Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: Definition, Concepts and Impact on Firm Value Creation

Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)


In recent decades, the developments of new media have revolutionized individuals’ behaviors tremendously. Mobile devices, in particular, have developed an ‘always and everywhere online’ mentality. But what comes next? Recent developments emphasize the rise of a new technology that is termed ‘Wearable Augmented Reality Devices’, where Augmented Reality Smart Glasses (such as Microsoft HoloLens or Google Glass) represent prominent examples. These technologies offer huge innovation potential for companies and societies, which are discussed in this article. By doing so, this paper provides managers and researchers an applied description of the technology and a discussion of how it differs from existing mobile and augmented reality technologies. Finally, insights are given into how these technologies may increase firm value and further change the behaviors of consumers and adopters.


Augmented reality smart glasses ARSGs Mixed reality Head mounted display Definitions Firm value Future research 


  1. Albrecht, U. V., von Jan, U., Kuebler, J., Zoeller, C., Lacher, M., Muensterer, O. J., & Hagemeier, L. (2014). Google Glass for Documentation of Medical Findings: Evaluation in Forensic Medicine. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(2).Google Scholar
  2. Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrie, J. (2014). Google Glass Is Now Banned From All US Movie Theaters. Business Insider Retrieved from http:// (6/09/2015).
  4. Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 183–194.Google Scholar
  5. Berneburg, A. (2007). Interactive 3D Simulations in Measuring Consumer Preferences: Friend or Foe to Test Results? Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brem, A., & Viardot, É. (2015). Adoption of Innovation: Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation (pp. 1–10). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenmann, T., Barley, L. & Kind, L. (2014). Google Glass, Harvard Business School Case 814–102.Google Scholar
  9. Felix, R. (2012). Brand communities for mainstream brands: the example of the Yamaha R1 brand community. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(3), 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felix, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., & Hinsch, C. (2017). Elements of strategic social media marketing: A holistic framework. Journal of Business Research, 70, 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fodor, M., & Brem, A. (2015). Do Privacy Concerns Matter for Millennials? Results from an Empirical Analysis of Location-Based Services Adoption in Germany. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(12), 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hein, D. W., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses and knowledge management: A conceptual framework for enterprise social networks. In Enterprise social networks (pp. 83–109). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  14. Javornik, A. (2016a). ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9–10), 987–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Javornik, A. (2016c). What Marketers Need to Know about Augmented Reality, Harvard Business Review,
  16. Javornik, A., Rogers, Y., Moutinho, A. M., & Freeman, R. (2016). Revealing the Shopper Experience of Using a” Magic Mirror” Augmented Reality Make-Up Application. In Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vol. 2016, pp. 871–882). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).Google Scholar
  17. Jung, T., Chung, N., & Leue, M. C. (2015). The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: The case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Management, 49, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leue, M. C., Jung, T., & tom Dieck, D. (2015). Google glass augmented reality: Generic learning outcomes for art galleries. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015 (pp. 463–476). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. McNaney, R., Vines, J., Roggen, D., Balaam, M., Zhang, P., Poliakov, I., & Olivier, P. (2014). Exploring the Acceptability of Google Glass as an Everyday Assistive Device for People with Parkinson’s. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2551–2554). ACM.Google Scholar
  24. Muniz, A. M., & O’guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of consumer research, 27(4), 412–432.Google Scholar
  25. Muensterer, O. J., Lacher, M., Zoeller, C., Bronstein, M., & Kübler, J. (2014). Google Glass in Pediatric Surgery: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Surgery, 12(4), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pantano, E., Rese, A., & Baier, D. (2017). Enhancing the online decision-making process by using augmented reality: A two country comparison of youth markets. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 81–95.Google Scholar
  27. Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rauschnabel, P. A., Brem, A., & Ivens, B. S. (2015a). Who will buy Smart Glasses? Empirical Results of two Pre-market-entry Studies on the Role of Personality in Individual Awareness and Intended Adoption of Google Glass Wearables. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rauschnabel, P. A., Brem, A., & Ro, Y. (2015b). Augmented reality smart glasses: definition, conceptual insights, and managerial importance. Working paper, The University of Michigan-Dearborn, ResearchGate.Google Scholar
  30. Stockinger, H. (2016). The future of augmented reality-an Open Delphi study on technology acceptance. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(1), 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Technavio (2015). Global Smart Glasses Market for Augmented Reality 2015–2019, Elmhurst, IL.Google Scholar
  32. Tomiuc, A. (2014). Navigating culture. Enhancing visitor museum experience through mobile technologies. From smartphone to google glass. Journal of Media Research, 7(3), 33–47.Google Scholar
  33. tom Dieck, M. C., & Jung, T. (2015). A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism. Current Issues in Tourism, 1–21.Google Scholar
  34. Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the Internet Changing Social Life? It seems the more Things Change, the more they Stay the Same. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of BusinessUniversity of Michigan-DearbornDearbornUSA
  2. 2.School of Business and EconomicsFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations