Advertisement

Kuznets’s Inverted U Hypothesis: The Relationship Between Economic Development and Ecological Footprint

  • Ceyda Erden Özsoy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)

Abstract

Sustainable development is defined as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. The concept of sustainable development contains both environmental sustainability and economic development. One simple way to assess sustainable development is to use the Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index (HDI). HDI measures a country’s average achievements in the areas of health, knowledge, and standard of living. The Ecological Footprint measures a country’s demand on nature and can be compared to available bio capacity. The HDI-Footprint, using simple indicators, prominently reveals how far removed the world is from achieving sustainable development. For all countries, the goal should be high human development and a low ecological footprint per capita. Environmental Kuznets Curve is located in the sustainable economic development literature puts forward that the inverse U shape relationship between the level of economic development and environmental degradation. In this study, the ecological footprints of countries are compared with the level of human development and the validity of Kuznets inverted U hypothesis being investigated. Measuring these two variables reveals that very few countries come close to achieving sustainable development.

Keywords

Economic development Human development index Ecological footprint Biological capacity Environmental kuznets curve 

References

  1. 1.
    Global Footprint Network (GFN) Sustainable Development. (http://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/sustainable-development/)
  2. 2.
    Shekhawat P (2013) UNDP uses a new human development eco footprint. http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/briefings/data/000258
  3. 3.
    World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Living planet report 2014. http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_living_planet_report_2014.pdf
  4. 4.
    Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Folke C, Holling CS, Janson B, Levin S, Maler K, Perrings C, Pimental D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecol Econ 15:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yandle B, Vijayaraghavan M, Bhattarai M (2002) The Environmental Kuznets Curve a primer. PERC Research Study 02-1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (1990) Human development report: overview. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Constanza R, Hart M, Poznerve S, Talberth J (2009) Beyond GDP—the need for new measures of progress, the Pardee Papers No. 4, January. Boston UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    UNDP, International Human Development Indicators. http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries
  13. 13.
    Moran DD, Wackernagel M, Kitzes JA, Goldfinger SH, Boutaud A (2008) Measuring sustainable development—nation by nation. Ecol Econ 64:470–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative ScienceAnadolu UniversityEskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations