Authoritarian Continuity or Democratic Change? Assessing the Democratic Quality of South Korea’s North Korea Policy-Making Process

  • Eric J. Ballbach
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)


The Republic of Korea’s (ROK or South Korea) relationship to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea) has long been, and continues to be, hotly debated in both political and academic discourse in South Korea and beyond. However, most studies dealing with the subject primarily focus on the general alignment of the North Korea policies of the various South Korean administrations, assess the relative success of these policies in view of the underlying strategy (engagement vs. containment), or analyze particular issues within the ROK’s relationship to North Korea. While these issues are without doubt important, several aspects of South Korea’s relations with the North have thus far been largely excluded from analysis. This chapter addresses one of those aspects, namely the continuities and changes in South Korea’s policy-making structure vis-à-vis the DPRK. Specifically, the study addresses the question of how democratic these policy-making processes have been since South Korea’s formal democratization in 1987. To answer this, the chapter first touches upon the nexus between national division and democratization. The following section then provides a snapshot of the continuities and changes in South Korea’s (North Korea) policy-making structure during the Sixth Republic. Building on these elaborations, the subsequent section then identifies the main actors and institutions involved in this policy-making process, discussing the role of the president and his personal aides, the advisory organs such as the National Security Council, the Ministry of Unification, and the National Intelligence Service. This debate provides a prerequisite for a more comprehensive discussion of the main shortcomings that are to be observed in the ROK’s decision-making process on North Korea. The main argument of the chapter is fairly simple: while South Korea has certainly entered the stage of mature democracy, the ROK’s policy-making on North Korea still does not abide by a democratic process. While different actors and institutions have been centrally involved in this process, the policy-making structure has remained highly closed, personalized, and informal, thus constituting a serious deficit in democratic quality.


  1. Ballbach, E. J. (2016). Resolving the Kaesong Paradox (Unpublished Manuscript).Google Scholar
  2. Bechtol, B. E. (2007). Red Rouge: The Persistent Challenge of North Korea. Washington: Potomac.Google Scholar
  3. Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2004). The Quality of Democracy, Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law (Stanford Institute on International Studies, CDDRL Working Papers, Vol. 20).Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2003). Policy Formulation and Implementation. Available at: Accessed 24 Oct 2015.
  5. Helgesen, G. (2013). Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Kil, J. W. (1994). South Korea’s Policy Making Process on North Korea’s Nuclear Issue: A Random Note. Nautilus Institute. Available at: Accessed 29 Apr 2015.
  7. Lee, J. S. (2000). Hyŏndae pukhan-ŭi ihae [Understanding Contemporary North Korea]. Seoul: Yoksapip’yŏngsa.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, S. Y. (2010). Engaging North Korea: The Clouded Legacy of South Korea’s Sunshine Policy. Asian Outlook, No. 2. Available at: Accessed 24 Oct 2015.
  9. Levin, N. D., & Han, Y. S. (2002). Sunshine in Korea: The South Korean Debate Over Policies Toward North Korea. Santa Monica: RAND. Available at: Accessed 29 Apr 2015.
  10. Paik, N. C. (2013). South Korean Democracy and Korea’s Division System. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 14(11), 156–169.Google Scholar
  11. Park, M. L. (1997). Pundanjilso-ŭi kujo-wa pyŏnhwa: chŏktae-wa ŭijon-ŭi taessangkwan’gyedonghak [Structure and Change of Division: Interface Dynamics of Hostility and Dependence]. Kukkajŏllyak, 3(1), 41–97.Google Scholar
  12. Park, J. C. (2008). Lee Myung-Bak Administration’s North Korea Policy: Challenges and Tasks. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 22(2), 39–61.Google Scholar
  13. Park, H. K., & Bae, J. Y. (2001). Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy in South Korea. Journal of Social Science, 19, 193–216.Google Scholar
  14. Schoff, J. L. & Choi, H. J. (2008, April). Reform Locally, Act Globally? Crisis Management Trends in Korea. KEI Academic Paper Series 3:3.Google Scholar
  15. Snyder, S. (2010). Changes in Seoul’s North Korean Policy and Implications for Pyongyang’s Inter-Korean Diplomacy (Draft Paper). Available at: Accessed 30 Apr 2015.
  16. Son, K. Y. (2006). South Korean Engagement Policies and North Korea: Identities, Norms and the Sunshine Policy. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Suh, J. J. (2015). Korea’s Democracy After the Cheonan Incident: The Military, the State, and Civil Society Under the Division System. Asian Perspective, 39, 171–193.Google Scholar
  18. Yoon, S. H. (1995). Decision-Making Structure and the Policy Process in South Korea’s Nordpolitik. Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, 14(3), 89–111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric J. Ballbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Korean StudiesFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations