Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 857 Accesses

Abstract

How do people refer to places in their environment, and to what extent do the underlying spatial concepts correspond to officially defined regions? We exemplify some types of evidence that may help to determine local vernacular place concepts. The output of latent semantic analysis (LSA) on a web-scraped text corpus was compared with mapping and linguistic data from a pilot experiment, to see how localities within the same geographic area tended to be clustered, how far the spatial geography is similarly distorted, and how far participants’ verbal protocols revealed a tendency to group places together (and how). Finally, we list some challenges for future triangulation of such data sources, in deriving vernacular place data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    LSA was adopted here because of Louwerse’s previous success, and because other methods tend to presume groupings of points exist from the start; we did not.

References

  • Barsalou LW (1985) Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 11:629–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies C (2009) Are places concepts? Familarity and expertise effects in neighborhood cognition. In: Wrac’h A Spatial information theory: 9th international conference COSIT 2009, vol. 5756, France, 21–25 Sep 2009. LNCS. Springer, Berlin, pp 36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies C (2013) Reading geography between the lines: extracting local place knowledge from text. In: Spatial information theory: 11th international conference COSIT 2013, vol 8116, Scarborough, UK, 2–6 Sep 2013, Proceedings. LNCS. Springer, Berlin pp 320–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman A (2009) The role of categories and spatial cuing in global-scale location estimates. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35(1):94–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao S, Janowicz K, Montello DR, Hu Y, Yang J-A, McKenzie G, Yan B (2017) A data-synthesis-driven method for detecting and extracting vague cognitive regions. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 31(6):1245–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn U, Ramscar M (2001) Similarity and categorization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton JA (2007) Typicality, graded membership and vagueness. Cognitive Science 31:355–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirtle SC, Jonides J (1985) Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Mem Cogn 13:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer TK, McNamara DS, Dennis S, Kintsch W (2007) Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdale MW (1998) Modeling memory for absolute location. Psychol Rev 105(2):351–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd R, Heivly C (1987) Systematic distortions in urban cognitive maps. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77(2):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louwerse MM, Zwaan RA (2009) Language encodes geographic space. Cogn Sci 33:51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meilinger T, Riecke BE, BĂĽlthoff HH (2014) Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. Quart J Exp Psychol 67(3):542–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello D (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank AU, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS, Proceedings of COSIT ’93. Springer, Berlin, pp 312–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (2003) Regions in geography: Process and content. In: Duckham M, Goodchild MF, Worboys MF (eds) Foundations of geographic information science. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 173–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe N, Huttenlocher J, Sandberg E, Lie E, Johnson S (1999) What do misestimations and asymmetries in spatial judgment indicate about spatial representation? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(4):986–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrink T, Wiener J (2009) The verbalization of multiple strategies in a variant of the traveling salesperson problem. Cogn Process 10(2):143–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W (1994) Bidimensional regression. Geogr Anal 26:186–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B (1981) Distortions in memory for maps. Cogn Psychol 13:407–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Davies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Davies, C., Tenbrink, T. (2018). Place as Location Categories: Learning from Language. In: Fogliaroni, P., Ballatore, A., Clementini, E. (eds) Proceedings of Workshops and Posters at the 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2017). COSIT 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63946-8_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics