Advertisement

Reactive Virtual Forces for Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Swarm Exploration and Mapping

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10454)

Abstract

Exploration and mapping of unknown environments is a vibrant topic of research in the robotics community. Virtual potential fields have been used in prior research largely for spatial distribution, path planning and pattern formation. These fields involve the use of functions, often grounded in physics, to generate virtual potential fields that may be used to guide robots. It is the contention of this paper that a similar ‘virtual reactive forces’ method may be used for exploration and mapping, in combination with the already established occupancy grid method. This process involves the use of multiple virtual forces, based on the fundamental forces of nature, to guide robots in collision avoidance, exploration, and mapping. This paper compares the effectiveness of this method on heterogeneous and homogeneous swarms.

Keywords

Swarm Mapping Reactive virtual forces Heterogeneous Homogeneous Exploration Virtual potential fields 

References

  1. 1.
    Barnes, L., Fields, M., Valavanis, K.: Unmanned ground vehicle swarm formation control using potential fields. In: Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED 2007, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elfes, A.: Using occupancy grids for mobile robot perception and navigation. Computer 22(6), 46–57 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacoff, A.: Guide for evaluating, purchasing, and training with response robots using DHS-NIST-ASTM international standard test methods, March 2009Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khatib, O.: Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. Int. J. Robot. Res. 5(1), 90–98 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCook, C.J., Esposito, J.M.: Flocking for heterogeneous robot swarms: a military convoy scenario. In: 2007 Thirty-Ninth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, pp. 26–31. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mondada, F., Bonani, M., Raemy, X., Pugh, J., Cianci, C., Klaptocz, A., Magnenat, S., Zufferey, J.C., Floreano, D., Martinoli, A.: The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, vol. 1, pp. 59–65. IPCB: Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reif, J.H., Wang, H.: Social potential fields: a distributed behavioral control for autonomous robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 27(3), 171–194 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spears, W.M., Spears, D.F., Hamann, J.C., Heil, R.: Distributed, physics-based control of swarms of vehicles. Auton. Robots 17(2–3), 137–162 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiegand, R.P., Potter, M.A., Sofge, D.A., Spears, W.M.: A generalized graph-based method for engineering swarm solutions to multiagent problems. In: Runarsson, T.P., Beyer, H.-G., Burke, E., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Whitley, L.D., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4193, pp. 741–750. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi: 10.1007/11844297_75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, X.S., Roumeliotis, S.I.: Multi-robot slam with unknown initial correspondence: the robot rendezvous case. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1785–1792. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bristol Robotics LaboratoryUniversity of BristolBristolEngland
  2. 2.Bristol Robotics LaboratoryUniversity of the West of England (UWE)BristolEngland

Personalised recommendations