the environment. Biol Trace Elem Res 66:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boncukoglu R, Yılmaz TM, Kocakerim MM, Tosunoglu V (2002) Utilization of borogypsum as set retarder in Portland cement production. Cem Concr Res 32:471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elbeyli İF, Derun EM, Gülen J, Pişkin S (2003) Thermal analysis of borogypsum and its effects on the physical properties of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 33:1729–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erdoğan Y, Genç H, Demirbaş A (1992) Utilization of borogysum for cement. Cem Concr Res 22:841–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erdoğan Y, Demirbaş A, Genç H (1994) Partly-refined chemical by-product gypsum as cement additives. Cem Concr Res 24:601–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kavas T, Olgun A, Erdoğan Y (2005) Setting and hardening of borogypsum-Portland cement clinker-fly ash blends. Studies on effects of molasses on properties of mortar containing borogypsum. Cem Concr Res 35:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Demir D, Keleş G (2006) Radiation transmission of concrete including boron waste for 59.54 and 80.99 keV gamma rays. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 245:501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Demirbaş A, Karslıoğlu S (1995) The effect of boric acid sludges containing borogypsum on properties of cement. Cem Concr Res 25:1381–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demirbaş A (1996) Optimizing the physical and technological properties of cement additives in concrete mixtures. Cem Concr Res 26:1737–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Demirbaş A (1999) Recyciling of lithium from borogypsum by leaching with water and leaching kinetics. Resour Conserv Recycl 25:125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Demirbaş A, Yüksek H, Çakmak İ, Küçük MM, Cengiz M, Alkan M (2000) Recovery of boric acid from boronic wastes by leaching with water, carbon dioxide- or sulfur dioxide-saturated water and leaching kinetics. Resour Conserv Recycl 28:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alp I, Deveci H, Süngün YH, Yazici EY, Savaş M, Demirci S (2009) Leachable characteristics of arsenical borogypsum wastes and their potential use in cement production. Environ Sci Technol 43:6939–6943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tümen Y (2008) Effect of borogypsum on some properties of concrete. Masters thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Mustafa Kemal University (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sevim UK, Tümen Y (2013) Strength and fresh properties of borogypsum concrete. Constr Build Mater 48:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abell AB, Willis KL, Lange DA (1999) Mercury intrusion porosimetry and image analysis of cement-based materials. J Colloid Interface Sci 211:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khatib JM, Mangat PS (2003) Porosity of cement paste cured At 45 °C as a function of location relative to casting position. Cem Concr Res 25:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Caré S (2008) Effect of temperature on porosity and on chloride diffusion in cement pastes. Constr Build Mater 22(7):1560–1573MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Durmuş G, Arslan M (2010) Physical properties of cement mortars exposed to high temperature in various cooling conditions. J Fac Eng Arch Gazi Univ 25(3):541–548Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ASTM D (1984) 4404: Standard test method for determination of pore volume and pore volume distribution of soil and rock by mercury intrusion porosimetry. ASTM International, Aug 31Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    ASTM C 1260–07 (2010) Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (Mortar-Bar method), American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Demir I (2010) The mechanical properties of alkali–silica reactive mortars containing same amounts of silica fume and fly ash. J Fac Eng Arch Gazi Univ 25(4):749–758Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    TS EN 196-1 (2002) Methods of testing cement—part 1: determination of strength. Turkish Standards, Ankara (in Turkey)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    ASTM C 618 (2002) Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use as a mineral admixture in Portland cement concrete. Annual book of ASTM standards, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bayca SU (2013) Microwave radiation leaching of colemanite in sulfuric acid solutions. Sep Purif Technol 105:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koçak Y, Taşcı E, Kaya U (2013) The effect of using natural zeolite on the properties and hydration characteristics of blended cements. Constr Build Mater 47:720–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gomes CEM, Ferreira OP, Fernandes MR (2005) Influence of vinyl acetate–versatic vinylester copolymer on the microstructural characteristics of cement pastes. Mater Res 8(1):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Govin A, Peschard A, Guyonnet R (2006) Modification of cement hydration at early ages by natural and heated wood. Cem Concr Compos 28(1):12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cvetkovic J, Petrusevski VM, Soptrajanov B (1997) Reinvestigation of the water bending region in the spectra of gypsum-like compounds an FTIR study. J Mol Struct 408(409):463–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Frost RL, Xi Y, Scholz R, Belotti FM, Filho MC (2013) Infrared and Raman spectroscopic characterization of the borate mineral colemanite—CaB3O4(OH)3·H2O—implications for the molecular structure. J Mol Struct 1037:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technology Faculty, Civil Engineering DepartmentGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations