Determination of Optimum Insulation Thickness on Different Wall Orientations in a Hot Climate

  • Erhan Arslan
  • Irfan Karagoz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 7)


In recent years, alternative and renewable energy sources have become essential and their use in this direction is increasing. When these energy sources are used, energy saving is also assessed. The main objective of this work is to determine the optimum insulation thickness according to the cooling requirement of a building in a hot climate. During the summer period different wall directions has been evaluated in Bursa. For the optimum insulation thickness in all wall directions, firstly total solar radiation, cooling transmission load and then cost analysis are performed. While solar radiation was calculated, factors such as declination angle, geometric factor, sun clock angle, altitude, ground reflectance and latitude angle were taken into account. The differences in cooling transmission load for insulated and uninsulated walls were observed. The heat transfer coefficient was determined according to inside and outside air-film thermal resistances and total thermal resistance of the wall without the insulation. In addition to these, the volumes, thicknesses, thermal conductivities and costs of the thermal insulation materials are also considered. When cost analysis is performed, PWF is calculated and also interest rate, inflation rate, cost of insulation materials and electrical cost were taken into account. Depending on the location of the building, insulation material which should be used for minimum cost and maximum efficiency and the required properties of this insulation material have been determined.


Optimum thickness of insulation Cooling transmission load Solar radiation Cost analysis 


  1. 1.
    Erkoc E, Senkal MC (2013) The state of energy in world and Turkey. Muhendis ve Makine 54:32–44Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaynaklı O, Sevcan O, Karamangil MI (2012) Determination of optimum thermal insulation thickness considering solar radiation and wall orientation. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 27:367–374Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Turkey 2016.
  4. 4.
    Fertelli A (2013) Determination of optimum insulation thickness for different building walls in Turkey. Transaction of Famena XXXVII-2, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey. ISSN 1333-1124 103-113Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oğulata TR (2012) Sectoral energy consumption in Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 6:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sezer FS (2005) Progress of thermal insulation systems in Turkey and exterior wall insulation systems in dwellings. J Uludağ Univ Fac Eng Archit 10:79–85Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Compulsory Standard Document TS 825 (1999) Thermal insulation rules in buildings. Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ucar A, Balo F (2009) Determination of the energy savings and the optimum insulation thickness in the four different insulated exterior walls. Renew Energy 35:88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ozel M, Pihtili K (2006) Optimum location and distribution of insulation layers on building walls with various orientations. Build Environ 42:3051–3059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaynakli O, Kaynakli F (2016) Determination of optimum thermal insulation thickness for external walls considering the heating, cooling and annual energy requirements. Uludağ Univ J Fac Eng 21:227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Külcü R (2015) Modelling of solar radiation reaching the earth to Isparta province. Süleyman Demirel Univ J Fac Agric 10(1):19–26Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozel M (2015) Determination of optimum insulation thickness based on cooling transmission load for building walls in a hot climate. Energy Convers Manag 66:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bolattürk A (2007) Optimum insulation thicknesses for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degree-hours in the warmest zone of Turkey. Build Environ 43:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turkish Statistical Institute, Republic of Turkey 2016.
  15. 15.
    Ozel M (2014) Effect of insulation location on dynamic heat-transfer characteristics of building external walls and optimization of insulation thickness. Energy Build 72:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kameni MN, Raminosoa RR, Mamiharijaona R, Rene T, Orosa JA, Elvis W, Meukam P (2015) Study of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for buildings in a wet and hot tropical climate: case of Cameroon. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:1192–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghedamsi R, Settou N, Saifi N, Dokkar B (2014) Contribution on buildings design with low consumption of energy incorporated PCMs. In: The international conference on technologies and materials for renewable energy, environment and sustainability, vol 50, pp 322–332Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daouas N (2011) A study on optimum insulation thickness in walls and energy savings in Tunisian buildings based on analytical calculation of cooling and heating transmission loads. Appl Energy 88:156–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    State Meteorological Station, Records for weather data, Turkey.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUludag UniversityBursaTurkey

Personalised recommendations