Advertisement

Approaches to Enhancing Student Learning: A Quality-Assured, Creative and Performing-Arts Model

  • Prem Ramburuth
  • Melissa Laird
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities book series (PSBAH)

Abstract

Arts-based approaches to learning and teaching in higher education have a distinct capacity to provide students with authentic learning opportunities. This chapter, centred in the performing arts, demonstrates how an institutional approach to learning influences and embeds collaborative and interdisciplinary learning in the area of live theatrical production. It also demonstrates how students’ reveal curiosity and empathy by engaging with the work of others through a unique community of creative-arts practice, at the same time attaining disciplinary expertise and the aggregated knowledge that leads to a collective dramatic performance. The authors present a framework in which learning in the creative and performing arts is strengthened by the inclusion of higher education and discipline standards to ensure quality in student learning and comparative standing. Application of the framework is demonstrated through a case study highlighting creative teaching methods used in live dramatic performances at one of Australia’s leading performing arts institutes.

Keywords

Collaborative learning Practice-informed research Interdisciplinary practice Quality assured arts-based learning NIDA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Director/CEO Kate Cherry, Deputy Director/CEO Michael Scott-Mitchell, Head of MFA (Writing for Performance) and author of ‘The Olympians’ Stephen Sewell, and John Bashford, Director Undergraduate Studies for their support of NIDA as a source for this chapter.

References

  1. Almqvist, Cecilia, John Vinge, Lauri Väkevä, and Olle Zandén. 2016. Assessment as Learning in Music Education: The Risk of “criteria compliance” Replacing “learning” in the Scandinavian Countries. Research Studies in Music Education 1–16. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1321103X16676649. Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
  2. Bashford, John. 2017. Meeting with Director Learning and Teaching. Sydney, April 25.Google Scholar
  3. Carey, Gemma. 2010. Performance of Learning? Reflections on Pedagogical Practices within the Conservatoire. Presented at the 18th International Seminar of the Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  4. Crisp, Geoffrey. 2012. Integrative Assessment: Reframing Assessment Practice for Current and Future Learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37: 33–43. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2010.494234. Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
  5. Dewey, John. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn Books, G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Communication and the Arts. 2017. Performing Arts Training Bodies. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  7. Forsyth, Graham. 2013. The COFA Experience: Assessment Reform and Review. In Improving Assessment in Higher Education: A Whole-of-Institution Approach, ed. Richard Henry, Stephen Marshall, and Prem Ramburuth, 147–165. Sydney: NewSouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Gregory, Sean. 2010. Collaborative Approaches: Putting Colour in a Grey Area. International Journal of Community Music 3: 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardin, Russell. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, Jillian, and Luke Jaaniste. 2009. Content, Structure and Orientations of the Practice-Led Exegesis. Presented at the Art.Media.Design: Writing Intersections Conference, Hawthorn, Melbourne, 18–19 November.Google Scholar
  11. Harwood, Eve. 2007. Artists in the Academy: Curriculum and Instruction. In International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, ed. Liora Bresler, 313–325. Illinois: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  13. Kolb, David. 2015. Experiential Learning Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  14. Laird, Melissa. 2013. Remnant and Reliquary: Fragmentary Traces Reconciled as Object and Knowledge. In Doctoral Writing in the Creative and Performing Arts, ed. Louise Ravelli, Brian Paltridge, and Sue Starfield, 115–134. Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Laird, William Terris. 1963. The Use of the Textbook. MAed diss., University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  16. Leong, Samuel. 2017. Hong Kong Academy for the Performing Arts Benchmarking Exercise. In NIDA-HPAPA Benchmarking Report. Sydney: NIDA.Google Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: North Weston University Press.Google Scholar
  18. National Institute of Dramatic Art. 2017a. Contextualising Practice. In MFA Subject Outline. Sydney: NIDA.Google Scholar
  19. National Institute of Dramatic Art. 2017b. Vision Statement. Sydney: NIDA.Google Scholar
  20. O’Loughlin, Marjorie. 1997. Corporeal Subjectivities: Merleau-Ponty, Education and the Post-modern Subject. Journal of Philosophy of Education 33 (2): 277–286.Google Scholar
  21. Perkins, Rosie. 2013. Hierarchies and Learning in the Conservatoire: Exploring What Students Learn through the Lens of Bourdieu. Research Studies in Music Education 35: 197–212. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1321103X13508060. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  22. Polifonia Accreditation Working Group. 2010. Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Higher Music Education. In AEC Publications 2010—Framework Document. Amsterdam: AEC Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Renshaw, Peter. 2013. Collaborative Learning: A Catalyst for Organisational Development in Higher Music Education. In Collaborative Learning in Higher Music Education, ed. Helena Gaunt and Heidi Westerlund, 237–246. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  24. Rodgers, Paul, and Craig Bremner. 2013. Design Without Discipline. Design Issues 29: 4–13. http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/8863/1/DesignWithoutDiscipline-final.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2017.
  25. Rumiantsev, Tamara, Annermarie Maas, and Wilfried Admiraal. 2016. Collaborative Learning in Two Vocal Conservatoire Courses. Music Education Research 1–13. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14613808.2016.1249363. Accessed 11 April 2017.
  26. Schon, David. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Schon, David. 1985. The Design Studio: An Exploration of its Traditions and Potentials. London: Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Stock, Cheryl. 2013. Writing Embodied Practice from the Inside: Outside the Exegesis. In Doctoral Writing in the Creative and Performing Arts, ed. Louise Ravelli, Brian Paltridge, and Sue Starfield, 297–318. Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act. 2011. Higher Education Framework Standards 2015. Federal Register of Legislation: Commonwealth Government. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2015L01639.
  30. Tudor, Robyn. 2005. Creativity: A Higher Order Capability. PhD diss., University of Technology, Sydney.Google Scholar
  31. Windsor, Harry. 2016. CEO Neil Peplow on AFTRS’ Remit and the Return of Discipline-Specific MAs. IF Magazine, August 25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.National Institute of Dramatic ArtKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations