Advertisement

The Role of Women in Transboundary Water Dispute Resolution

  • Lynette de Silva
  • Jennifer C. Veilleux
  • Marian J. Neal
Chapter
Part of the Water Security in a New World book series (WSEC)

Abstract

Within decision-driven organisations that address water management and conflict mediation, there is much to be learnt about the role of women. At the provincial organisational levels, women’s participation in water management decision-making processes is more prevalent, while there is a gender disparity at the higher levels of the governing domain. Filling this void will bring greater perspective to water issues and challenges; bring recognition to a wider range of potential solutions; showcase women in multifaceted roles; and expand networks to better help address immediate, mid-term, and long-term concerns. The academic literature tends to categorise the role of women working in water, in terms of their contribution to community health; or their contribution to rural communities, in developing countries. Missing is the role of women as brokers of transformation within the water decision-making sphere. While many governments and nongovernment entities have emphasised women’s participation, efforts to achieve gender equality as a fundamental component emerging out of conflict towards peace and security, needs to be applied with conviction. Until a gendered approach to water management is applied as a matter of principle; and the gender gap in economics, politics, property rights, and cultural roles are closed, the valuable voice of at least half of the global population remains silent or underutilised in the process of conflict dispute when it comes to the world’s more than 300 transboundary freshwater shared resources.

Keywords

Conflict mediation Water management Post-conflict reconstruction Conflict dispute Transboundary freshwater resources 

Bibliography

  1. Amnesty International (2015) Circles of Hell: domestic, public and state violence against women in Egypt. Report. http://www.amnestyusa.org/sites/default/files/mde_120042015.pdf. Accessed 17 Aug 2016
  2. Araujo S (2008) Million cistern project provides life-giving water in Brazil. Grassroots International: Funding Global Movements for social change. http://www.grassrootsonline.org/news/articles/million-cistern-project-provides-life-giving-water-brazil. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  3. Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2016
  4. Callesen G (2006) The International Socialist Women’s Conference. https://studycircle.wikispaces.com/file/view/14023,+Calleson,+The+International+Socialist+Women’s+Conference,+2006.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2016
  5. Canadian International Development Agency (2012) Women’s economic empowerment: a CESO perspective. Canadian Executive Service Organization. http://www.ceso-saco.com/getattachment/647831f8-939b-44ee-b1a1-31acc9969ed7/Women-s-Economic-Empowerment--A-CESO-Perspective.aspx. Accessed 2 Jan 2016
  6. Cosens B, de Silva L, Sowards AM (2012) Introduction to Parts I, II, and III. In: Cosens B (ed) Transboundary river governance in the face of uncertainty: the Columbia River Treaty – a project of the universities consortium on Columbia River Governance. Oregon State University Press, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  7. de Moraes A (2015) Advances and setbacks in women’s participation in water management in Brazil Part 1. In: Buechler S, Hanson AM (eds) A political ecology of women, water, and global environmental change. Routledge Publishing, Abingdon-on-Thames, pp 77–96Google Scholar
  8. De Stefano L, Edwards P, de Silva L, Wolf AT (2010) Tracking cooperation and conflict in international basins: historic and recent trends. Water Policy 12(6):871–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delli JP, Wolf AT (2009) Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Earle A, Bazilli S (2013) A gendered critique of transboundary water management. Fem Rev 103:99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frayssinet F (2010) Brazilian communities find ways to live in semiarid environment. http://www.ipsnews.net/2010/10/brazilian-communities-find-ways-to-live-in-semiarid-environment/. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  12. Frey FW (1993) The political context of conflict and cooperation over international river basin. Water Int 18(1):54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. From Web of Science, owned by Clarivate Analytics. Accessed July 18, 2016 through Florida International University. https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=2F5GlzTHXxXnengjxCX&preferencesSaved=
  14. Ghazzawi R, Mohammad A, Ramadan O (2015) Peacebuilding defines our future now: a study of women’s peace activism in Syria. Badael Foundation, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  15. Global Water Partnership (2015) GWP highlights gender at 7th World Water Forum. http://www.gwp.org/en/gwp-in-action/News-and-Activities/GWP-Highlights-Gender-at-7th-World-Water-Forum/. Accessed 10 Mar 2016
  16. Government of Canada (2013) Women’s economic empowerment: guidance note. Government of Canada: Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development. http://www.enterprise-development.org/wp-content/uploads/Womens_Economic_Empowerment.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2016
  17. Greene M, Levack A (2010) Synchronizing gender strategies: a cooperative model for improving reproductive health and transforming gender relations http://www.prb.org/igwg_media/synchronizing-gender-strategies.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  18. Güntner A, Bronstert A (2003) Large-scale hydrological modeling in the semiarid northeast of Brazil: aspects of model sensitivity and uncertainty. Hydrol Mediterranean Semiarid Regions 278:43–48Google Scholar
  19. GWI (2015) The top 20 most powerful women in water. Global Water Intelligence Magazine. http://www.xpvwaterpartners.com/wp content/uploads/2015/11/Top-20-Women-in-Water.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2016Google Scholar
  20. GWP (2000) Integrated water resources management, TAC background papers no. 4. Global Water Partnership, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  21. GWP-TEC (2006) Gender mainstreaming: an essential component of sustainable water management. Global Water Partnership, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  22. Haughney C, Kaufman L (2014, October 6) The rise of conferences on women’s empowerment. The New York Times, 3Google Scholar
  23. Jain A (2014) Making the top 100: where are the women water leaders in Asia and the Pacific?. http://blogs.adb.org/blog/making-top-100-where-are-women-water-leaders-asia-and-pacific. Accessed 11 Mar 2016
  24. Javan M (2015) Africa: South Africa aims for more women in water sector. In AllAfrica Online Publication through SouthAfrica.info (Johannesburg). http://allafrica.com/stories/201509021115.html. Accessed 2 Sept 2015
  25. Lagarde C (2014) The economic power of women’s empowerment. https://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2014/091214.htm. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  26. Miranda, R. (2005). Impact of women’s participation and leadership on outcomes. Prepared for the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW), Expert Group Meeting on “Equal participation of women and men in decision-making processes, with particular emphasis on political participation and leadership,” 24 to 27 October 2005, Addis AbabaGoogle Scholar
  27. Mokonyane N (2015) Minister Nomvula Mokonyane: national women in water consultative conference. http://www.gov.za/speeches/minister-nomvula-mokonyane-national-women-water-consultative-conference-31-aug-2015-0000. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  28. National Women’s History Museum (2007) The rights of women: the Suffrage movement and its leaders – The Seneca falls convention and the early Suffrage movement. https://www.nwhm.org/online-exhibits/rightsforwomen/SenecaFalls.html. Accessed Mar 2016
  29. Pradhan R, Meinzen-Dick RS (2010) Which rights are right? Water rights, culture, and underlying values. In: Brown PG, Schmidt JJ (eds) Water ethics: foundational readings for students and professionals. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 39–58Google Scholar
  30. Ramsbotham O, Miall H, Woodhouse T (2011) Contemporary conflict resolution: the prevention, management and transformation of deadly conflicts, 3rd edn. Polity, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Ray I (2007) Women, water, and development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:421–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robbins P (2004) Political ecology. Blackwell Publishing, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  33. Sadoff CW, Grey D (2002) Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy 4(2002):389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sida (2015) Women, peace and security. Gender Toolbox Brief March 2015. http://www.sida.se/contentassets/3a820dbd152f4fca98bacde8a8101e15/gender-tool-mainstreaming.pdf. Accessed Mar 2016
  35. Smiljanić J, Chatterjee A, Kauppinen T, Mitrović Dankulov M (2016) A theoretical model for the associative nature of conference participation. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0148528. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148528. Editors, Matjaz Perc, University of Maribor, SLOVENIA. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148528. Accessed 25 July 2016
  36. Takei M (2012) She-Q: why women should mentor men and change the world. Praeger Publishers, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  37. The Dag Hammarskjöld Lecture (2012) Women’s participation in the sustainable world. Speech given on 6 May 2013. Former President of the Republic of FinlandGoogle Scholar
  38. The Economist (2012) Economic contribution of women. http://www.economist.com/news/economi-and-financial-indicators/21564857. Accessed 13 Mar 2016
  39. Ty R (2014) The inclusion and mainstreaming of the active role of women in peacemaking, conflict resolution, reconciliation, peacebuilding, recovery, and reconstruction: lessons learned and best practices from the field. Proceedings of The Palestinian Women’s Research and Documentation Centre Conference, “The Role of Women in Peacebuilding and Reconstruction,” December 9–10, 2014. Sponsored by the State of Palestine Ministry of Women’s Affairs and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Office (UNESCO). Funded by The Representative Office of Norway to the Palestinian AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  40. UN (2002) Chapter IV: Strategic Objectives and actions, Beijing platform for action. Chapter IV. A women and poverty. UN Documents: Gathering a body of global agreements. http://www.un-documents.net/bpa-4-a.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
  41. UNIFEM (2010) Women’s participation in peace negotiations: connections between presence and influence. http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/WomensParticipationInPeaceNegotiations_UNIFEM2010.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2016
  42. UN Women (2015) Preventing conflict, transforming justice, securing the peace: A global study on the implementation of united nations security council resolution 1325. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/UNW-GLOBAL-STUDY-1325-2015.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2016
  43. Value of Water Coalition (2015) Lessons from the top women leaders in water. http://thevalueofwater.org/content/lessons-top-women-leaders-water. Accessed 11 Mar 2016
  44. Wängnerud L (2009) Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Ann Rev Polit Sci 12:51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Web of Science (n.d.) Owned by Clarivate analytics. https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=2F5GlzTHXxXnengjxCX&preferencesSaved. Accessed 18 July 2016 through Florida International University
  46. Wolf A (ed) (2010) Sharing water, sharing benefits: working towards effective transboundary water resources management. A Graduate/Professional Skills-Building Workbook. UNESCO, The World Bank, and Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  47. Women for Water Partnership (2015) Outcomes, recommendations and ideas for implementation. From the pre-women conference “Gender Equity for a Water-Secure Future”, 10–11 April 2015, Gyeongju, Gyeongbuk, Korea, preceding the 7th World Water Forum http://www.womenforwater.org/uploads/7/7/5/1/77516286/recommendations-ideas-implementation-def20150412.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2016
  48. World Water Forum (2015) Gender equity for a water-secure future. In programs of the forum, coordinated by women for water partnership. http://eng.worldwaterforum7.org/program/program.asp?program_seq=666#0. Accessed 12 Mar 2016
  49. Yaari E, Neal (Patrick) MJ, Shubber Z (2015) Governance structures for transboundary water management in the Jordan Basin. Stockholm International Water Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  50. Yerian S, Hennink M, Greene L, Kiptugen D, Jared BJ, Freeman M (2014) The role of women in water management and conflict resolution in Marsabit. Kenya Environ Manage:1320–1330Google Scholar
  51. Yoffe S, Wolf AT, Giordano M (2003) Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources: indicators of basins at risk. J Am Water Resour Assoc 39(5):1109–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynette de Silva
    • 1
  • Jennifer C. Veilleux
    • 2
  • Marian J. Neal
    • 3
  1. 1.Program in Water Conflict Management and Transformation, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Global Water Security Forum, Steven J. Green School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA)Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Stockholm International Water InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations