The Role of Cognitive Conflicts in Informational Environments: Conflicting Evidence from the Learning Sciences and Social Psychology?

Abstract

When people navigate through their informational environments, they often come across information that is discrepant from their knowledge or their attitudes, and consequently experience cognitive conflict. This chapter reviews findings and theories about cognitive conflicts from the learning sciences and from social psychology. While cognitive conflicts in the learning sciences (especially in the Piagetian and Vygotskyan tradition) are positively connoted as fundamental for learning, results in social psychology frequently suggest that people shy away from cognitive conflicts (e.g., by selectively preferring congenial information). Drawing from research about social media, this chapter provides evidence that people do not exhibit conflict avoidance, but actually seek out cognitive conflicts when contributing to wikis or responding to discussion posts. Apparently, providing an opportunity to change one’s environment is a strong driver to engage in cognitive conflict. The chapter concludes by suggesting how the conflicting evidence from the learning sciences and from social psychology might be reconciled.

Keywords

Cognitive conflicts Learning Selective exposure Persuasion Attitude accessibility Social media 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Development, 53, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brauer, M., Judd, C. M., & Gliner, M. D. (1995). The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1014–1029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buder, J., Buttliere, B., & Ballmann, A. (2015). Cognitive conflict in forum discussions on scientific topics. In H. Ogata et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computers in education (pp. 4–6). Jhongli City, Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.Google Scholar
  6. Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2016). Designing digital technologies for deeper learning. In M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2017). Informational environments: Cognitive, motivational-affective, and social-affective forays into the digital transformation. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 1–25). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Buder, J., & Rudat, A. (2014). Antecedents of replies and non-replies in online discussion forums: Evidence from a think-aloud study. In C.-C. Liu et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on computers in education (pp. 19–21). Jhongli City, Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.Google Scholar
  9. Buttliere, B., & Buder, J. (2017). Reading more vs. writing back: Situation affordances drive reactions to conflicting information on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desforges, D. M., Lord, C. G., Ramsey, S. L., Mason, J. A., Van Leeuwen, M. D., West, S. C., & Lepper, M. R. (1991). Effects of structured cooperative contact on changing negative attitudes toward stigmatized social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 531–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eagly, A. H., Chen, S., Chaiken, S., & Shaw-Barnes, K. (1999). The impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 64–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fazio, R. H., Chen, J. M., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude–behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 161–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  21. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 41–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graesser, A. C., Lippert, A. M., & Hampton, A. J. (2017). Successes and failures in building learning environments to promote deep learning: The value of conversational agents. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 273–298). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillmert, S., Groß, M., Schmidt-Hertha, B., & Weber, H. (2017). Informational environments and college student dropout. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 27–52). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tjosvold, D. (2000). Constructive controversy: The value of intellectual opposition. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 65–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bas.Google Scholar
  28. Judd, C. M., & Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kimmerle, J., Bientzle, M., Cress, U., Flemming, D., Greving, H., Grapendorf, J., … Sassenberg, K. (2017). Motivated processing of health-related information in online environments. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 75–96). New York, NY, Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2011). Using wikis for learning and knowledge building: Results of an experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 138–148.Google Scholar
  31. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and collective knowledge construction with social media: A process-oriented perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50, 120–137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-w. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleiman, T., & Hassin, R. R. (2013). When conflicts are good: Nonconscious goal conflicts reduce confirmatory thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 374–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mojzisch, A., Grouneva, L., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Biased evaluation of information during discussion: Disentangling the effects of preference consistency, social validation, and ownership of information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 946–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Wiki-Supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity. Computers and Education, 58, 1049–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mullen, B., & Hu, L.-T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 179–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. O’Donnell, A. M., & O’Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ritzer, G., Dean, P., & Jurgenson, N. (2012). The coming age of the prosumer. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naïve realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 563–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Effects of devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 253–283.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, K., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1981). Can conflict be constructive? Controversy versus concurrence seeking in learning groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Snyder, M., & Swann, W. B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tjosvold, D., & Johnson, D. W. (1977). Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmerman, B. J., & Blom, D. E. (1983). Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning. Developmental Review, 3, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zurstiege, G., Zipfel, S., Ort, A., Mack, I., Meitz, T. G. K., & Schäffeler, N. (2017). Managing obesity prevention using digital media—A double-sided approach. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 97–123). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM)TübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations