Skip to main content

Introduction: The Quality of Democracy in Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Quality of Democracy in Korea

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific ((CSAP))

Abstract

This introduction offers a synopsis of the overall rationale behind the book and its individual chapters as well as an overarching argument about the quality of democracy in South Korea and more generally. It starts by outlining the course of events in Korea following the transition to formal democracy in 1987. Subsequently, it discusses some of the literature that most directly addresses recent developments in Korea and then turns to the perspective of democratic quality. After briefly discussing the relative strengths and weaknesses of various indices for assessing the quality of democracy, the chapter briefly introduces the basic idea of Larry Diamond and Leonardo Morlino’s approach to the quality of democracy, focusing on the eight dimensions of democratic quality as a starting point for the discussions in the remainder of the book. The chapter closes with an outline of the book, providing a short summary of the themes of each of the ten chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The subunits of the former are “autonomy (chayul)” and “competition (kyŏngjaeng),” while the subunits of the latter are “pluralization (tawŏnhwa)” and “solidarity (yŏndae).”

References

  • Cho, W. B. (2014). ‘Choŭn minjujuŭi’ chip’yo: minjujuŭi chir-ŭi kyŏnghŏm-jŏk ch’ŭkchŏng [‘Good Democracy’ Index: A Measurement of Democratic Quality]. Pigyominjujuŭiyŏn’gu, 10(1), 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. J. (2012). Democracy After Democratization: The Korean Experience. Stanford: Asia Pacific Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consortium for the Asian Democracy Index. (2012). The Asian Democracy Index: A Guide. Asian Democracy Review, 1, 36–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M., Lindberg, S., Skaaning, S.-E., & Teorell, J. (2016). Measuring High Level Democratic Principles Using the V-Dem Data. International Political Science Review, 37(4), 580–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Kim, B. K. (2000). Consolidating Democracy in South Korea. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2004). The Quality of Democracy. An Overview. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (Eds.). (2005). Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Plattner, M. F. (2013). Democracy in East Asia. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., & Shin, G. W. (2014). New Challenges for Maturing Democracies in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, G. M. D., Ku, J. H., & Jackson, K. D. (2014). Incomplete Democracies in the Asia-Pacific: Evidence from Indonesia, Korea, the Philippines, and Thailand. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, B., Morlino, L., & Pelizzo, R. (2011). The Quality of Democracy in Asia-Pacific: Issues and Findings. International Political Science Review, 32(5), 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The Danger of Deconsolidation. The Democratic Disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahm, C. B. (2008). South Korea’s Miraculous Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 19(3), 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation on Higher Education, 18(1), 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. S. (Ed.). (2003). Korea’s Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H. (2012). ‘Contentious Democracy’ in South Korea. An Active Civil Society and Ineffectual Political Parties. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8(2), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S. I., Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., & Teorell, J. (2014). V-Dem: A New Way to Measure Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Towards Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2003). What Is a ‘Good’ Democracy? Theory and the Case of Italy. South European Society and Politics, 8(3), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2010). The Two ‘Rules of Law’ Between Transition to and Quality of Democracy. In L. Morlino & G. Palombella (Eds.), Rule of Law and Democracy. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mosler, H. B. (2015). The Deterioration of South Korean Democracy. In B. Howe (Ed.), Democratic Governance in Northeast Asia – A Human-Centred Approach to Evaluating Democracy (pp. 25–50). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (2004). Why the Rule of Law Matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (2005). Democracia y Estado de derecho. Nexos: Sociedad, Ciencia, Literatura, 27(325), 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. M. (2014). South Korea’s Disaffected Democracy. In E. S. K. Fung & S. Drakely (Eds.), Democracy in Eastern Asia: Issues, Problems and Challenges in a Region of Diversity (pp. 38–59). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rehbinder, M. (2009). Rechtssoziologie. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (2010). Twenty-Five Years, Fifteen Findings. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (2015). Crisis and Transition, But Not Decline. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, H. K. (2012). Taehanminguk hŏnbŏp-ŭi t’anseang [The Birth of South Korea’s Constitution]. Paju: Changbi Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. H. (2011). Munjujuŭi chir-ŭi kaenyŏmhwa-wa p’yŏngga: tach’awŏn-jŏk chŏpkŭn [The Quality of Democracy and Its Conceptualization and Assessment: A Multidimensional Approach]. Sahoegwahakyŏn’gu (Kyungsung University), 27(1), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mosler, H.B., Lee, EJ., Kim, HJ. (2018). Introduction: The Quality of Democracy in Korea. In: Mosler, H., Lee, EJ., Kim, HJ. (eds) The Quality of Democracy in Korea. Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63919-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics